A funny thing happened on the way to the coronation...
 

Democrats Interrupt Party Chair to Demand More Presidential Debates

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/ar...ential-debates

Say what you will about the Republican debates thus far... at least they have debates.

Of course, Hillary might be too busy circling the wagons in response to the five separate investigations being conducted of her email scandal. Oh, and she is planning to be more spontaneous and open. Nothing like planning spontaneity for authenticity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKjqVwBotJg

Hillary insists, "I am a real person..."

please, please don't let her win.

Guess what? We agree on that sentiment. Have a good day...

oh, i sure will now that i saw what you quoted and said was the best ever post.
that's rich, coming from someone also posting in this room. had him on ignore, so never saw what he wrote til just now.
appreciate it.
and...well, his description is wrong.
steve can tell you, or chuck, or gbbob, or brian spencer etc, etc.

i hope you have a great day.
and remember that jesus loves you.

I did not get the impression that he knew you or put any belief in his description. It was his second paragraph that made me laugh.

I do not know why it is 90% liberal around here. An almost monolithic dedication to all things liberal/progressive/socialist. Apparently he made a similar observation.

Jesus loves you too.

How bout this possibility:D...9 of 10 emails i get on politics are anti-Obama...
Not this nightmare scenario huh:eek:


HOW SWEET IT IS NOW KNOWING THAT REPUBLICAN PRICKS ARE LYING AWAKE AT NIGHT, SWEATING & WORRYING ABOUT A "THIRD TERM" FOR THE "MUSLIM" !!!

----


-


I "Googled" this fact, and apparently it is a fact. He can serve if he hasn't been elected.

Heartburn, gas, and parnoia to boot. Who dreams up these potential nightmares?




I'm not sure about the premiss but it is a scary thought






Here's something to give us all a sleepless night or two . . . . . .
The Facts:
· Obama can run as Vice President on the Biden-Obama ticket in 2016, but Obama cannot be “elected” for a 3 rd term as President.

· Obama can assume the Presidency if Biden dies or resigns at any time after the inauguration. Obama would become President
because he would not be “elected” to the office

· Joe Biden was born November 20, 1942 and he will be 74 prior to the inauguration in January 2017.

· Obama can retain control over the Dem party and its funds until 2020.

· A Biden-Obama ticket can win in 2016 if the Dem loyalties are unified and the GOP loyalties are split .

Why does this matter:

1. The Dems would retain control of the government bureaucracy until 2020

2. The Dems would retain Veto power over the Congress

3. The Dems would retain control of the Attorney General’s office and define what is prosecuted and what is not

4. The Dems would retain control over the appointments of Federal judges

5. The Dems would be in a position to replace up to 2 or 3 of the Supreme Court Justices

6. The Dems would use Executive Orders to make temporary laws and protect progressive principles

7. The Dems would protect Obamacare, EPA overreach, progressive moves to socialism, disintegration of the military, illegal imigration, deficit spending, etc.

8. The President would pardon all of the Dems who could be prosecuted if a Repub is elected later

9. The Federal bureaucracy would be used to further Dem ideals, ability to stay in power, and stifle opposing movements

10. Other?

it's an inside joke...

Lol, gr.

I have never understood why some are so concerned about how often someone posts, or what room.
This is one of two sites I post on. It has rooms, some I visit, some i don't. Same as everyone else I'd wager.
Strange.....

One of the things I like about the Politics Board on this site is that it has a mix of political spectrums posting. Most sites eventually end up with commenters who all lean the same way, and that gets boring to follow.

But yeah, I also can't find the energy to care who posts where and how often. That said, if some folk get something out of getting outraged about it, that's cool. If they have always aspired to being a MSMG (Middle School Mean Girl), far be it from me to stomp on their dreams. ;)

:D
i like that 'msmg' acronym.

Huma (referring to Hill in an email): "She's often confused."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-r...ften-confused/

Hillary explains, "I come from the 60s."
:D

her comments at the debate, invoking 9-11 as defense for taking wall street money, was beyond the pale.
her husband signed the repeal of glass/steagall, and they love giving her funds..
a huge weak point for her.

Um, how about the omission of anything similar to the term "Islamic Terrorism" when the Paris was the day before?

And guess what - they (the Democratic leadership, especially Debbie Wasserman Shultz) are taking great pains to hide these debates by putting them on a weekend when many will not see them.

They are all in on protecting Hillary. And she needs the protection.

She has not had a real question in forever. A glass house in fear of pebbles, let alone the boulders that are out there.

there's been some criticisms of DWS, with good reason. but not nearly as much as one would expect, given the stakes.

You're right. But once they co-opted the press, they were able to mute a lot of that.

co-opt the press?
the criticism i saw was from the press, else i wouldn't have known of any criticisms. now, the dem party might be closemouthed about it, thus hindering any further reporting. stand united and all that rot.

He's baaaaack and given his track record of being woefully wrong in backing the presidential candidates I guess Hillary is the lock of the century. And that really sucks:(