Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Jones on HDG and weight (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=46029)

Danzig 03-20-2012 01:05 PM

Jones on HDG and weight
 
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...som?source=rss


For owner Rick Porter and trainer Larry Jones, Plan A is to run Horse of the Year Havre de Grace in the $500,000 Apple Blossom Handicap (gr. I) April 13. However, the connections have also made one thing clear: They will only do so under the right weight conditions.



“Look, we know we’re going to have to carry more weight than most horses in the country. We understand that. But I’m also not fixing to give a multiple grade I winner a lot of weight just because we have an Eclipse Award that was done off of votes and doesn’t take into account what happened on the racetrack.:rolleyes: I’m not going to spot a lot of weight to a horse that has as many grade Is as we have.
“We could look at the Oaklawn Handicap, but then again, it’s a handicap too. So if we don’t like the weight we’re carrying against the boys we don’t have to run her at all. We always have other options.”

Gate Dancer 03-20-2012 01:10 PM

Boy, does this sound familiar...............and tiresome.

Coach Pants 03-20-2012 01:12 PM

It's a shame that people with that sort of character are dictating how the game is run. I liked it better when he had that faux retirement.

Kasept 03-20-2012 01:20 PM

This is almost certainly Rick Porter shoving Jones in front of the question. WTF? The filly drags Larry's 185 pound cowboy azz around in the mornings... you telling us 126-130 is going to burden her? Ridiculous. If they weren't prepared to face the handicap that comes with what she accomplished, then they shouldn't have come back.

TouchOfGrey 03-20-2012 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept (Post 847053)
If they weren't prepared to face the handicap that comes with what she accomplished, then they shouldn't have come back.

:tro:

King Glorious 03-20-2012 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept (Post 847053)
This is almost certainly Rick Porter shoving Jones in front of the question. WTF? The filly drags Larry's 185 pound cowboy azz around in the mornings... you telling us 126-130 is going to burden her? Ridiculous. If they weren't prepared to face the handicap that comes with what she accomplished, then they shouldn't have come back.

I agree with part of this. The fact that owners and trainers cry over what really isn't a lot of weight is sad and disappointing. You have 2yo fillies carrying more weight in maiden races than the reigning HOY carried in her seasonal debut. That's stupid. In days past, this weight thing wouldn't be an issue. She's get what she deserved and run where they planned. But in today's game, it's different. There is so much competition between the tracks to get the star horses that you are able to hold out from a spot if you don't like what you are given because you know some other racing sec will give you what you want.

There's also another issue at play here where I sort of agree with Porter and Jones. I don't know if the issue is necessarily how much HDG would get but rather how much she'd have to give to the others. I think if they were all carrying 140, we wouldn't be hearing about the issue. But since we still do handicap racing here, the spread will continue to be the issue. Say HDG and Royal Delta met up. I think we'd hear the same complaints from them whether the weights were 110-106 or 140-136. I do understand where they are coming from with this. To most people, they'll look at it and say that four pounds doesn't make a difference. They might be right. Would six pounds make a difference? What about 10 or 20 pounds? The point I'm trying to make is that at some point, it does make a difference and I don't think that it hits all of a sudden (ie, four pounds no difference but five pounds equals a length). I wish they'd end handicap racing period and just run them all as weight for age/sex stakes.

OldDog 03-20-2012 02:07 PM

If you wanna be an all-time great, you're gonna hafta carry the weight.

Alan07 03-20-2012 02:22 PM

I'm willing to bet she doesn't make it past the summer.

Danzig 03-20-2012 02:56 PM

if you want people to think you have the best horse, you campaign her like she's the best. they still have their panties in a wad because she lost to proud spell. they're more focused on that then the fact she got HOY, and don't want it to happen again-which is absurd.
she hasn't got a big stud deal to screw up.

my very first thought when i read the article was oh, don't be a pu***. if you're going to bitch and moan all year, just retire her and spare us the drama.

blackthroatedwind 03-20-2012 03:06 PM

The comments are so hilarious it makes it sound as though they don't believe she deserved Horse of the Year.

I just hope the Obeah is under allowance conditions.

Indian Charlie 03-20-2012 03:14 PM

Sigh.

It's such a burden having a reigning HOY.

You people have no idea.

richard 03-20-2012 03:35 PM

If you look at Dream Supreme's final two races you can make a case that her assigned weight was the reason she lost.

In the Ballerina(G1) she visibly tired in the stretch, giving 9 pounds to the winner Shine Again, and finishing 3rd, 2 L back.
http://www.equibase.com/premium/eqbP...try=USA&race=9

Her final race, 2 months later in the First Flight(G2), saw her giving 5 pounds to winner Shine Again in a 2nd place finish by a head.
http://www.equibase.com/premium/eqbP...try=USA&race=8

Danzig 03-20-2012 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 847084)
Sigh.

It's such a burden having a reigning HOY.

You people have no idea.

those damned voters. how dare they create such a mess?!

Danzig 03-20-2012 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 847083)
The comments are so hilarious it makes it sound as though they don't believe she deserved Horse of the Year.

I just hope the Obeah is under allowance conditions.

they are hilarious. obviously they're fishing for low weights.

the sad part-it'll work. then if she has another good year, they'll turn around and politic for a repeat as HOY without having earned it.

Thunder Gulch 03-20-2012 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 847080)
if you want people to think you have the best horse, you campaign her like she's the best. they still have their panties in a wad because she lost to proud spell. they're more focused on that then the fact she got HOY, and don't want it to happen again-which is absurd.
she hasn't got a big stud deal to screw up.

my very first thought when i read the article was oh, don't be a pu***. if you're going to bitch and moan all year, just retire her and spare us the drama.

Campaigning the "best" like the best went out the window a few years ago...oh nevermind, don't want to rehash that old argument. Fans want to see champions run, but a 10 race campaign like Cigar ran less than 20 years ago is no longer the way the game is played.

Danzig 03-20-2012 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thunder Gulch (Post 847089)
Campaigning the "best" like the best went out the window a few years ago...oh nevermind, don't want to rehash that old argument. Fans want to see champions run, but a 10 race campaign like Cigar ran less than 20 years ago is no longer the way the game is played.

yeah, i know it. it just blows my mind that they're still sore over HDG losing to proud spell-yeah, that one pound made all the difference. :rolleyes: it's just a shame.
we need more owners like martha gerry, who owned forego. ah, wouldn't that be so nice?

Clip-Clop 03-20-2012 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 847093)
yeah, i know it. it just blows my mind that they're still sore over HDG losing to proud spell-yeah, that one pound made all the difference. :rolleyes: it's just a shame.
we need more owners like martha gerry, who owned forego. ah, wouldn't that be so nice?

Blind Luck?

We need more horses like her.

Danzig 03-20-2012 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop (Post 847106)
Blind Luck?

We need more horses like her.

yeah, her too! i thought it was the wrong name, but didn't feel like checking. :D

Merlinsky 03-20-2012 07:44 PM

I came here to whine about this situation, but looks like y'all got this started all on it without me. ;) I don't like veiled threats. Heck they're not that veiled. It'd serve them right to get what she deserves to carry. That begs the question, what should that be? And what should Plum Pretty get?

Cannon Shell 03-20-2012 07:53 PM

How ironic of them saying they will only run if the weights are "fair" which actually means they will only run if the weights are unfair to the competition.

Now trainers have always complained about weights but rarely has anyone made statements like these with a horse as accomplished as this. They just wont run her and will wait for another handicap race in May? What if those weights dont suit her either? Just train up to the Breeders Cup? It is an embarrassment and more proof that racing at the top end is a shell of itself. Porter and Jones want the tracks to bend over backwards to give them an unfair advantage yet when the end of the year rolls around will be praising their horse like she is one of the all time greats.

The grading system does more harm to racing than anything. Jones acting as though every grade 1 race/winner should be treated equally is stupid.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.