Real or Fake?
 

Sightseek and I were just discussing the merits of Chantal Sutherland's boobs, and the question remains-

real or fake?

www.jockeychantalsutherland.com

Real.

Real . . . Nice.

I'm going with Real and Spectacular. :D

Im going with Real Expensive:{>: :{>:

too bad she has no ass.

Real........small.

fake...but who cares, they've got real skin around 'em.

If they exist, they're real.

NT

Well let me see here.....as a recognized expert on human flesh I will offer these observations concerning that which is likely to be natural vs that which was added as a high end option.

There are two common mistakes that are evident in poorly constructed lunar accessories.

1) The first has to do with a nonphysiologic acute curve to cleavage most notable at the surperior end of this theoretical space. If cleavage appears to resemble a pair of nonlinear crescents or look like firm curves separating them in the middle of the line but never touching at the top or bottom. Her mother didn't give them to her....
2) The firmness test, if you nestle up against a chest that bruises yours the chances are they are made of material that wont be nourishing the young. Perky can be pretty but pointy can be pointless... IMO the lady was born with what she displays but may have had an angle or two altered on her face....

Real

Does it matter???

Anyway, I like to know what Freddy thinks about this.

Well, yeah. If she doesn't make weight some day cause she's carrying around 4 pounds of silicon then it would matter. But there's one photo on her site where she's lying on her back and it is beyond debate that they are real.

A fine observation young student....very true