Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Where is the respect for Invasor (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6757)

Revolution 11-10-2006 09:43 AM

Where is the respect for Invasor
 
These three writers, Pricci, Haskin, and Beyer are telling us how bad Godolphin is, but aren't they bringing back the Horse of the Year.

Did the writers miss something or did Invasor just easily handle Bernardini, and he did it off a huge layoff.

Bernardini is no Invasor and these writers instead of giving credit to the Horse of the Year are criticizing the owners.

It sounds like a bunch of people that were made to look stupid when their "superhorse" was beaten by a real superhorse.

Coach Pants 11-10-2006 09:44 AM

Does Revolution know what a question mark is?

Tune in tomorrow for another episode of as The Revolution Turns on Derby Trail!

Cajungator26 11-10-2006 09:45 AM

It tells me that the general consensus in the industry is that Bernardini was a better horse and that they're disappointed he won't have the chance to prove that. I'm not downing Invasor... he ran a superb race, but I think that Bernardini had a huge chance of improving as a 4 year old, and now we'll never know...

Revolution 11-10-2006 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
Does Revolution know what a question mark is?

Tune in tomorrow for another episode of as The Revolution Turns on Derby Trail!


If you are commenting on people's punctuation you really have no life. Find a hobby or something.

Coach Pants 11-10-2006 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revolution
Dude, go buy yourself some self-esteem.

Go buy yourself a question mark.

Coach Pants 11-10-2006 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revolution
If you are commenting on people's punctuation you really have no life. Find a hobby or something.

Awww somebody is rattled.

Revolution 11-10-2006 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
It tells me that the general consensus in the industry is that Bernardini was a better horse and that they're disappointed he won't have the chance to prove that. I'm not downing Invasor... he ran a superb race, but I think that Bernardini had a huge chance of improving as a 4 year old, and now we'll never know...

Nobody thinks Bernardini is better than Invasor or Discreet Cat. They hyped up Bernardini in order to create a star. He never deserved the hype. I admit, I fell for it too, but he really doesn't have that great of a racing record. He beat a bunch of small fields and got a bunch of tired horses in the Preakness. His one test, he failed.

He was beaten by a horse off a huge layoff, and that horse was trounced by Discreet Cat.

Revolution 11-10-2006 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
Awww somebody is rattled.

Dude, you really have absolutely zero life. Who comments on punctuation. What is next spelling.

I don't used ? because I am a very fast typer and the ? is a pain because my left pinky doesn't have full flexibility.

Are you happy now?

You have to have something better to do with your time. Your life can't really be that pathetic.

SniperSB23 11-10-2006 09:54 AM

Pricci - "Lost in much of the pre-Classic storyline was a lack of respect for the accomplishments of Invasor. Only after the race did it finally resonate that the young Southern Hemisphere 4-year-old was undefeated in American Grade 1 company, twice overcoming trouble and once surviving the most strenuous stretch duel of the handicap season after first enduring multiple challengers"

Cajungator26 11-10-2006 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revolution
Nobody thinks Bernardini is better than Invasor or Discreet Cat. They hyped up Bernardini in order to create a star. He never deserved the hype. I admit, I fell for it too, but he really doesn't have that great of a racing record. He beat a bunch of small fields and got a bunch of tired horses in the Preakness. His one test, he failed.

He was beaten by a horse off a huge layoff, and that horse was trounced by Discreet Cat.

Look, I was one of the people who didn't think Bernie had a chance in the BCC. He ran one hell of a race IMO and he didn't appear to be handling the track in the same manner as his other races. I agree that the fields he beat all year were suspect, etc, but he proved more to me by losing in the BCC than he did in any of his other races. It's comical to me that the past month you had been hyping Bernardini and now he's some rat... incredible.

Coach Pants 11-10-2006 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revolution
Dude, you really have absolutely zero life. Who comments on punctuation. What is next spelling.

I don't used ? because I am a very fast typer and the ? is a pain because my left pinky doesn't have full flexibility.

Are you happy now?

You have to have something better to do with your time. Your life can't really be that pathetic.

I pick on you because you're a moron of epic proportions. You are the biggest redboarding, schit stirring troll on the forum.

Revolution 11-10-2006 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
I pick on you because you're a moron of epic proportions. You are the biggest redboarding, schit stirring troll on the forum.

You do it because you are a loser who has no life and has nothing better to do. Just admit it. I come on here about 1/2 hr a day, and you are always here. Probably 10-15hrs a day. Get a hobby.

Coach Pants 11-10-2006 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revolution
You do it because you are a loser who has no life and has nothing better to do. Just admit it. I come on here about 1/2 hr a day, and you are always here. Probably 10-15hrs a day. Get a hobby.

This is a place for a specific hobby. Next.

Remember this?

http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...07&postcount=3

:D

Kasept 11-10-2006 10:29 AM

Invasor got plenty of positive notice once he arrived in the U.S. And of course he was well covered off of Beyer's negative sentiments about his prospects before the Pimlico Special. Haskin researched a great piece on Invasor for more than a months that includes detailed feedback from his original owner whom he had to search two continents to find. He had been at KMc's BEL barn nearly daily for 2 months around Invasor. It ran last month.

http://www.bloodhorse.com/articleind...e.asp?id=35758

Haskin has been writing glowingly about Invasor from day one. Here's a chat from September where Invasor is cited repeatedly as the main danger to Bernardini in the Classic, and at that time expectantly, in the JCGC .

http://www.bloodhorse.com/talkinhorses/SH091306.asp

If you think Invasor has been under-appreciated or under-lauded, you just haven't read enough or weren't clued into his story early on. From my own perspective, this is a totally cool horse who I got to be around this spring at McLaughlin's barn and was juiced about since finding about him going into the Dubai race. Talked extensively with McLaughlin about him on ATRAB as well after the World Cup. The 3yo's are always going to be the more 'hyped' stories though, and Bernardini was the natural focus going into Saturday. It's hardly a lack of appreciation for what Invasor is.

paisjpq 11-10-2006 10:32 AM

[IMG][/IMG]

Cajungator26 11-10-2006 10:34 AM

Cool picture, Bethani!

paisjpq 11-10-2006 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
Cool picture, Bethani!

thanks, it was actually taken with my phone...pretty good quality for motorola.

Cajungator26 11-10-2006 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paisjpq
thanks, it was actually taken with my phone...pretty good quality for motorola.

That's excellent quality... my motorola cam phone stinks (i850.) It's supposed to be a good one, but it has never taken that kind of pic.

Kasept 11-10-2006 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
That's excellent quality... my motorola cam phone stinks (i850.) It's supposed to be a good one, but it has never taken that kind of pic.

Perhaps it was the photo's subjects that allowed for the quality... ;)

paisjpq 11-10-2006 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept
Perhaps it was the photo's subjects that allowed for the quality... ;)

please...a good photographer can make any subject look good...:eek:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.