Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cajungator26
It's also said that it's an advantage if a horse has more points in the middle category (classic) than the others. I like to see at least 8 points in the classic category. That would leave the following contenders out of the ones that already fit the 4 angles you mentioned (I put the number of points they each have in that classic category after their names):
Any Given Saturday (10)
Cowtown Cat (8)
Hard Spun (24)
Liquidity (14)
Nobiz (12)
Sam P. (14)
Scat Daddy (11)
Sedgefield (11)
Storm in May (11)
Zanjero (8)
Xchanger (12) - if he goes.
Teuflesberg (9) - if he makes it in.
|
No offense to u but any "formula", "angle", "system", etc., that can include Teuflesberg, Storm in May, Sedgefield, Sam P., and Liquidity in it........but can't include Circular Quay and Curlin..........should be thrown out of the nearest window. Now, just because it does include Nobiz, Hard Spun and Scat Daddy, should one of those three win, I don't think it can be said that the angle was correct. They could have won no matter if CQ and Curlin had met every criteria. At some point, shouldn't what u see with your eyes take over and all of this silly angle stuff be left alone? Anyone on here old enough to remember when horses were judged by how good THEY were, not by some silly formulas, speed ratings, or curses?
__________________
The real horses of the year (1986-2020)
Manila, Java Gold, Alysheba, Sunday Silence, Go for Wand, In Excess, Paseana, Kotashaan, Holy Bull, Cigar, Alphabet Soup, Formal Gold, Skip Away, Artax, Tiznow, Point Given, Azeri, Candy Ride, Smarty Jones, Ghostzapper, Invasor, Curlin, Zenyatta, Zenyatta, Goldikova, Havre de Grace, Wise Dan, Wise Dan, California Chrome, American Pharoah, Arrogate, Gun Runner, Accelerate, Maximum Security, Gamine
|