100k to win...
 

On Super Saver.
If I won this I think I would have actually went with the filly, but thats easy to say just sitting here at home.

they are actually showing them make the cash bet with the teller. Good Promotion. 800,000 if he wins

I'd seriously go with Line of David instead of Super Saver.

betting on borel probably...


my sentimental fave is the filly. would love to see a gal win it. maybe it'd put some of the eight belles stuff to rest.

What kind of impact did that have on Super Saver's odds given a lot of money is bet on him and on Calvin already? I wondered how much the 8-1 drop to 7-1 was that, and how much was just a bunch of last minute runs to the windows. Surely it's a boatload of money as is. Can the needle really move that much with 100K at this point?

OMG

That dude just won a shitload of cash.

Wow :eek: I don't know who's a luckier, Calvin or that win bet guy.

Great race!

he can buy a new hairpiece!!!! alot of them!!!

That guy was one happy dude :tro:

:D

Would love to be in his shoes! And POCKETS! :D

What was the winner's share for the race? Just wanting to compare to what that guy got.

Purse $1.2 mil

Toupe guy $800,000

With that money he can buy a new toupe

tax free too

I don't think so

Bob Costas wears a piece?

lol

i seriously doubt that.

just for men i think.

I would love to have to pay the taxes on that bet.

My broke a s s would be doin the CHA CHA CHA.............

Why wouldnt it? Its less than 600 times the base wager.

because he won a contest to begin with-he didn't bet his own money. but i wish i had the problem of figuring it all out.

Probably only has to pay taxes on the 100k

Very cool!

Actually I think he will only have to pay taxes on gambling income of 800k and prize money of 100k.

Another gem from the board genious. Every time you post, this should be the response. :zz:

I would plan on paying on the whole thing. Nice problem to have.

I think he was joking

I dont understand how he needs to pay taxes on the 800k he recieved from CD. He/NBC placed a 100k win bet which which ended up being only 8 times the amount of the base wager. IRS comes into place only if its 600 times.

I can see that he would need to pay taxes on the 100k prize money. Whatever it is, the guy did not have to put a single dime of his own money to win all that. Great win for him.

The irs cannot track the type of income you are describing but when he gets a 1099 on the 100k that is a huge red flag.
Gambling income is supposed to be reported no matter how small. Most people don't report it and the irs doesn't persue small potatoes.

Good news for him is someone at the IRS undoubtedly saw him win it. Enjoy that complimentary audit.

IMO he should pay taxes on the 90,000.00 from NBC as ordinary income (which I believe with his $900k win puts him in the top bracket of I think 35%), I think he can treat the first $10k from NBC as a gift (and tax free)... So, once you get that tax situation squared away, I think he's paying 20% on the winning from the track (which is better than his ordinary income rate of 35%)... unless of course he's got $900k in losing tickets:):) The best thing for this guy is that he lives in TX with no state income tax, so winning $800k on national TV shouldn't matter to his home state.

That sounds right.

I thought if it was over a certain amount the IRS would step in to get their share regardless of how much was wagered. I'd bet they will be greeting him at the windows.

I'm not positive but I always thought that they (the tellers) only ask for ID if it is a reportable winner (over $600 on a wager that paid 300-1 odds.) If the amount collected is over 5k they remove 20% to immediatly pay the irs.

In this guys case he brings the suitcase (or check) home and then calls his tax consultant to see how much to pay the irs quarterly for the remainder of the year so he doesn't incur any interest penalties.

Ugh. Another freakin tard.

Do I really need to spell out everything I say so that idiots don't misconstrue my meaning?

Here goes.

I was not saying Line of David had a better chance of winning the race than Super Saver. What I was saying, in admittedly far too few words, was that hey, Line of David just beat Super Saver while Super Saver had EVERY possible chance to pass him in the stretch, and he could not get by him.

If you are going to place a bet for $100k on one horse, why not take it on a horse that just outgamed your horse AND is also what, 2-3 times the price?

Obviously Super Saver was the more likely winner, but was he really more than three times likely to win?

The way I see it, there were three possible approaches to playing that $100k bet.

1. Play the most likely winner.
2. Play the longest shot in the race (which would have worked beautifully in the Bluegrass 10k contest).
3. Play the horse with the best possible payout that has the most likely chance of winning.

I believe most people would go with the first approach. The second approach would be reasonable for a race that is a complete clusterfugg, like the Bluegrass was.

The third approach is going to usually be the most sensible one, and I personally didn't think Super Saver was some sort of mortal lock that could not lose. Hence, why not take a flyer on Line of David?

By the way, I'm not sure what genious means. Did you mean genius? Or maybe genie-ous? Like I have some sort of blink my eyes, grant your wish type powers?

I'm going to blink you a brain. Let me know how you like it.