Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cmorioles
Since speed figures take the track into account, his previous 120s say smashing the track record was within his realm.
As you say, the slow opening 1/4, and that is very slow for Churchill, probably contributed to the lower time more than anything else.
|
I know the "if it looks like he's doing it easily he isn't going to run faster if pressured" adage but all things considered, he might have been able to. That was an absolute waltz to go 1:07 3/5.
Speaking of track records, I was at Monmouth today and the horse that ran behind Unbridled Sidney in the turf sprint the day before the BC last year crushed the track record at 5.5F on turf, 1:00.81.