Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Prop 8 Sucks (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26096)

letswastemoney 11-07-2008 06:58 PM

Prop 8 Sucks
 
I live in CA. We always vote a democratic president, yet we voted for this discriminatory nonsense? Who cares if gays want to get married? It doesn't affect anyone!

And the thing about kids learning about gay marriage...OF COURSE they would learn about it. Just as they learn about when women got the right to vote, when blacks became free from slavery, etc. etc. I'd be disappointed if this wasn't in their history books.

No one is forcing you to become gay. Just because gays get married doesn't mean you and your children suddenly become gay as well. Prop 8 is disgusting in all areas!

letswastemoney 11-07-2008 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmfhb411
aren't these protesters gathering in front of a Mormon temple ?

Yes. Ironically though, it was the rise in black voters that pushed it through.

SCUDSBROTHER 11-07-2008 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmfhb411
Now since we have no reason to believe the protesters are short
of high intellect..............
there next move will be to march into predominantly African-American communities.

Why not target your biggest opponents ? Makes sense right ?

Mormons put the cash up for this prop 8. Checks came flying in to Cali from Utah. It's public(the address of people donating.) Like every 2nd or 3rd name is Utah. It's one thing for our own state's bigots to be doing it, but I don't like people from Utah getting involved in the business of another state. So, that church (or cult) deserves all this backlash.

SCUDSBROTHER 11-07-2008 09:10 PM

Anybody really believe Melissa Ethridge's claim that she isn't gunna pay her taxes now? Don't know why they're freaking out, they have been discriminated against all their life. Ain't like they have a new challenge or something.

Danzig 11-07-2008 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Anybody really believe Melissa Ethridge's claim that she isn't gunna pay her taxes now? Don't know why they're freaking out, they have been discriminated against all their life. Ain't like they have a new challenge or something.

taxation without representation. seems we've had something big come out of that in the past.

hi_im_god 11-08-2008 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Mormons put the cash up for this prop 8. Checks came flying in to Cali from Utah. It's public(the address of people donating.) Like every 2nd or 3rd name is Utah. It's one thing for our own state's bigots to be doing it, but I don't like people from Utah getting involved in the business of another state. So, that church (or cult) deserves all this backlash.

in an ironic twist, gays now back banning same sect marriage. say children born of such unions have a higher chance of being mormonsexual.

Antitrust32 11-08-2008 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by letswastemoney
I live in CA. We always vote a democratic president, yet we voted for this discriminatory nonsense? Who cares if gays want to get married? It doesn't affect anyone!

And the thing about kids learning about gay marriage...OF COURSE they would learn about it. Just as they learn about when women got the right to vote, when blacks became free from slavery, etc. etc. I'd be disappointed if this wasn't in their history books.

No one is forcing you to become gay. Just because gays get married doesn't mean you and your children suddenly become gay as well. Prop 8 is disgusting in all areas!

:tro: Amen brother.

Antitrust32 11-08-2008 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by letswastemoney
Yes. Ironically though, it was the rise in black voters that pushed it through.


I can not see how ONE black person could vote to not have equal rights... they of all people should understand.

Its sick and they should be ashamed. Anyone who voted Yes for any of these Props (in az, ca and fl) should be very ashamed of themselves.

letswastemoney 11-08-2008 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
I can not see how ONE black person could vote to not have equal rights... they of all people should understand.

Its sick and they should be ashamed. Anyone who voted Yes for any of these Props (in az, ca and fl) should be very ashamed of themselves.

I think they vote for the Democrats because of economics. But in all other issues like this, they seem conservative.

ateamstupid 11-08-2008 02:44 PM

I'm shocked, SHOCKED that black people don't like gays. Who woulda thunk it?

What's really sad is that no other race (white, hispanic or asian) could do better than a 50/50 split to make up for the predictably homophobic black vote.

hi_im_god 11-08-2008 03:21 PM

it blows that no one has bitten on the easy jokes about the thread title.

AeWingnut 11-10-2008 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by letswastemoney
I think they vote for the Democrats because of economics. But in all other issues like this, they seem conservative.

I hear people saying that they are voting dem for the economy and I just don't see it. How is taking my money and spending it on stuff I would never support good for the economy?

Most pols run conservative and govern as liberals

Divorce lawyers are extremely bummed that Prop 8 was voted down but don't worry the gov & courts will ram it down everyone's throat


:rolleyes:

bad choice fo words

SCUDSBROTHER 11-10-2008 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AeWingnut
I hear people saying that they are voting dem for the economy and I just don't see it.

That meant that Blacks traditionally vote for Dems, because Dems care more about the poor than the Reps. One look at the Republican Convention Audience, and they can see exactly who that party favors.

Coach Pants 11-10-2008 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god
it blows that no one has bitten on the easy jokes about the thread title.


AeWingnut 11-10-2008 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
That meant that Blacks traditionally vote for Dems, because Dems care more about the poor than the Reps. One look at the Republican Convention Audience, and they can see exactly who that party favors.


Doesn't mean they weren't invited

GenuineRisk 11-10-2008 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AeWingnut
I hear people saying that they are voting dem for the economy and I just don't see it. How is taking my money and spending it on stuff I would never support good for the economy?

Why do you hate our soldiers?

GenuineRisk 11-10-2008 08:59 PM

Seneca Falls was in 1849, and the Nineteenth Amendment wasn't until 1920. Equality takes a while. Was is Dr. King who said the arc of history is long, but it bends towards justice?

This is definitely a step back, which stinks. And I wish the gov't would take away the Mormon church's tax exempt status for this, as it sure seems that they were involving themselves in politics in ways that violate that status. Not to mention the gov't could use the tax money. ;)

Antitrust, I'm with you in that it makes no sense to me- discrimination is discrimination, but, unfortunately, a lot of people don't see it that way. A lot of African-Americans are very religious, and the American Christian faith is not particularly open to homosexuality.

Those of you with newly-minted Democrat representatives (or Republican ones who are social liberals), it would be worth writing them and asking them to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act. It was a bad law; one of the worst days work Clinton ever was did signing it, and it needs to go. Time for two more steps forward.

fpsoxfan 11-11-2008 07:24 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 1070

GenuineRisk 11-12-2008 12:58 PM

Interesting article from fivethirtyeight.com dispelling the idea that Prop 8 is the fault of minority voters:

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/...p-8-myths.html

Fivethirtyeight was frighteningly accurate in its predictions about the election. There was an article in New York Magazine about the founder- he started as a baseball stat compiler.

Antitrust32 11-12-2008 01:01 PM

:tro: Well... Connecticut decided to do the morally right thing today! :tro:

GenuineRisk 11-12-2008 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
:tro: Well... Connecticut decided to do the morally right thing today! :tro:

Hurray for one "C" state doing what's right! East Coast represents!

Danzig 11-12-2008 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmfhb411
I will say the result of elections isn't the fault of any group of voters,
whether we like the outcome or not.
People vote------> majority wins.

Is anyone just as outraged the people of Massachusetts weren't given the opportunity
to vote for, or against gay marriage ?

so...if the majority voted to get rid of the rights to a free press, would that be ok? to stifle free speech, expression?

once again, majority does NOT rule. the constitution is supposed to rule,and all laws that are passed must stand that test. so, does a law that treats some citizens as less equal than others belong in the land of the free? what happened to all being created equal? life, liberty, etc, etc.

Antitrust32 11-12-2008 02:10 PM

Zig if you were not married and were gay I'd be taking you to Connecticut right now!!

:wf

GenuineRisk 11-12-2008 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
so...if the majority voted to get rid of the rights to a free press, would that be ok? to stifle free speech, expression?

once again, majority does NOT rule. the constitution is supposed to rule,and all laws that are passed must stand that test. so, does a law that treats some citizens as less equal than others belong in the land of the free? what happened to all being created equal? life, liberty, etc, etc.

Darn straight, Danzig. It took a court decision to make it legal for interracial couples to marry- if that one had been left to the voters, I suspect some states would STILL have laws on the books against it.

Or as the US State info site puts it on the "What is Democracy" page under "Majority Rule and Minority Rights":

"The rights of minorities do not depend upon the goodwill of the majority and cannot be eliminated by majority vote. The rights of minorities are protected because democratic laws and institutions protect the rights of all citizens."

http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pub...em/whatdm2.htm

And yeah, certainly it's unfair to blame any group of voters. That said, a lot of incendiary things have been tossed at racial minority voters in the blogosphere since last Tuesday and I thought it was a worthwhile piece on 538- that a lot of what is being said is statistically wrong. Most interesting was the difference in percentages the last time it was on the CA ballot compared with this time. Prop 8 will stand for 4 years at the most. Maybe only 2.

Danzig 11-12-2008 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
Zig if you were not married and were gay I'd be taking you to Connecticut right now!!

:wf


lol

Antitrust32 11-12-2008 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk
Darn straight, Danzig. It took a court decision to make it legal for interracial couples to marry- if that one had been left to the voters, I suspect some states would STILL have laws on the books against it.

Or as the US State info site puts it on the "What is Democracy" page under "Majority Rule and Minority Rights":

"The rights of minorities do not depend upon the goodwill of the majority and cannot be eliminated by majority vote. The rights of minorities are protected because democratic laws and institutions protect the rights of all citizens."

http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pub...em/whatdm2.htm

And yeah, certainly it's unfair to blame any group of voters. That said, a lot of incendiary things have been tossed at racial minority voters in the blogosphere since last Tuesday and I thought it was a worthwhile piece on 538- that a lot of what is being said is statistically wrong. Most interesting was the difference in percentages the last time it was on the CA ballot compared with this time. Prop 8 will stand for 4 years at the most. Maybe only 2.

You are right that its unfair to blame any group of voters.

But I just dont understand how a group of people who have fought for equality and achieved it - how they can vote 70-30 in favor of a prop that takes away equality from a different group of people.

Was talking about this with a very religious black woman I work with - and she doesnt know I'm gay.. & she even said regardless of her personal or religious beliefs - that the government shouldnt be able to take rights away from people - and that people shouldnt be able to vote to take rights away from others. I was surprised to hear this from her - as shes very traditional and morally strict... but I was happy to hear it!!

letswastemoney 11-12-2008 02:48 PM

If a proposition to reinstate slavery existed, there would be plenty of votes for it.

Antitrust32 11-12-2008 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by letswastemoney
If a proposition to reinstate slavery existed, there would be plenty of votes for it.

exactly... Prop 8 & the ones in FL, AZ, an AR were so wrong in so many ways... and they all passed.

What does that say about our country?

I know our neighbors to the north & allies in Europe/Australia/New Zealand etc. laugh at the US about this issue... says it sets us back from the countries that have passed civil unions/gay marriage/equality for all.

Antitrust32 11-12-2008 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmfhb411
apples and oranges. A better arguement can be made the rights for free press
and free speech serve the good of all versus, the legalization of same-sex marriage accomplishing the same overall good.

And let's legalize polygamy while we're at it.


Did you vote for Congressman Murtha?

Antitrust32 11-12-2008 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmfhb411
No there wouldn't. Slavery doesn't serve anyone well.


and discriminating against gays serves everyone well?

Antitrust32 11-12-2008 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmfhb411
sorry that's not discrimination.

please explain how supressing peoples rights because you dont agree with their lifestyle is not discrimination?

SniperSB23 11-12-2008 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmfhb411
That means when polygamists go to the courts for their rights to marry
twenty different underage girls, you'll be OK with it.

Where does the line get drawn ?

I actually wouldn't care. I think the line gets drawn in any case where it isn't marriage between two consenting adults. So no bestiality and no underage marriage. Other than that, who really cares?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.