![]() |
the 2005 whitney..how much.....
would st laim have one by if not for the high wt.....commentator 115..st laim 122....
|
Quote:
|
comentator was never the same after that....
|
i also had commentator very heavy that day, but bias or not commentator is a very good horse, could still be great, i think he wins anyway you want to look at it, and its a shame that he cant stay healthy
|
I don't think weight matters, but that's just me and I suppose I could be wrong, but I never understood why people suggested after the race that Saint Liam was best. Commentator set an extremely honest pace and Saint Liam had the entire stretch to beat him and flat out lost.
If Dutrow was so confident he had the better horse why did he run, not one but, two rabbits in the Woodward? And, yes, I am way biased about this one. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Running two rabbits at a horse, in a Grade 1 race, with a five horse field, was about as unsporting a move as I've seen, in all the time I followed racing.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm guessing the way Prado pulled Saint Liam back around the first turn he really expected Commentator to come back to him.
http://www.calracing.com/replays.php |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Good one. |
Quote:
Sorry....couldn't resist. |
as long as you bring the drink!!
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.