golfer/byk,
The interesting part of that study is that I wonder how many of those 3 year olds that went negative, went negative as a two year old also, not many. I can't remember many negative 2 year old numbers, especially one as low as neg 2. What I think happens is he moves backward, by 2 points, setting up the 0-2=x theory, and that my friend really puts JB in a bad spot, because the all of the racing world will be talking about it, and if he 'X's like he is suppose to in that given spot, JB becomes even richer, if he doesn't 'X' and wins the TC, that theory loses crediability.
I am guessing SS runs about a neg1/2 to zero range, which wins this race
|