Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Kagan ? (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36017)

SOREHOOF 05-10-2010 06:49 PM

Kagan ?
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...a_n_570937.htm

Hooo Boy!:tro:

dellinger63 05-10-2010 07:09 PM

Like I said before wish he'd take the same approach to hiring pilots. Maybe someone w/o the restrictions of training could do better is all I'm saying and save the world by saving fuel taking a more direct route etc etc…! Who knows better than one with no experience?

geeker2 05-10-2010 07:48 PM

Finally - some eye candy on the Supreme Court :rolleyes:

GBBob 05-10-2010 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOREHOOF (Post 645956)

I was wondering what took so long for you boys to post..mm..She's 50..That means at LEAST 25 more years of the votes to offset the Scalia/Roberts militia. As I have said here before...this is why I will always vote Liberal for Prex...the Supreme Court nominees..

randallscott35 05-10-2010 07:53 PM

:eek:
Quote:

Originally Posted by geeker2 (Post 645977)
Finally - some eye candy on the Supreme Court :rolleyes:

:eek::D

timmgirvan 05-10-2010 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob (Post 645978)
I was wondering what took so long for you boys to post..mm..She's 50..That means at LEAST 25 more years of the votes to offset the Scalia/Roberts militia. As I have said here before...this is why I will always vote Liberal for Prex...the Supreme Court nominees..

she get 2 votes?:eek:

dellinger63 05-10-2010 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geeker2 (Post 645977)
Finally - some eye candy on the Supreme Court :rolleyes:

Bet she's been w/more girls than I have!

dellinger63 05-10-2010 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob (Post 645978)
I was wondering what took so long for you boys to post..mm..She's 50..That means at LEAST 25 more years of the votes to offset the Scalia/Roberts militia. As I have said here before...this is why I will always vote Liberal for Prex...the Supreme Court nominees..

a bathing suit layout? God will need to Bless America if she gets thru....I'm sure the 'good' guys can come up with more than a pubic hair on this one.

hi_im_god 05-10-2010 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 645964)
Like I said before wish he'd take the same approach to hiring pilots. Maybe someone w/o the restrictions of training could do better is all I'm saying and save the world by saving fuel taking a more direct route etc etc…! Who knows better than one with no experience?


just off the top of my head reagan nominated sandra day o'connor as a justice and eisenhower earl warren as chief justice, both with no experience on the bench. thurgood marshall was another. it's a good thing to have someone who hasn't spent their entire career dealing with other lawyer's only as supplicant's.

i'm more concerned with what it signals about our society that with stevens gone, there'll be no veteran of the armed forces on the supreme court. elites just don't serve any more.

the republicans will do what they must to rally their base but ultimately the court is more conservative after 2 obama appointee's than it was before. he's gone with 2 safe picks. i don't expect much of a fight.

Danzig 05-10-2010 08:34 PM

Maybe I'm just in a foul mood but I get so goddamned tired of the typical bashing that occurs with female nominees. She isn't attractive, she's masculine. Now we just need that she looks like a bitch for it to be complete. Ridiculous. Think about what is said about a nomd guy, and then the posts above. Think of what most remarks are about palin, or hillary and cankles. So frustrating!!

GBBob 05-10-2010 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan (Post 645980)
she get 2 votes?:eek:

She's a lock

randallscott35 05-10-2010 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 646001)
Maybe I'm just in a foul mood but I get so goddamned tired of the typical bashing that occurs with female nominees. She isn't attractive, she's masculine. Now we just need that she looks like a bitch for it to be complete. Ridiculous. Think about what is said about a nomd guy, and then the posts above. Think of what most remarks are about palin, or hillary and cankles. So frustrating!!

No one said Scalia was Brad Pitt? She's a mess to look at but I don't care. Do the job.

Danzig 05-10-2010 08:43 PM

I don't recall any comments about a guys looksa in a similar situation. None. Obama was questioned about experience. Palin was talked about as being a milf. Can't remember ever seeing a reference to a 'dilf'.

randallscott35 05-10-2010 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 646005)
I don't recall any comments about a guys looksa in a similar situation. None. Obama was questioned about experience. Palin was talked about as being a milf. Can't remember ever seeing a reference to a 'dilf'.

Not true. Women couldn't see through that phony Edwards b/c they liked his appearance.

hi_im_god 05-10-2010 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 646007)
Not true. Women couldn't see through that phony Edwards b/c they liked his appearance.

i think her point was that every woman goes through this. one opposing example doesn't defeat that point.

i'd throw in the towel on this one. she's right. and you know she's right.

why argue?

dellinger63 05-10-2010 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 646005)
I don't recall any comments about a guys looksa in a similar situation. None. Obama was questioned about experience. Palin was talked about as being a milf. Can't remember ever seeing a reference to a 'dilf'.

'DILF' is all to do with 'hope' and nothing to do with realty. If it ever did it would then be called 'DD' as in 'Done Deal'.

randallscott35 05-10-2010 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 646010)
i think her point was that every woman goes through this. one opposing example doesn't defeat that point.

i'd throw in the towel on this one. she's right. and you know she's right.

why argue?

:wf

timmgirvan 05-10-2010 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob (Post 646002)
She's a lock

I was asking you if she get to vote twice to counter Roberts/Scalia?
Lighten up,GBBob:)

GBBob 05-10-2010 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan (Post 646016)
I was asking you if she get to vote twice to counter Roberts/Scalia?
Lighten up,GBBob:)

Sorry...thought you were Randall:wf

:D

Danzig 05-10-2010 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 646010)
i think her point was that every woman goes through this. one opposing example doesn't defeat that point.

i'd throw in the towel on this one. she's right. and you know she's right.

why argue?

Thanks god. I'd apologize for the blasphemy but you'd know it wasn't sincere

And I thought edwards looked like a sleazy used car salesman!

timmgirvan 05-10-2010 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob (Post 646018)
Sorry...thought you were Randall:wf

:D

now you're going to piss off Randall!:eek:

randallscott35 05-10-2010 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan (Post 646020)
now you're going to piss off Randall!:eek:

Not at all.:wf

GBBob 05-10-2010 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 646021)
Not at all.:wf

Exactly

ateamstupid 05-10-2010 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 646001)
Maybe I'm just in a foul mood but I get so goddamned tired of the typical bashing that occurs with female nominees. She isn't attractive, she's masculine. Now we just need that she looks like a bitch for it to be complete. Ridiculous. Think about what is said about a nomd guy, and then the posts above. Think of what most remarks are about palin, or hillary and cankles. So frustrating!!

That's how you know Zig's mad. She starts using capital letters.

Danzig 05-10-2010 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 646027)
That's how you know Zig's mad. She starts using capital letters.

lol

no, that's how you know i'm on the blackberry. it automatically does that...so annoying!!

SOREHOOF 05-10-2010 11:16 PM

Just what America needs, another Harvard genius like the ones who have been running what's left of this country for the past 30 years.

Whatever.

ArlJim78 05-11-2010 12:13 AM

I didn't think I would see another nominee as week as Harriet Miers, but sure enough here we go. Of course if you want to send up a radical socialist you would tend to go with a person with little record to go on. Most likely another trojan horse like Obama.

Rupert Pupkin 05-11-2010 12:39 AM

Senator Inofe is opposing her. That is no surprise but I think he makes some good points. Here is a piece of what he had to say about her:

“While her service as the Dean of Harvard Law School is an impressive credential, decisions she made in that role demonstrated poor judgment. While there, she banned the U.S. military from recruiting on campus, an issue very important to me. She took the issue even further when she joined with other law school officials in a lawsuit to overturn the Solomon amendment, which was adopted by Congress to ensure that schools could not deny military recruiters access to college campuses. Claiming the Solomon Amendment was ‘immoral,’ she filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in Rumsfeld v. F.A.I.R opposing the Amendment. The Court unanimously ruled against her position and affirmed that the Solomon Amendment was constitutional."

That is from Senator Inofe's website.

http://inhofe.senate.gov/public/inde...6-e0c7020cdff5

ateamstupid 05-11-2010 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 646062)
lol

no, that's how you know i'm on the blackberry. it automatically does that...so annoying!!

TEAM BLACKBERRY!!! :{>:

joeydb 05-11-2010 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 645987)
Bet she's been w/more girls than I have!

LOL

Antitrust32 05-11-2010 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 646005)
I don't recall any comments about a guys looksa in a similar situation. None. Obama was questioned about experience. Palin was talked about as being a milf. Can't remember ever seeing a reference to a 'dilf'.

i think Palin was talked about being a milf because that her only good quality.

Antitrust32 05-11-2010 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin (Post 646085)
Senator Inofe is opposing her. That is no surprise but I think he makes some good points. Here is a piece of what he had to say about her:

“While her service as the Dean of Harvard Law School is an impressive credential, decisions she made in that role demonstrated poor judgment. While there, she banned the U.S. military from recruiting on campus, an issue very important to me. She took the issue even further when she joined with other law school officials in a lawsuit to overturn the Solomon amendment, which was adopted by Congress to ensure that schools could not deny military recruiters access to college campuses. Claiming the Solomon Amendment was ‘immoral,’ she filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in Rumsfeld v. F.A.I.R opposing the Amendment. The Court unanimously ruled against her position and affirmed that the Solomon Amendment was constitutional."

That is from Senator Inofe's website.

http://inhofe.senate.gov/public/inde...6-e0c7020cdff5


I have a ton of respect for her doing that.. and I love the military.

DADT is embarassingly immoral.

Princess Doreen 05-11-2010 07:59 AM

I don't care what she looks like. I don't care what her sexual practices are. She's a liberal replacing a liberal. Did anyone expect anything different?!~

GBBob 05-11-2010 08:14 AM

[quote=Princess Doreen;646118]I don't care what she looks like. I don't care what her sexual practices are. She's a liberal replacing a liberal. Did anyone expect anything different?!~[/QUOTE]

Exactly and nope

Danzig 05-11-2010 09:02 AM

of course no one expects anything different. not regarding the pick, or the reaction to the pick.

Patrick333 05-11-2010 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 645987)
Bet she's been w/more girls than I have!

:D:D Without a doubt.

Rupert Pupkin 05-11-2010 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 646103)
I have a ton of respect for her doing that.. and I love the military.

DADT is embarassingly immoral.

It was nor her job to impose her views on everyone else. If she thinks that DADT is immoral, that is fine. She is entitled to her opinion. But it was not her place to try to keep the military off campus because of her disapproval of DADT.

Talk about immoral. It was immoral for her to try to restrict access to campus to a group that is entitled by law to have access to the campus.

dellinger63 05-11-2010 03:38 PM

I wonder how many Harvard students enlist per year? Seems to me she probably, inadvertently saved the military the time and cost of travel. Almost Nobel Prize worthy!

Antitrust32 05-11-2010 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin (Post 646294)
It was nor her job to impose her views on everyone else. If she thinks that DADT is immoral, that is fine. She is entitled to her opinion. But it was not her place to try to keep the military off campus because of her disapproval of DADT.

Talk about immoral. It was immoral for her to try to restrict access to campus to a group that is entitled by law to have access to the campus.

Actually, if you read into it a little.. you will find out that Harvard has an anti-discrimination policy, which she felt, and over 30 other colleges also felt the exact same way, that DADT violated her school's policy. (she is correct there)

AND, she didnt ban them from campus.. She banned them for having an office building on campus.

She had every right to stand up for her school's policy and for what is right. If people never stood up for what is right, nothing good would ever happen.

miraja2 05-11-2010 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 646001)
I get so goddamned tired of the typical bashing that occurs with female nominees. She isn't attractive, she's masculine. Now we just need that she looks like a bitch for it to be complete. Ridiculous. Think about what is said about a nomd guy, and then the posts above. Think of what most remarks are about palin, or hillary and cankles. So frustrating!!

:tro:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.