![]() |
I want your opinion on this...
... I've made mention to this yesterday, but I can't get this off of my mind. I'm not trying to scrunge up any conspiracies, but I still think I got screwed a little.
I hit the $1 exacta on the BC mile yesterday. 24-1 over 5-1 right? It only paid $12 off the $1. I think it should've been closer to $200. Here's why- It's a 14 horse field, there's an ass-load of handle which were making for nice payouts all day, and I had a longshot over like the 2nd or 3rd favroite... I was just realy disappointed by the payoff? Am I justified? |
I think $246 is right. Out of curiosity, why do you think it should have paid more?
|
and you also have to keep in mind that the odds dont have anything to do with the exacta payouts. Although they are an indicator.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I know win odds and exacta payouts are 2 different animals. But they usually are indicators or what an exacta could be. I figured with the big 14 horse field, a few luke-warm favortes, and the fact that a longshot came in on top, and a big handle: I thought I deserved more. Also payoffs all day were coming in big.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.