09-24-2007, 07:37 AM
|
|
Newmarket
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ex-specialist
Also, what percentage of horses broke down over the turf vs. dirt (or fake dirt). What about training breakdowns, which are never included? Its too broad a stroke to take, what's good and what's bad. The poly in Chicago seemed to play much differently to the one in Keeneland, which is a travesty. Im not sure who uses what surface, but the difference in Chicago races didnt LOOK that different. Now, how about a breakdown of where winners came from i.e. wire to wire, stalk, dead closer?
|
Already covered that.
http://derbytrail.com/forums/showthr...938#post260938 |