Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Secretariat -- the movie (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38346)

ShadowRoll 09-16-2010 07:58 AM

Secretariat -- the movie
 
I will go see Secretariat when it comes out, and I'm sure I'll enjoy it. But I was reading this article (link removed, see below) and found the following quote by the screenwriter amusing:

“We never got to see him run as a 4- or 5-year-old,” Rich says. “The real age of maturity for a colt is five. I have no doubt he’d have made a run at another Triple Crown.”

ShadowRoll 09-16-2010 08:25 AM

The article was in the Portland Tribune, which can be found at portlandtribune.com, if anyone wants to risk it. I did not get any malware warning from the site (but I'm at work, which has extremely good protection).

joeydb 09-16-2010 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShadowRoll (Post 696072)
“We never got to see him run as a 4- or 5-year-old,” Rich says. “The real age of maturity for a colt is five. I have no doubt he’d have made a run at another Triple Crown.”

You're scaring me... wow... I mean I know our sport requires a huge amount of learning to get into everything, but I thought most even casual fans knew that the Triple Crown was for 3 year olds only.

Crown@club 09-16-2010 10:22 AM

Did a google search for Portland Tribune and below the link it says "this site may harm your computer."

Now Nortons gave it a pass. Hmm!

But if the screenwriter Mike Rich made the quote, all I got to say is Wow!

ShadowRoll 09-16-2010 03:08 PM

Okay. Per this addendum to the article, turns out that the screenwriter wasn't the cluless one:

"Editorial response: That's my mistake. I misquoted Rich. 'There are major stakes races open to four- and five-year-olds,' Rich says. 'Those are the races I'd have liked to have seen Secretariat in. I have no doubt he'd have done pretty well.' Kerry"

Indian Charlie 09-16-2010 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShadowRoll (Post 696232)
Okay. Per this addendum to the article, turns out that the screenwriter wasn't the cluless one:

"Editorial response: That's my mistake. I misquoted Rich. 'There are major stakes races open to four- and five-year-olds,' Rich says. 'Those are the races I'd have liked to have seen Secretariat in. I have no doubt he'd have done pretty well.' Kerry"

Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.

I'm sure that's how it happened.

That is a pretty big misquote.

Likely he's being paid to have the author save face.

westcoastinvader 09-16-2010 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 696288)
Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.

I'm sure that's how it happened.

That is a pretty big misquote.

Likely he's being paid to have the author save face.

I've wrestled with how far I am going to go out of my way to see that movie.

Those quotes, or misquotes, sure do not help my motivation to go see at the IMax.


I knew far in advance I would never want to view the Ruffian movie.

Secretariat I was up in the air on.

I'm not a fan of "reality TV" at all.

But I saw Secretariat and Ruffian real time, and the real memories are etched in stone.

For better or worse.

Real stuff.

I'm inclined to pass on "historical dramas."

westcoastinvader 09-16-2010 10:27 PM

There was a book on Ruffian that I read back in the late 1990's though that was outstandingly written.

I was based in South Carolina at the time, and was enlightened to her South Carolina connections that I had never known before.

MaTH716 09-16-2010 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by westcoastinvader (Post 696449)
There was a book on Ruffian that I read back in the late 1990's though that was outstandingly written.

I was based in South Carolina at the time, and was enlightened to her South Carolina connections that I had never known before.

The one written by Jane Schwartz was excellent.

westcoastinvader 09-16-2010 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716 (Post 696450)
The one written by Jane Schwartz was excellent.

Thanks.


Absolutely, that is the book.

Here's the book with some samples of the comfortable writing style:

http://books.google.com/books?id=MVZ...page&q&f=false

Indian Charlie 09-17-2010 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by westcoastinvader (Post 696449)
There was a book on Ruffian that I read back in the late 1990's though that was outstandingly written.

I was based in South Carolina at the time, and was enlightened to her South Carolina connections that I had never known before.

I didn't know that Outstandingly had picked up a pen in later life.

westcoastinvader 09-17-2010 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 696471)
I didn't know that Outstandingly had picked up a pen in later life.

English teacher, eh?

Sheesh.


OK though, you are right.


Still a very nice book though.

OldDog 09-17-2010 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by westcoastinvader (Post 696459)
Thanks.


Absolutely, that is the book.

Here's the book with some samples of the comfortable writing style:

http://books.google.com/books?id=MVZ...page&q&f=false

Glad to hear it's well done. It's next on my reading list.

joeydb 09-17-2010 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by westcoastinvader (Post 696445)
I've wrestled with how far I am going to go out of my way to see that movie.

Those quotes, or misquotes, sure do not help my motivation to go see at the IMax.


I knew far in advance I would never want to view the Ruffian movie.

Secretariat I was up in the air on.

I'm not a fan of "reality TV" at all.

But I saw Secretariat and Ruffian real time, and the real memories are etched in stone.

For better or worse.

Real stuff.

I'm inclined to pass on "historical dramas."

I'm going to go see it.

My position is: "If it has hooves and runs, I support it." All forms of racing, and any product that either tries to be reverent and/or increases interest.

My sister-in-law said she wants to go see it, and she participates in the bets my buddies and I put together for the big race days. Anything that gets us exposure (as long as it doesn't tear us down) is a good thing. For all its faults, it looks like the movie, being a Disney product, will be uplifting for those who see it. That can't be bad for racing.

Danzig 09-17-2010 06:45 AM

racing would be better supported if you took your sisinlaw to the track and got her to bet more often.
i won't go see it, but that has more to do with my dislike in general for most movies. i doubt this one is much good-which is a shame, since secretariat was so good. but i saw what they did to the seabiscuit book, can't imagine this would be any better.


heck, i'd have rather they made a movie about slew. seabiscuit and this one are about rich folks with a horse. seattle slew was that groups first horse, bought for not a whole lot of money, and look what he did. now that's a tale.

joeydb 09-17-2010 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 696502)
racing would be better supported if you took your sisinlaw to the track and got her to bet more often.
i won't go see it, but that has more to do with my dislike in general for most movies. i doubt this one is much good-which is a shame, since secretariat was so good. but i saw what they did to the seabiscuit book, can't imagine this would be any better.


heck, i'd have rather they made a movie about slew. seabiscuit and this one are about rich folks with a horse. seattle slew was that groups first horse, bought for not a whole lot of money, and look what he did. now that's a tale.

I'm working on it. I have gotten a lot of friends and family to bet here and there, and they know more and are more enthusastic about racing now. It's slow to progress as many are overwhelmed with other commitments. But we're getting there. Buddies of mine are now attending tournaments too.

I agree that whatever they do will fall short of the true story. Secretariat was a horse of truly mythic proportions. He was Pegasus.

If they make a Seattle Slew movie, I'm going to that one too.

Antitrust32 09-17-2010 08:09 AM

The quote in the first post is ridiculous, but the DT members who are talkin **** on a actual racing movie that will give racing some national exposure are even more ridiculous.

Indian Charlie 09-17-2010 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 696471)
I didn't know that Outstandingly had picked up a pen in later life.

Quote:

Originally Posted by westcoastinvader (Post 696474)
English teacher, eh?

Sheesh.


OK though, you are right.


Still a very nice book though.

Outstandingly was the winner (sort of) of the first Breeders Cup Juvenille Filly race back in 1984.

I was joking.

Danzig 09-17-2010 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 696519)
The quote in the first post is ridiculous, but the DT members who are talkin **** on a actual racing movie that will give racing some national exposure are even more ridiculous.

i figure this movie will help the sport as much as seabiscuit and dreamer did.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.