Prince of Change reaches for dangerous 'retreads!
 

Back to the soft on crime and terrorists leadership we need!
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q...TJiNGFlYWFiZGI
I'm sure there will be most odious choices to come.

Hi Timmi. The National Review is the most credible, unbiased source of journalism available on the internet. An EDITORIAL in the national review, especially one that lists the authors as "the editors", is completely reliable.

Remember Timmi, "editorial" is not a news article...it is a statement of opinion. Same with "blog" or "column".

Anyway, i hope all is well.

You're losing it sister. This response took about 23 minutes longer than I thought it would.

^^nice avatar

Kinda fond of your avatar as well:)

This place keeps getting more and more dangerous to view at work.

Funny thing is, I don't know if you are referring to the avatars or the link to the NR

The link to the NR is dangerous at home or at work.

Same info is in WSJ.......laugh all you want.....we're screwed as soon as the Fraud is crowned!

which alternate universe is it where there are experienced democrats available that didn't serve in the clinton admin?

yeah, it is pretty hilarious that we heard for a year that Obama couldn't be president because he didn't have enough experience and now he is getting criticized for surrounding himself with people with experience.

I just figured change meant using people who aren't Republicans. Even if it's Clinton administration all over again, the fact that it is different than the Bush administration is change. I mean just how much can you change government anyway? You either shift left or right and Obama is shifting left, therefore that is change.

Another bastion of impartiality
:rolleyes:

:rolleyes:

:rolleyes:

:rolleyes:

lol

lol:confused: lol