Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Eskendereya: 109 BSF for Wood (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=35311)

VOL JACK 04-03-2010 09:05 PM

Eskendereya: 109 BSF for Wood
 
109 Beyer

AeWingnut 04-03-2010 09:52 PM

he's done enough

randallscott35 04-03-2010 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AeWingnut (Post 632187)
he's done enough

LOL

RockHardTen1985 04-03-2010 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 632190)
LOL

Your on a roll tonight, most productive posts.....

randallscott35 04-03-2010 10:15 PM

Good to see Stevie Wonder making figs over in Queens.

NTamm1215 04-03-2010 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 632214)
Good to see Stevie Wonder making figs over in Queens.

What are you talking about?

NT

philcski 04-03-2010 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 632214)
Good to see Stevie Wonder making figs over in Queens.

??
Feels like a good number to me. Should be 14 points faster than the Excelsior which would give that a 95. Also gives Jackson Bend and Awesome Act low 90's which fits well.

That being said, the question remains whether Esk runs back to or close to that number in the Derby.

randallscott35 04-03-2010 10:28 PM

I did not think that track was slow today, 1:50 is avg for the Wood. Both 8550 and WR broke 1:22 at 7 panels...I'm not buying 109. Sorry

RockHardTen1985 04-03-2010 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 632237)
I did not think that track was slow today, 1:50 is avg for the Wood. Both 8550 and WR broke 1:22 at 7 panels...I'm not buying 109. Sorry

Your in really good form right now.

ateamstupid 04-03-2010 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 632237)
I did not think that track was slow today, 1:50 is avg for the Wood. Both 8550 and WR broke 1:22 at 7 panels...I'm not buying 109. Sorry

How do you explain the 1:51.43 in the Excelsior?

randallscott35 04-03-2010 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 632245)
How do you explain the 1:51.43 in the Excelsior?

Very slow horses. More than a reason, are you serious?

blackthroatedwind 04-03-2010 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 632245)
How do you explain the 1:51.43 in the Excelsior?

He doesn't understand how speed figures are made....isn't that obvious?

randallscott35 04-03-2010 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 632248)
He doesn't understand how speed figures are made....isn't that obvious?

You have given him the derby already. Please stick with it.

blackthroatedwind 04-03-2010 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 632249)
You have given him the derby already. Please stick with it.

Well, that's a relevent response. I see you passed dopey internet posting 101.

ateamstupid 04-03-2010 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 632247)
Very slow horses. More than a reason, are you serious?

Am I serious? Eskendereya ran almost 1.5 seconds faster than them. How low do you want to make the Excelsior figure? As bad as the field was, the top three finishers were still running 95-100s coming into the race.

randallscott35 04-03-2010 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 632251)
Am I serious? Eskendereya ran almost 1.5 seconds faster than them. How low do you want to make the Excelsior figure? As bad as the field was, the top three finishers were still running 95-100s coming into the race.

Beyers are for clowns. 88

ateamstupid 04-03-2010 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 632253)
Beyers are for clowns. 88

Who are those numbers (the ones you totally pull out of your ass) for?

randallscott35 04-03-2010 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 632254)
Who are those numbers (the ones you totally pull out of your ass) for?

Excell

MisterB 04-04-2010 04:19 AM

I would think that performance was just what the doctor ordered 4 weeks out from the Derby. What will he run when asked? Looked like a Sunday morning work out.

The Indomitable DrugS 04-04-2010 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 632247)
Very slow horses. More than a reason, are you serious?

More Than A Reason ran a negative 1.5 last out on your numbers, TG .. and he had run a 1.50 or better in 4 of his last 5 races.

Esk will get a pretty huge sheet number because it's baked in that he carried 123lbs and was 3 wide on the turns.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.