Well,the deal here is that people don't want to have to explain to their kids where (on the dog's body) a scrotum is,or what it is for.That is the issue.People want kids to be ignorant about sex until they are a certain age,and then they give them a book to explain it. I think I wouldn't have a problem with that attitude, but these same parents don't act the same way about exposing their kids to violence. They don't mind them seeing that in video games,movies,and even cartoons.They buy them toys that,if real,would kill others.They will gladly buy them a slingshot to fire a rock at an animal with,but they would be outraged if somebody told their kids about how these animals reproduce themselves.That,I don't understand.I also don't think these same people would be outraged if some animal or insect got stepped on(and killed) on the 1st page of this book.Violence is acceptable to them,but not sex.People have their favorite things to get upset about,and for a lot of people,their favorite topic to hate(to get upset about)is sex.If something got stabbed,crushed,or shot,would people be outraged that their kids are being exposed to violence?? Probably not........These people are so inconsistent about "protecting" their kids.They are "uncomfortable" about tallking about sex,but have no problem telling their kids about violence,and killing.Just odd (to me.)
|