Quote:
|
Originally Posted by brianwspencer
Of course I see where you're coming from. The run-up to the vote has been interesting to watch because I've been following it and what both sides have been saying about it.
I think that it speaks to your earlier post about the spirit of fairness and how other laws are already on the books. Of course there is always the potential that these laws will get interpreted very loosely by a DA, but there is the potential that they will get loosely interpreted when regarding race and religion as well, which is why I think your earlier post was very important. If there are no hate crime laws at all, that is very much one thing -- but if they continue to exist to protect certain subsets of the population, then I see no reason why they should not also protect a group who accounts for ~16% of all crimes that are already considered hate crimes (at the state level in states that already have these statutes on the books).
I just find it disingenuous that there are so many groups who are already covered by these laws that have people who say "all crimes are hate crimes," but do nothing to get their existing protections scrapped from the books. Those sorts of actions are what make proponents of this bill see those who vote against it and the president who veto it as homophobes or bigots -- because they are denying protection to a group who is very much attacked in the United States based on who they are, while they are enjoying protection from attacks based on who they are. Something doesn't add up there, and if it's not about homophobia or bigotry then what is it as long as we have other existing protected subsets on the books?
|
I'm staying out of this argument because when I see hate and ignorance I tend to call folks on it and that only degrades the quality of a debate, Baba brings up good points and I agree that in a perfect world, we wouldn't need "hate crime laws" but obviously they are on the books so we have a simple choice: repeal them all or cover all "at risk" groups. When I read "being gay is a choice" or "they bring violence on themselves", there isn't much of a constructive nature I can say...children aren't born to hate they have to be taught, obviously some folks have been taught well and sadly, will probably pass it on to their kids. It remains a mystery to me why who sleeps with who is more important to folks than who is abusing, beating or killing who.