Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Why you giving me names of horses that last raced in JAN 2006,and Sept 2005? This mule you ran Saturday night is pretty typical.She won at Arlington for somebody.Then lays up 4 months n' runs 7th by 17 lengths.Then you guys get her(who wouldn't want her then right? duh),and she loses by almost 9 lengths.You run her for the same tag (with Nick Meza,)and she can't compete,Big surprise.Drop to 5k.Then complain about a track surface.All I am saying is how can you tell anything about a track surface when you test it with a pet mule.Doesn't make sense.
|
again my trainer ran 1 over the poly and won last year, im not complaining about the surface becuase the horse lost the race. i guess you automatically assumed so since everytime you lose a bet you find somebody or something to blame other than yourself. i just think the surface is too fast right now. i extensively complained 2 years ago on the espn board about the arlington surface being way too fast, and unfortunately the following year meaning this year look at all the breakdowns we had here.
as far as the filly goes we didnt claim her or ask for the horse. the owners gave her to us and we ran her for straight 3yo's for 16k first time out here at hawthorne which is tougher than 15 non 3l@turfway, she ran 3rd in that race behind a very nice winner, miss queenie is ultra quick. she was in the right race just didnt handle the surface and maybe the shipping also didnt help since she is kinda nervous. she is so much better tho as opposed to when we first got her. if the owners let us run her in the spot we want to next out i think shell be really tough and no its not for 5k
you act like i have no reason to voice an opinion about a surface or anything i want to, well if thats the case please dont tell me what horses are good and which ones arent till you actually plunk down some of your own money or get involved in the sport in a aspect other than strictly gambling on it