Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Racing ability of broodmares of great horses (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40860)

The Indomitable DrugS 02-07-2011 09:19 PM

Racing ability of broodmares of great horses
 
I just started looking a few minutes ago - but a lot of the ones I looked at haven't been much. Secretariat's dam got drubbed in her only race - and John Henry's dam was getting slapped about at River Downs.

Here are forms of a few:

* Dam of Dr. Fager starting for a claiming tag for the 1st time:




* Dam of Seattle Slew was beaten a couple times for a maiden claiming tag:



* Dam of Man O' War beat double digit lengths in a maiden race at some track I've never heard of:



* Dam of Native Dancer was a respectable racer - but no star:


Indian Charlie 02-07-2011 09:32 PM

You gotta admit though, the track name that the dam of MOW lost at as a maiden claimer is freakin awesome!!!

I hope it was in NJ.

You should check out the dam of Melair.

The Indomitable DrugS 02-07-2011 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 750128)
You gotta admit though, the track name that the dam of MOW lost at as a maiden claimer is freakin awesome!!!

I hope it was in NJ.

You should check out the dam of Melair.

It was a MSW - but yeah - I knew you'd like the name of that track.

No luck getting PP's with Melair's dam - the dam of Swaps ran 8 times and never hit the board... only can find a few result charts for her though. Not much for West Coast stuff sadly.

Port Conway Lane 02-07-2011 10:09 PM

Google came up with a few hits.

http://cgi.ebay.com/5-x-7-HORSE-RACE...-/220735248221

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive...D8415B838DF1D3

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive...D8415B858DF1D3

trackrat59 02-08-2011 05:57 AM

I often thought about how Somethingroyal had only raced once. It's interesting that what makes these mares so super special is the ability to pass along greatness even though they were not runners themselves.

It seems that there are many more mares like this than those that were great runners and passed their abilities directly along to their offspring.

Makes me think about Zen and Rachel and what their abilities will be as broodmares.

The Indomitable DrugS 02-08-2011 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trackrat59 (Post 750151)
Makes me think about Zen and Rachel and what their abilities will be as broodmares.

The odds are against them.

While no great horse, the dam of Hard Spun was interesting. She was drubbed at Penn National in her debut. She couldn't beat a goat on dirt. Ran like five times on dirt, and never did better than a 40 Beyer. She improved from a 16K claimer on turf to briefly being a stakes class Turf horse.

Considering Hard Spun won both of his synthetic races nicely - he would have probably absolutely loved the turf.

The dam of City Zip and Ghostzapper was claimed in her final start. A lot of claiming mares produced well.

Linny 02-08-2011 07:53 AM

Larry Jones told me that he really had hoped to get Hard Spun on the grass. He thought he could be a superstar grass miler.

Sightseek 02-08-2011 08:18 AM

Do you have the pps for Hasili?

Indian Charlie 02-08-2011 08:40 AM

Toussaud was, to this day, one of the handful of best turf mares I've ever seen.

A complete nutcase perhaps, but that girl could run.

Port Conway Lane 02-08-2011 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trackrat59 (Post 750151)
I often thought about how Somethingroyal had only raced once. It's interesting that what makes these mares so super special is the ability to pass along greatness even though they were not runners themselves.

It seems that there are many more mares like this than those that were great runners and passed their abilities directly along to their offspring.

There are at least as many unraced,non-winning mares bred than there are race winning broodmares. It doesn't mean they are better producers.

Take the dams of the last twenty horses of the year.
2 were unraced
2 were maidens
5 were winners
8 were stakes winners
1 G1 winner
1 G2 winner
1 G3 winner

Over half of these broodmares were stakes winners. Stakes winning broodmares are outnumbered at least 10-1 by all broodmares yet over half of the last twenty HOY are represented by stakes winning mares.

freddymo 02-08-2011 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Port Conway Lane (Post 750179)
There are at least as many unraced,non-winning mares bred than there are race winning broodmares. It doesn't mean they are better producers.

Take the dams of the last twenty horses of the year.
2 were unraced
2 were maidens
5 were winners
8 were stakes winners
1 G1 winner
1 G2 winner
1 G3 winner

Over half of these broodmares were stakes winners. Stakes winning broodmares are outnumbered at least 10-1 by all broodmares yet over half of the last twenty HOY are represented by stakes winning mares.

A more valueable stat would be as follows:


What percentage of stakes winning mares produce stakes winning foals vs. non stakes winners which have been bred to the same stallions.

If you look at the books of 10 high end stallions I think you would find a much more interesting evaluation doing this research.

Port Conway Lane 02-08-2011 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo (Post 750181)
A more valueable stat would be as follows:


What percentage of stakes winning mares produce stakes winning foals vs. non stakes winners which have been bred to the same stallions.

If you look at the books of 10 high end stallions I think you would find a much more interesting evaluation doing this research.

No doubt.
I would separate the broodmares into five categories
unraced
maidens
winners
stakes winners
graded winners

The Indomitable DrugS 02-08-2011 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek (Post 750166)
Do you have the pps for Hasili?

I have all of her offspring but not her.

The Indomitable DrugS 02-08-2011 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Port Conway Lane (Post 750179)
There are at least as many unraced,non-winning mares bred than there are race winning broodmares. It doesn't mean they are better producers.

Take the dams of the last twenty horses of the year.
2 were unraced
2 were maidens
5 were winners
8 were stakes winners
1 G1 winner
1 G2 winner
1 G3 winner

Over half of these broodmares were stakes winners. Stakes winning broodmares are outnumbered at least 10-1 by all broodmares yet over half of the last twenty HOY are represented by stakes winning mares.

The lone Grade 1 winner was Mineshaft's dam Prospector's Deelite?



Glenn Wismer trained Luv Me Luv Me Not beat her in the Kentucky Oaks with Fabio riding.

Glenn's the only trainer who ever made me breakfest before - and the one time he did, it resulted in the only time I can ever remember literally sh!tting my pants in my life.

freddymo 02-08-2011 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 750188)
The lone Grade 1 winner was Mineshaft's dam Prospector's Deelite?



Glenn Wismer trained Luv Me Luv Me Not beat her in the Kentucky Oaks with Fabio riding.

Glenn's the only trainer who ever made me breakfest before - and the one time he did, it resulted in the only time I can ever remember literally sh!tting my pants in my life.

Turnback the alarm crushed her in GOOSE and was a dude as a broodmare also

The Indomitable DrugS 02-08-2011 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny (Post 750163)
Larry Jones told me that he really had hoped to get Hard Spun on the grass. He thought he could be a superstar grass miler.

Wouldn't surprise me. Here was his dam...


GenuineRisk 02-08-2011 11:56 AM

Here's an article from 2004 that looked at racing ability vs. family.

http://www.thoroughbredreview.com/MythoftheFamily.htm

They didn't look at unraced mares, as there's no way of determining their quality on the track, but it's an interesting read.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.