Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
If the game had been even close, maybe there might be a point. But it wasnt. it was a drubbing. If this was a once in a blue moon kind of thing, maybe there would be a point. But it isnt. Michigan always loses to USC. Period. Do i need to bring up the stats?
|
They played one REALLY bad quarter of football. Without that one REALLY bad quarter of football, USC doesn't even win the game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
USC lost twice this year. Close games but losses none the less. It happens. No excuses. In each game, with less than five minutes to go, USC needed but ONE score to take the lead. Can Michigan say the same thing? NO. With five minutes to go, they were down by 3 touchdowns.
|
But for crying out loud -- Oregon St. and UCLA? Speaks for itself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
They lose by two touchdowns and they still are the better team?
|
I'm glad you're catching on -- that's what I've been saying this whole time.