ah yes gentlemen, one further rule clarification.
i am guilty of this in week 1, and realized that it is logically incoherent, (which is why I refrained from performing this myself personally,(also because i cannot hit a NAP if you give me the results beforehand), however we did have a case of it this week, and KLAUSBROKES shall allow the man in question to do this, because KLAUS HILL is at fault but no more please. We apologize for my lack of previous clarification:
a NAP selection cannot be dutched, etc., has to be a win bet or e/w.
I think this is consistent with the logic of what a NAP entails in a contest format and what a dutch entails, although perhaps some compelling arguments can be made against, nevetheless KLAUS POWER must be decisive so :
a NAP selection cannot be dutched etc., has to be a win bet or e/w on a single steed
warmest regards, K.
Last edited by KLAUS : 02-05-2016 at 09:04 PM.
|