Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scav
While it is hard to argue because both players meant different things to their teams, Sandburg was clearly a better all around player. HE WON games on his own when the Cubs sucked. He WON GAMES HIMSELF in a team sport. He was a SMALL notch below defensively, and probably better then Morgan towards the end of his career, but offensively, you will not convince me otherwise that Morgen was better, not a chance
|
Morgan is a better player.
Comparing the players against the leagues that they played in:
Batting average
Morgan .271 vs league .260
Sandberg .285 vs league .269
slight advantage to RS
OBP
Morgan .392. vs league .326
Sandberg . 344 vs league .333
huge advantage Morgan
OPS
Morgan .819 vs league .710
Sandberg .796 vs league .741
huge advantage Morgan
Slg %
Morgan .427 vs League .384
Sandberg .452 vs league .404
even
Runs Created per 27 outs
Morgan 6.59
Sandberg 5.58
advantage Morgan
Runs created per 650 Ab
Morgan 100.4
Sandberg 91.8
advantage Morgan
Secondary average
Morgan .431
Sandberg .296
huge advantage Morgan
Sb
Morgan 689 from 801 attempts 86%
Sandberg 344 from 451 attempts 76%
big advantage Morgan
And these stats are a bit skewed in favor of Sandberg because he played his whole career in a very favorable hitters park while Morgan had 6 years of the Astrodome. Plus Morgan did not know when to go and really dragged his numbers down the last 2 years of his career. Sandberg is a great player and a top 6 all time second basemen. But Morgan is only behind the great Rogers Hornsby as a second baseman and is the best of the modern age.