Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Bay Meadows to close, according to DRF (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11088)

Dunbar 03-22-2007 03:52 PM

Bay Meadows to close, according to DRF
 
DRF reports that the CHRB denied Bay Meadows' request for a delay in going to a synthetic surface. Bay Meadows says it will close:

http://drf.com/news/article/83412.html

--Dunbar

Antitrust32 03-22-2007 04:05 PM

this is stupid. that cali board jumped to conclusions and forces the tracks to spend 8 mill to put in the poly.

screw california

slowmotion 03-22-2007 04:16 PM

I've heard that a new 250 million dollar facility will be built in Dixon CA. Its about half way between Sacramento and San Fransico. It makes me wonder what would happen to Golden Gate also.

PSH 03-22-2007 04:25 PM

No Cal Racing
 
Truth is the land that they both sit on land that is just way way too valuable. Both facilities are quite old with little or no money spent to keep them up. The one exception was at Bay Meadows to install new barns inside the main track so that the old barns and training track could be torn down and a housing develpment complex was built.

The best thing to happen would probably be to close both facilities down and build the proposed track at Dixon.... It is pretty sad when a race track junkie like myself hardly ever drives the 15 miles to see live racing at Golden Gate fields. The place is an eyesore and the racing quality is poor.

THere has been talk that Bay Meadows has been looking to shut down over the past five years or more. This poly track is just the excuse that they need to shut down and build more houses over the land....

PSH

SCUDSBROTHER 03-22-2007 09:48 PM

Too many tracks running as it is.Let them run half year at the Gate,and then come to SOCAL to run.We need full fields in racing,and we need to stop giving money away for beating 4 horses.

Sportfisting 03-22-2007 10:35 PM

Don't bet on Dixon Downs being approved by the local voter's :mad: .... Last poll showed it losing...... If BM goes dark for good, place your money on SR getting more then just 2 weeks of fair racing!

pointman 03-23-2007 07:54 AM

Reminds me of when Roosevelt Raceway closed on Long Island

randallscott35 03-23-2007 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Too many tracks running as it is.Let them run half year at the Gate,and then come to SOCAL to run.We need full fields in racing,and we need to stop giving money away for beating 4 horses.

That's correct. We need more tracks closing, not less.

Echo Farm 03-23-2007 09:06 AM

Last time I looked, the Dixon Track didn't look hopeful. The Campbell's Soup Tomato plant is nearby and they're worried about the traffic from the track interfering with the 'mater trucks.

Obviously they haven't really looked at the attendance at a track lately.

but mabe the casino would bring the traffic.

Left Bank 03-23-2007 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sportfisting
Don't bet on Dixon Downs being approved by the local voter's :mad: .... Last poll showed it losing...... If BM goes dark for good, place your money on SR getting more then just 2 weeks of fair racing!

That's just what I was thinking.Gotta put that turf course investment to good use.

Echo Farm 03-23-2007 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Echo Farm
Last time I looked, the Dixon Track didn't look hopeful. The Campbell's Soup Tomato plant is nearby and they're worried about the traffic from the track interfering with the 'mater trucks.

Update!

Quote:

3/13/07.....................The limitation that states that Dixon Downs will not hold live horse races in the tomato harvest season -- generally the months of September and October -- was made in response to the lawsuit filed by Campbell Soup Company against the project based on the assertion that traffic caused by Dixon Downs would prevent timely trucking for the soup company's deliveries.

After the announcement of the covenants, Campbell representatives said Mar. 9 that it would drop the litigation, and the company's teamsters union said they are now endorsing the racetrack, according to Mills.
And the Teamsters union is now endorsing the track! Perhaps they could now use some union thugs to persuade the other locals opposing Dixon Downs

more here:
http://media.www.californiaaggie.com...-2773849.shtml

TitanSooner 03-23-2007 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kimmeastar
That's just what I was thinking.Gotta put that turf course investment to good use.

I always felt they "KNEW" what they were doing when they put a turf course in there.. That track is gorgeous.. would be great if they got some more dates.

Danzig 03-23-2007 03:06 PM

no surprise at all. they have been talking development for a while now--no way they'd install a new surface when they aren't looking at being around long term. why bother?
and yeah, there are too many tracks-that more than anything leads to the diluted fields.

TitanSooner 03-23-2007 04:17 PM

but would Santa Rosa be willing to drop in a synthetic surface to be eligible for those dates? I don't think Dixon is going to fly.

sumitas 03-23-2007 06:09 PM

in cali its poly or the highway...so build your stupid condos bay meadows.

Sportfisting 03-23-2007 06:12 PM

Good point! I was thinking about that same situation. One would belive that SR would have to go synthetic to get any dates other then fair racing.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.