I still dont understand why people are so against having gambling where it is already legal.

$2 on a horse race or $1 in a one armed bandit, is there really that much difference?
The tracks already have a license to allow gambling (though it may have to be adjusted to allow for the machines)

How can they argue against allowing people to gamble where they can already do so?
SHEESH!


T.T.Y.L. Greg