Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Stupidest thing I've read today (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=35400)

The Indomitable DrugS 04-08-2010 01:17 PM

Stupidest thing I've read today
 
http://www.drf.com/news/article/112005.html


Even if he wasn't a son of Cuvee ... it's still very stupid.


He does deserve special mention for being the nicest 2-year-old to race at PID last year anyway.

randallscott35 04-08-2010 01:18 PM

12 panels should be right in his wheelhouse.

NTamm1215 04-08-2010 01:19 PM

I was just going to post that this is a race where he has a great chance to finish last.

NT

randallscott35 04-08-2010 01:20 PM

This where someone comes in and says his dams side will carry him the whole way. LOL

The Indomitable DrugS 04-08-2010 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 633685)
12 panels should be right in his wheelhouse.

He always seems to get hit in the head by the 1/16th pole... and he hasn't gone 9fs yet .. let alone 12f.

randallscott35 04-08-2010 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 633689)
He always seems to get hit in the head by the 1/16th pole... and he hasn't gone 9fs yet .. let alone 12f.

He's just getting moving at 8.5 is all...You wait!

randallscott35 04-08-2010 01:24 PM

If a Borrego can win first out at 4.5 then NP can surely win the Coyote Lakes stakes at AQ

Scav 04-08-2010 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 633683)
http://www.drf.com/news/article/112005.html


Even if he wasn't a son of Cuvee ... it's still very stupid.


He does deserve special mention for being the nicest 2-year-old to race at PID last year anyway.


Not just today, but the stupidest thing I have heard in a long time.

McPeek was also on TVG last week yapping about how Bold Start should love Keeneland's turf course and how it favors front runners in turf routes.

I think the last time I looked they were like 2 for 80 or something gate to wire turf routes.

Kasept 04-08-2010 01:35 PM

Hold up a second... It's a mistake to think that running 1.5 miles there is anything like running 1.5 miles here. The Epsom Derby is won in 2:32.0-2:36.0, or in other words, about 5 seconds slower than the Belmont. As nuts as McPeek may be, I wouldn't be so dismissive of this concept. It's horses galloping for a seven-eighths of a mile and finishing the last five-eighths with a flourish. It's not an American Classic dirt race.

randallscott35 04-08-2010 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept (Post 633696)
Hold up a second... It's a mistake to think that running 1.5 miles there is anything like running 1.5 miles here. The Epsom Derby is won in 2:32.0-2:36.0, or in other words, about 5 seconds slower than the Belmont. As nuts as McPeek may be, I wouldn't be so dismissive of this concept. It's horses galloping for a seven-eighths of a mile and finishing the last five-eighths with a flourish. It's not an American Classic dirt race.

Pace or none, 12 panels on the turf is a long way...Cuvee doesn't help.

the_fat_man 04-08-2010 01:42 PM

Yeah. Here's a horse that hasn't sniffed a good trip in 4 straight races. And we have nothing better to do than trash him. Maybe he doesn't get 12F but put him BEHIND horses and make a ****in' timely move (for once) with him and he's certainly not embarrassing himself.

The Indomitable DrugS 04-08-2010 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept (Post 633696)
Hold up a second... It's a mistake to think that running 1.5 miles there is anything like running 1.5 miles here. The Epsom Derby is won in 2:32.0-2:36.0, or in other words, about 5 seconds slower than the Belmont. As nuts as McPeek may be, I wouldn't be so dismissive of this concept. It's horses galloping for a seven-eighths of a mile and finishing the last five-eighths with a flourish. It's not an American Classic dirt race.


Steve, You're out of your mind on this one. You are totally overthinking it.

The final times are slower because the course is extremely demanding and you run uphill for part of it.

They don't call the race "the supreme test of a thoroughbred" because it's easy for a horse by Cuvee out of a Clever Trick mare to see out the distance.

How do our best American turf horses do when we travel to Dubai for the turf marathons? Hell, the Euro's only ship in a few each year for the BC Turf and they always seem to kick our asses in that race on our own soil.

philcski 04-08-2010 01:59 PM

McPeek has some kind of fascination with the Epsom Derby...

tector 04-08-2010 02:00 PM

The day's not over....

The Indomitable DrugS 04-08-2010 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tector (Post 633706)
The day's not over....

It's a strong leader in the clubhoue though.

Maybe Pletcher has his eyes set on the Grand National with Discreetly Mine.

randallscott35 04-08-2010 02:11 PM

85/50 thinking BC Marathon. Plenty of turns to bolt on.

The Indomitable DrugS 04-08-2010 02:21 PM

Here was Cuvee.



Just missed the CD track record for 4.5fs in his debut - and set a 20 3/5th opening quarter while dueling in his first start as a 3yo.

His Saratoga Special win in the slop was spectacular.

VOL JACK 04-08-2010 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski (Post 633705)
McPeek has some kind of fascination with the Epsom Derby...

McPeaked is a tool.

The Indomitable DrugS 04-08-2010 02:44 PM

If Dubai Millenniumm had only ducked the Epsom Derby ... I think he would probably be considered the consensus best horse from last decade over Ghostzapper.


Pedigree Ann 04-08-2010 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 633697)
Pace or none, 12 panels on the turf is a long way...Cuvee doesn't help.

It also is uphill for a half-mile after the start and for the last half-mile. Even as good a miler as Blushing Groom couldn't last for that uphill finish.

randallscott35 04-08-2010 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 633714)
If Dubai Millenniumm had only ducked the Epsom Derby ... I think he would probably be considered the consensus best horse from last decade over Ghostzapper.


Mineshaft was a better horse and for a trainer that wasn't a cheat. How the great DrugS could not see this is beyond me.

NTamm1215 04-08-2010 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 633717)
Mineshaft was a better horse and for a trainer that wasn't a cheat. How the great DrugS could not see this is beyond me.

Yeah, Dubai Millennium probably would have been beaten by Perfect Drift as well...I used to get a lot more mystified when reading your signature but now I've gotten used to it. DM would have absolutely throttled Mineshaft.

NT

brockguy 04-08-2010 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 633714)
If Dubai Millenniumm had only ducked the Epsom Derby ... I think he would probably be considered the consensus best horse from last decade over Ghostzapper.

I agree Doug -

Just to add as well that Epsom is the closest a horse will ever get to riding on a rollercoaster - it is just a ridiculous track and you can see every year how it affects plenty of immature horses.

randallscott35 04-08-2010 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215 (Post 633718)
Yeah, Dubai Millennium probably would have been beaten by Perfect Drift as well...I used to get a lot more mystified when reading your signature but now I've gotten used to it. DM would have absolutely throttled Mineshaft.

NT

Great horses lose all the time. Sad that some can't realize that.

The Indomitable DrugS 04-08-2010 03:15 PM

Mineshaft kind of sucked before he got lasix.

He was a brand new horse with lasix obviously.

His lifetime PP's can be found here from an Illman blog link...

http://community.drf.com/files/discr...e-family-1.pdf

randallscott35 04-08-2010 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 633721)
Mineshaft kind of sucked before he got lasix.

He was a brand new horse with lasix obviously.

His lifetime PP's can be found here from an Illman blog link...

http://community.drf.com/files/discr...e-family-1.pdf


That's nice.

Scav 04-08-2010 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav (Post 633693)
Not just today, but the stupidest thing I have heard in a long time.

McPeek was also on TVG last week yapping about how Bold Start should love Keeneland's turf course and how it favors front runners in turf routes.

I think the last time I looked they were like 2 for 80 or something gate to wire turf routes.

LOL!

McPeek is god!

NTamm1215 04-08-2010 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 633720)
Great horses lose all the time. Sad that some can't realize that.

I recognize that great horses lose all the time. However, I also judge them based on who they beat. The band of horses he beat up on in 2003 was far, far, far from impressive.

NT

The Indomitable DrugS 04-08-2010 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215 (Post 633727)
I recognize that great horses lose all the time. However, I also judge them based on who they beat. The band of horses he beat up on in 2003 was far, far, far from impressive.

NT

They weren't bad ... but when horses like Candy Ride, Medaglia D'Oro, and Congaree are around ... and he's not beating them ... the opposition is going to seem terrible.

Perfect Drift was an excellent horse when he beat Mineshaft - and Mineshaft ran the better race of the two in defeat anyway.

I think Mineshaft (with lasix) might have toyed with Invasor. But yeah, He's obviously not even close to being the best horse since '80 and the collection of horses he beat is not very impressive at all.

randallscott35 04-08-2010 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 633732)
They weren't bad ... but when horses like Candy Ride, Medaglia D'Oro, and Congaree are around ... and he's not beating them ... the opposition is going to seem terrible.

Perfect Drift was an excellent horse when he beat Mineshaft - and Mineshaft ran the better race of the two in defeat anyway.

I think Mineshaft (with lasix) might have toyed with Invasor. But yeah, He's obviously not even close to being the best horse since '80 and the collection of horses he beat is not very impressive at all.

We'll never know whether he could've run a 130 Beyer with Frankel now will we...He'll be a hell of a lot better in the shed than Ghostzapper, we all know that.

tector 04-08-2010 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 633720)
Great horses lose all the time. Sad that some can't realize that.

Secretariat lost 3 times as 3 year old (all those "W" races)--that is all anyone need know on this subject.

As far as Mineshaft goes, very nice horse, but he couldn't carry Spectacular Bid's jock strap (assuming he could have one).

randallscott35 04-08-2010 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tector (Post 633734)
Secretariat lost 3 times as 3 year old (all those "W" races)--that is all anyone need know on this subject.

As far as Mineshaft goes, very nice horse, but he couldn't carry Spectacular Bid's jock strap (assuming he could have one).

I agree with that, I've never said he was better than Bid.

tector 04-08-2010 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 633735)
I agree with that, I've never said he was better than Bid.

Fair enough, but you have him in the same sentence--too close for me.

There is a decent enough argument that SB was the greatest American horse of my lifetime, which is now approaching half a century. You can make decent arguments for a very few others as well. Mineshaft is not one of them. As long as we both know that, we're OK.

randallscott35 04-08-2010 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tector (Post 633741)
Fair enough, but you have him in the same sentence--too close for me.

There is a decent enough argument that SB was the greatest American horse of my lifetime, which is now approaching half a century. You can make decent arguments for a very few others as well. Mineshaft is not one of them. As long as we both know that, we're OK.

I agree with all of that.

AeWingnut 04-08-2010 04:22 PM

did Hard Buck finish up the track in the Epsom

quitters never win
and winners never quit

but those that never win and never quit
are idiots

Kasept 04-08-2010 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AeWingnut (Post 633746)
did Hard Buck finish up the track in the Epsom

quitters never win
and winners never quit

but those that never win and never quit
are idiots

He ran at Ascot. Was 2nd in the Grp I King George.

Scav 04-08-2010 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept (Post 633777)
He ran at Ascot. Was 2nd in the Grp I King George.

Wasn't it off like a three day layoff also?

MISTERGEE 04-08-2010 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 633721)
Mineshaft kind of sucked before he got lasix.

He was a brand new horse with lasix obviously.

His lifetime PP's can be found here from an Illman blog link...

http://community.drf.com/files/discr...e-family-1.pdf

wow, sucked with beyers of 103,104,107 ?
I wonder how many horses have strung together 7 straight beyers of 114 and above. Must be pretty rare.

AeWingnut 04-08-2010 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MISTERGEE (Post 633783)
wow, sucked with beyers of 103,104,107 ?
I wonder how many horses have strung together 7 straight beyers of 114 and above. Must be pretty rare.

Maybe he meant before he came to the States

those are some good numbers he ran without lasix
not that lasix does much besides help keep them from bleeding
am I right?

outofthebox 04-08-2010 06:54 PM

I remember when McPeek was yapping about running Dream Empress in the Oaks over in the U.K.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.