No Breeders' Cup for Rachel...
 

Stonestreet Stables' Jess Jackson, majority owner of Kentucky Oaks (gr. I) and Preakness (gr. I) winner Rachel Alexandra, said in a wide-ranging media teleconference June 24 that the superb filly would not race in this year's Breeders' Cup at Santa Anita but that there is a good possibility that she would return in 2010 for a 4-year-old campaign.

http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...m_medium=email

I guess Jess probably won't send to Dubai either, since they are going synthetic next year also. 2010 Classic at Churchill?

I wonder what he stance would be if Curlin had won last year.

Actually think this is good news. Fucl< the Breeders Cup on fake dirt. Good for Jess... liking the man more and more every day.

Also if she is sound there is absolutely no reason for her not to race as a 4 year old and even a 5 year old... especially if Jess is as unhealthy as I've been hearing.. might as well get all the action in now while you're still around!

Exactly

Maybe he'll send her over to Japan for the Japan Dirt Cup. Its about the last big "dirt" race out there

Hearing?

How about "looking"?

He looked like "The Terminal Case of Benjamin Button" in the Preakness winner's circle.

I know, I felt so bad for him, I didnt realize who that was at first. Do we know what is wrong with him, have they said?

He is 79 years old. Maybe his age has caught up with him.

No thats not age! I mean he looks like a totally different man. If you put pics of him from even when Curlin was running and now, you wouldnt know it was the same person. Very sad

Racing being as backwards as it is, I'm expecting the BC to announce any second now that Santa Anita is their new permanent home.

I'm hoping for a win and you're in for the Malibu.

Better yet, how about win any BC race, and you are in for the next year!

I don't think it would risk RA to run on synthetics anymore than it risks her to run on dirt. If I was 79 years old and owned her, I would run her in both this year's and next year's BC and see what happens.

:eek:

me too!

Sounds like he's affraid to face Zenyatta.
What happened to doing the "Sporting" thing? The sporting thing would be to run in the BC even if it's on Zenyatta's home track. If RA is that good she should have no problem running on synthetics.

Zenyatta has nothing to do with it. He said from the beginning that if they ran in the BC it would be in the Classic.

What happened to doing the "Sporting" thing? The sporting thing would be to run in the Clark Hcp even if it's on Rachel's home track. If Zenyatta is that good, she should have no problems.

See how easily that works both ways? The fact is that Zenyatta's proven on synthetic and dirt and Rachel's proven only on dirt. So wouldn't it make more sense to match them up on something they are both proven on instead of one that is an unknown for one of them?

If it's a fact Zenyatta is proven on dirt because of her win at Oaklawn you could say Rachel is proven on synthetic...she won an allowance race at Keeneland in October. So it does work both ways.

I think its funny how everyone is on a Zenyatta versus RA kick when that is not even the issue at hand.

I don't see anyone critical of how screwed up a sport it is when the two best horses, who happen to both be female, can not even hook up on racings "championship" day, because of the surface.

People keep talking about slots, is that really the issue that the sport has, or is it a complete ineptitude to put out the best product for the people that truly support the sport, not people pulling one armed bandits.

You are right. Winning a nw2L proves you can handle a surface just as much as winning a grade one while beating the reigning champion mare does.