waterboarding vs drone attacks
 

i find it funny that the democratic side thinks that drone attacks under obamas administration are just.lets look at this..is it better and more humane to send a team in and get the bad guy bring him back and waterboard him.or send a drone missle into a place of intrest killing everyone in the kill zone..children and non combatents?..id love to hear your take on this..as it is the policy of our country right now..and we dont even need a congressional finding or need to be at 'war'..

Drone attack = zero casualties for our side..

Team insertion = possible casualties for our side...

In the invasion of Iraq and subsequent action, were children and bystanders killed?

possible

drone attack..kills everyone as long as its not us..but waterboarding does not kill innocents..

was obama not going to bring the troops home? they just moved some of them to afganistan..fail

In the invasion of Iraq and subsequent action, were children and bystanders killed?

What was your reply to above...

Honestly Matty, the country has much bigger fish fry.

yes and it continued after obama took over..

true..like not letting this prick get re elected..

There are no sides anymore. It's one uniform party in the US. It's theater....100 percent of it. Any perceived differences they present to us are distractions for us to fight each other on message boards like we're really important or something. You are correct in the fact that there are in fact zero differences between our current president and our previous president, and our president before that. zero. Look what happens to those who stray...Paul, Kucinich, etc. They are simply tossed aside.

'war is cruelty, you cannot refine it.' william tecumseh sherman after taking atlanta.

if we were going to do afganistan in a half assed way, better to not go at all. at any rate, i doubt drones are sent if the target is too unsure, or if too many innocents would become casualties.

:rolleyes:

:eek::D:wf