Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   401 3-year-olds nominated to Triple Crown races (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27734)

Alan07 02-08-2009 12:14 AM

401 3-year-olds nominated to Triple Crown races
 
Steve Asmussen ended Todd Pletcher’s four-year grip as the nation’s top trainer, and now he’s surpassed him with the most nominations to the Triple Crown races.

Asmussen, the 2008 Eclipse Award-winning trainer who guided Curlin to consecutive Horse of the Year titles, has 25 3-year-olds on the list of 401 thoroughbreds made eligible for the Kentucky Derby, Preakness and Belmont Stakes.

The list was to be released Sunday morning.

Pletcher was next with 20. Two-time Derby winning trainer Nick Zito was third with 19—the same number he had last year. Zayat Stables led owners with 22 nominations—the third year in a row Ahmed Zayat’s stable topped the list.

Among the top names on the list are 2-year-old champions Midshipman and the filly Stardom Bound.

The early nominating fee was $600. A latecomers fee is $6,000 due in March, with a final chance to get in for a $200,000 supplemental fee due before the Derby on May 2.

With a bleak economy, the total nominations dropped for the first time since 2005. Last year, 449 3-year-olds were nominated; the record is 450 in 2007.

http://www.woodbineentertainment.com...327319396?1191

sumitas 02-08-2009 02:08 AM

boring

Echo Farm 02-08-2009 06:17 AM

Not Boring
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sumitas
boring


For those who don't find it boring:

Quote:

The racing industry’s economy-induced contraction has reached the Triple Crown in the form of a 10.7% reduction in the number of horses made eligible for the 2009 series.

The early nomination period closed January 24 with 401 nominees, down 48 horses from 449 in 2008 and the lowest number since 358 horses were nominated for the 2005 series, which was the crop reduced by mare reproductive loss syndrome.

The three-year-olds of 2009 represent a North American crop of 41,115 live foals, which was the largest crop this decade. The percentage of nominated horses is 9.3%, compared with 10.7% last year.
http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/rac...7-in-2009.aspx

The List (PDF)

Bobby Fischer 02-08-2009 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan07

With a bleak economy, the total nominations dropped for the first time since 2005. Last year, 449 3-year-olds were nominated; the record is 450 in 2007.

So last year was 1 shy of the record since they have had the nomination system. Maybe they had a BOUNCE

Bobby Fischer 02-08-2009 08:14 AM

:) so if best beyer was blank "--" , that means he hasn't yet made a debut?

Danzig 02-08-2009 10:07 AM

wonder what next years foal crop will be?

Echo Farm 02-08-2009 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
wonder what next years foal crop will be?

After this year's sales? should be under 25K, but who knows?

Danzig 02-08-2009 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Echo Farm
After this year's sales? should be under 25K, but who knows?

i'm just thinking about all the reports of open mares....stallion rates going down, down.

justindew 02-09-2009 01:25 PM

Did anyone else notice that This Ones For Phil was not nominated? Sorry if this has been mentioned somewhere else.

jwkniska 02-09-2009 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justindew
Did anyone else notice that This Ones For Phil was not nominated? Sorry if this has been mentioned somewhere else.

yes, and it surprised me alot.

lemoncrush 02-09-2009 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwkniska
yes, and it surprised me alot.

Same with Imperial Council not being listed.

Indian Charlie 02-09-2009 01:57 PM

Declan's Moon wasn't listed either.

robfla 02-09-2009 02:20 PM

Quote:

The three-year-olds of 2009 represent a North American crop of 41,115 live foals, which was the largest crop this decade. The percentage of nominated horses is 9.3%, compared with 10.7% last year.
Maybe I am being picky, or missing something, but ....
Doesn't seem like correct math, unless, like I said, I'm missing something..


41,115 live foals, 401 nominees... that is .00975 or .975% horses nominated. ( less than 1 percent )

justindew 02-09-2009 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemoncrush
Same with Imperial Council not being listed.

The list on Bloodhorse.com shows Imperial Council was nominated.

http://tcm.bloodhorse.com/nomination...5Fname&dir=asc

lemoncrush 02-09-2009 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justindew
The list on Bloodhorse.com shows Imperial Council was nominated.

http://tcm.bloodhorse.com/nomination...5Fname&dir=asc

Ahh, you're right.
Looks like the list on Thoroughbred Times omitted it accidentally.

Monarchos1 02-09-2009 08:51 PM

Quality Road is a strange omission, too. I heard that some horses were omitted from the first list that was released and then added before Sunday. Maybe they missed others?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.