Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
True, he didn't look as good as the hype portrayed him to be, but to say he was completely exposed is premature.
Hell, I didn't think he was going to win going down the backside.
|
I didn't say the horse was completely exposed. I said the over the top hype was completely exposed.
I have never suggested American Pharoah wasn't a good horse. I said that the hype he was generating was not backed up by his on-track performance. The response I usually got was some BS about him displaying mythical qualities in the morning. This was clearly not backed up by his performance in the Derby....which was good, but hardly in the pantheon of great Derby performances.
As far as what he looked like down the backstretch....you are in the minority. Had he been the horse some experts wanted us to believe, he would have won by more, without being hit 32 times.
Quite a few horses, good horses, have followed up Derby wins with far more decisive Preakness performances. It surely possible that American Pharoah could be one of those. We'll see.