
10-17-2007, 10:54 PM
|
 |
Woodbine
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 1,010
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELA
To be honest, I thought I said that. I did mean that. I did not point blank say that they need much more reform, but I agree, along the lines of the things I was talking about -- transparency, accountability, and so on. However, one component that is absolutely needed for a better NYRA -- is not only internal, but external -- is a complete overhaul of the laws, legislation and operating environment.
As far as Spitzer, I expect many people to have different opinions and tastes. That's why Baskin-Robbins has all those flavors, LOL.
Regarding the not for profit and nonprofit aspect, I've heard too many people debate nonprofit, not for profit, quasi-nonprofit, quasi this, that, and so on. Professionally, and personally, I have much involvement in the (let's just call it) nonprofit world.
I wouldn't debate the issue, as in this forum it's a fallacious arguement. However, not for profit and nonprofit -- both are a tax status, they are not a management style.
Eric
|
Agreed. I also have much involvement in that not-for-profit/non-profit world. However we are an independent contractor that makes our profit on making these non-profits/not-for-profits capital gain. If we don't enable them to increase capital, we don't make our income. Many sides of the die in the non-profit/not-for-profit world. It truely is an issue that, I feel, should be debated in the case of NYRA and NYS, but perhaps not in this discussion in this thread, it seems complicated and agressive enough...
|