RolloTomasi |
11-12-2010 11:04 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by monipenny
(Post 722640)
How exactly was that silly?
|
How was it silly exactly? He was unplaced. Yeah, yeah, I know, the owners got to meet the Queen and he did beat 2000 Guineas winner Makfi (whom he knocked off stride midstretch while bearing out badly).
Given his effort in the Derby, and his head-to-head record with Lookin At Lucky in 4 previous starts, he conceivably could have won the Preakness.
Quote:
And he certainly is one of the most versatile three year old colts in this weak division this year.
|
Doesn't this just make it even more silly that he would ship out of the country to run while the "weak" horses from his crop reaped all the spoils in the summer and fall?
Quote:
He also owns the horse, so he can do as he pleases.
|
A classic argument. Of course, it's false. The horse has like 20-odd owners. They were all over the Derby telecast, remember?
Quote:
I think he's probably a leading contender for 3 yr olds attending the Dubai races in March.
|
Too bad he'll be 4 by the time March comes around.
Quote:
Personally I would try him in the Dubai World Cup and hope for a top five placing. Those guys over there pay for your trip and Kenny will probably ruin him if he doesn't stay in training for this race. i would lay my money on this guy without benefit of even seeing who runs in the desert on that artificial crap. I guess I understand why they installed it, but leveling the playing field so they don't have to sned the money out of town is stupid in my book. I do hope that McPeek keeps this guy good and is available for the older handicap division next year. I think Blu's horse could be real nice as well.
|
I take back all the other stuff I said.
When compared to the stimulant-fueled fantasy above, running Noble's Promise at Ascot wasn't particularly silly.
|