![]() |
37% Decline in TV Ratings For Belmont
After better Derby numbers I'm surprised to see that kind of drop.
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...-ratings-slide |
Where did all those new fans that the Derby broadcast supposedly created go?
|
Quote:
|
I am still waiting to see the Woodford Reserve Manhattan on ABC...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Is there really any surprise that the ratings are down considering neither the Derby nor Preakness winner ran? Considering this years crop and the field that ran, it is unreasonable to expect more.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Of course there's the pesky problem that one network doesn't own all 3 race rights. Is it next year we could have that again? Makes the likelihood of a bonus easier. I don't blame them for not being enthusiastic about watching the Belmont. I mean it wasn't exactly clash of the titans, and a lot of kids are out of school so people that can find better things to do just might take the opportunity. June's harder for tv viewing, period. Not everybody thinks about the Belmont by name, they just know there's a 3rd race if you have a Triple Crown, so that's another problem. I tried to tell someone I couldn't come with them because the Belmont was on Saturday, they looked at me like I'd said "I can't come with you because I need to learn to play the nose trumpet."
|
How can horse racing expect the average person to sit there with 30 minutes in between races? That's 8 or 9 halftimes a card. I'm never surprised when ratings come back low, it's a brutal sell.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.