Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   If RACHEL ALEXANDRA Wins The Belmont (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=29845)

HaloWishingwell 05-21-2009 02:47 PM

If RACHEL ALEXANDRA Wins The Belmont
 
where would you rank her achievement?

SniperSB23 05-21-2009 02:48 PM

7th

MaTH716 05-21-2009 02:52 PM

Greatest Horsie EVAH!

KirisClown 05-21-2009 03:14 PM

I'm going with..

"She Would The Best HORSE of All-Time"

Antitrust32 05-21-2009 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KirisClown
I'm going with..

"She Would The Best HORSE of All-Time"


LOL!

Indian Charlie 05-21-2009 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
7th

You're nuts.

tector 05-21-2009 05:29 PM

Well, she'd clearly be the best 3YO filly since Go For Wand (I think she is already, however). How much beyond that you'd want to go is another issue.

I love a horse that takes a race by the throat, which is what she does.

eajinabi 05-21-2009 06:21 PM

Best horse named Rachel

Indian Charlie 05-21-2009 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tector
Well, she'd clearly be the best 3YO filly since Go For Wand (I think she is already, however). How much beyond that you'd want to go is another issue.

I love a horse that takes a race by the throat, which is what she does.

I think the great three fillies from 94(?), Inside Information, Lakeway and Sardula, all would have run RA into the ground.

Well, that might be too strong, but I'd still take those three.

SniperSB23 05-21-2009 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
You're nuts.

As opposed to the people trying to rank her before the race has even been run? Can you imagine this poll before Secretariat ran his Belmont? If Rachel gets loose on the lead setting fractions of 1:18 and then just holds off Mine that Bird by a nose it will be incredibly unimpressive. If Rachel wins by 31 lengths she'll be an all time great. To try and rank a horse on the assumption that they win a race without knowing anything about the actual dynamics of the race is pretty ridiculous.

Indian Charlie 05-21-2009 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
As opposed to the people trying to rank her before the race has even been run? Can you imagine this poll before Secretariat ran his Belmont? If Rachel gets loose on the lead setting fractions of 1:18 and then just holds off Mine that Bird by a nose it will be incredibly unimpressive. If Rachel wins by 31 lengths she'll be an all time great. To try and rank a horse on the assumption that they win a race without knowing anything about the actual dynamics of the race is pretty ridiculous.

I know. I was making fun of the poll, not you. My initial response to myself when I read the poll was "42".

Seven seemed arbitrary enough.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.