Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Samarta
You know this is quite interesting to me. The fact that someone could watch animals put in a situation for human entertainment fight to the death or worse near death and left to die and feel nothing is beyond me. Now the point is does it make it wrong. Who am I to judge that? What about when people actually go out to the barn or yard or whatever to get dinner? What do they feel when they ring a neck or chop a head off? If anything, they feel they are 5 minutes closer to a full belly. I couldn't do it, but does it make it wrong? Who am I to judge that?
|
I think it comes down to
intentions. People who use their own farm animals as food do so to eat. They dont torture the animals. Wringing the neck is a fairly quick, fairly painless way to kill food in the form of a bird. The people want to efficiently and quickly kill the animals so they can get down to butchering. I had to wring the neck of a goose that had been shot by a friend. The goose was flailing around in a rice paddy (he cussed at himself for a bad shot that did not lead to a clean kill). It was not pleasant and I actually completely tore the head and neck off and sent the body of the goose catapulting 50 yards. My friend got mad and said I should not hammer throw the bird (geese are quite large). I had never done it before and just wanted to make sure the bird was not suffering.
I think this is very different than putting animals together knowing they will tear each other apart and suffer... very different. Killing animals for food is not a new invention by humans. Neither is torturing animals for some thrill. But I would argue the torture for thrill is done on a much smaller scale and is clearly
not done for survival (eating). Its done for entertainment. Torture for entertainment. Very different.