Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Here's the problem as I see it, to many people who haven't followed the game for that long, and don't know the history, these horses are special....because relative to what they've seen they are, in fact, special. Now, in the short term there's nothing specifically wrong with that, but in relation to the true greats these horses are also rans. That doesn't mean they aren't very good horses, but it also doesn't put them in the rarified air of the true greats, and if you are going to attach the word " great " to a horse it is competing with history....and not just the personal history of the judger.
|
This is a really good point but I want to ask something and I'll use king's Silent Witness thought as an example....
He and I have had that discussion quite a few times... horses like Silent Witness and Makybe Diva and whether or not they were greats.
I realize I'm a newer fan and so my frame of reference is a lot different, but don't the older fans also do this... consider the horses who first excited them as great?
I mean on King's tagline for example.....I'm assuming he's saying King Glorious and Java Gold were great (?). I'm not saying they were or weren't... I have no idea.
Silent Witness won 18 races... 18 - 3 - 2 out of 29. Went to Japan a couple of times, won the Sprinters Stakes over there, in his career repeatedly beat G1 winners.
So for someone who came into the game when he was undefeated and just phenomenal, for someone who didn't know any of the history of the sport, he defined greatness and that's why.
I can understand the other side though, the people who say he beat the same horses over and over.
My problem with that is that not everyone realizes just how good these other horses were. Cape of Good Hope for example.
Do the older fans do this? I'm not trying to be cute, I really want to know.
Does history make a great horse greater?
The great horses of the past..... if one were to look at who they beat, whether or not they remained in one area, etc. would they still measure up in general or have they become part of folklore?
It seems like no present day horse ever measures up to the past and I'm trying to figure out if this is valid or not.
I realize it probably is, but.....