Quote:
|
Originally Posted by miraja2
Well this is certainly true. But by almost any measure in which horses could be evaluated, Invasor has a better career than Bernardini. Invasor has won more races, more stakes races, more money, won the only head-to-head matchup, and he has less losses (1) than Bernardini (2).
That doesn't mean Bernardini wasn't good. It just means that Invasor is very good.
|
If you're arguing that Invasor has accomplished more on the track, I obviously can't refute that. But I don't think more money and more stakes races makes him better, considering that Invasor has the benefit of having been in more races.