View Single Post
  #15  
Old 12-19-2006, 10:34 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski
Bullsh!t Oracle. This meet was a significant improvement field-size wise over previous years (even leaving out last year's debacle.) The cushion track brought the runners out, there is no debating that.

FACT: The average daily handle was up 16% over last year. Turf racing or not, that's significant. Some people don't like wagering turf racing (like me), ever thought about that?
The overall handle has been represented as up 19% from last year. Now please, explain what fuzzy math can be used to create the concept that average handle was up 16% a day when they ran 9 more racing days than last year. This I have to hear. Its a mathematical impossibility or one of us is using an article with incorrect numbers being cited.
Reply With Quote