Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski
Bullsh!t Oracle. This meet was a significant improvement field-size wise over previous years (even leaving out last year's debacle.) The cushion track brought the runners out, there is no debating that.
FACT: The average daily handle was up 16% over last year. Turf racing or not, that's significant. Some people don't like wagering turf racing (like me), ever thought about that?
|
The overall handle has been represented as up 19% from last year. Now please, explain what fuzzy math can be used to create the concept that average handle was up 16% a day when they ran 9 more racing days than last year. This I have to hear. Its a mathematical impossibility or one of us is using an article with incorrect numbers being cited.