Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Palin: Does anyone want to bet she doesnt do another interview outside of Fox? (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25027)

dalakhani 09-12-2008 08:37 PM

Palin: Does anyone want to bet she doesnt do another interview outside of Fox?
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z75QSExE0jU



This is why they wouldnt let her give interviews. I am not a politician but i can recite the Bush doctine from memory because it was one of the more polarizing issues of his young presidency. She didnt have a clue.

Did anyone notice that her take on attacking terrorists in Pakistan runs COUNTER TO HER OWN RUNNING MATE'S

ateamstupid 09-12-2008 08:41 PM

You mean Sean Hannity isn't going to hold her feet to the fire next week?

ninetoone 09-12-2008 08:41 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww

pgardn 09-12-2008 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
You mean Sean Hannity isn't going to hold her feet to the fire next week?

He will be suckling off her lactating glands.

The Indomitable DrugS 09-12-2008 08:51 PM

Her role is to pander votes, energize religous whackos, and steal Obama's spotlight in the press.

Don't you think it's a little silly for a reporter to be asking her such serious questions? Next thing you know they will want her to present a ten point plan on issues.

ninetoone 09-12-2008 08:53 PM

6 degrees of Miss South Carolina...

ArlJim78 09-12-2008 10:26 PM

for anyone concerned with facts, (a very small group apparently) the person who orignally defined the Bush Doctrine weighs in.
Gibson had it wrong, and Palin was correct to request the context.

the Bush Doctrine has been redefined 4 times during his eight years.
Gibson did not give the correct current answer.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...091202457.html

dalakhani 09-12-2008 10:40 PM

LOL. You use a link to an OP ED piece by none other than Krauthammer...and you want to question the TRUTH?

BAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA.

She doesnt have a clue and there are people that actually want to defend that which would make them well...clueless.

The least she could do is answer to the party line. She couldnt even do that. She wants to go after terrorists in Pakistan while McCain says NO.

Sorry...no spin today.

ateamstupid 09-12-2008 10:47 PM

Ah yes, Charles Krauthammer, the man who once compared George W. Bush to John F. Kennedy.

dalakhani 09-12-2008 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
Ah yes, Charles Krauthammer, the man who once compared George W. Bush to John F. Kennedy.

The idiot brings up the wikipedia snippet as validity but all it does is say EXACTLY what Gibson did.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Doctrine



And there are fools that want this woman a heartbeat away from the presidency.

ArlJim78 09-12-2008 10:57 PM

as expected, irrational blather.

"BAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA."?

dalakhani 09-12-2008 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
as expected, irrational blather.

"BAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA."?

As expected, idiotic spin.

ateamstupid 09-12-2008 11:07 PM

Jim, you've got to be shitting me with that avatar.

pgardn 09-12-2008 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
Jim, you've got to be shitting me with that avatar.

Its like those WWII posters they put up for Rosy the Riveter.
I gotta love it. People are great here. So much off -beat stuff.

ateamstupid 09-12-2008 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pgardn
Its like those WWII posters they put up for Rosy the Riveter.
I gotta love it. People are great here. So much off -beat stuff.

Oh I get it, but Palin = World War II wives? Really? :zz:

Coach Pants 09-13-2008 12:27 AM

The avatar is great because it upsets people. Mission Accomplished.

Who had the barackolli obama avatar? That's one of my faves.

AeWingnut 09-13-2008 12:42 AM

they do how many minute interiew and snip out all the things that make her look good. All Barakolli has ever done is campaign.


Has anyone brought up the fact that the dumbest man in the senate aka Joe Biden, plagerizes his speeches from crappy little socialist losers.

?

ateamstupid 09-13-2008 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
The avatar is great because it upsets people.

I'm not upset, I'm just once again shaking my head.

Danzig 09-13-2008 08:41 AM

i just saw that tina few may go back to snl and play palin in a skit. if true, i hope i see it. that ought to be good.

TheSpyder 09-13-2008 08:57 AM

heeeeere's Baracholi
 
1 Attachment(s)
yep.. a good one
Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
The avatar is great because it upsets people. Mission Accomplished.

Who had the barackolli obama avatar? That's one of my faves.


geeker2 09-13-2008 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
The avatar is great because it upsets people. Mission Accomplished.

Who had the barackolli obama avatar? That's one of my faves.


I always laugh at dalakhani avatar....it took balls to put Hillary up there :tro:

dalakhani 09-13-2008 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geeker2
I always laugh at dalakhani avatar....it took balls to put Hillary up there :tro:

LOL. :wf

geeker2 09-13-2008 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
LOL. :wf

:D :wf :tro:

GPK 09-13-2008 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geeker2
I always laugh at dalakhani avatar....it took balls to put Hillary up there :tro:


Well done my friend:$:

geeker2 09-13-2008 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
Well done my friend:$:

:D

On a more important note I fired an 84 at the San Luis Rey Downs Golf Course (128 slope) yesterday doubled the last hole. Net score 64. :)

GPK 09-13-2008 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geeker2
:D

On a more important note I fired an 84 at the San Luis Rey Downs Golf Course (128 slope) yesterday doubled the last hole. Net score 64. :)


Sandbagger....I played with your type before. NO SHAME:wf

ArlJim78 09-13-2008 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
The least she could do is answer to the party line. She couldnt even do that. She wants to go after terrorists in Pakistan while McCain says NO.

Sorry...no spin today.

in case you somehow missed it, the theme of the ticket is that they're mavericks, they make independent decisions and challenge the party line when appropriate.

speaking about no spin, she did not say she wants to go after terrorists in Pakistan.

dalakhani 09-13-2008 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
in case you somehow missed it, the theme of the ticket is that they're mavericks, they make independent decisions and challenge the party line when appropriate.

speaking about no spin, she did not say she wants to go after terrorists in Pakistan.

I think we need to ad "deaf" to dumb and blind in your case.

"charlie" asked "cuda" if she would go into pakistan to chase after terrorists. She said she would. McCain said that we cant.

Do you want the quotes or the video?

i hear you with the maverick thing...but foreign policy is important. Its one thing to go against party line (although McCain has voted with Bush 90% of the time...and those are McCAINS own words) but this would be a new one if two people on THE SAME TICKET cant agree on foreign policy as pertains to national security.

Then again, its hard to even have an idea of what foreign policy is when you have only been overseas ONCE in your entire life like Mrs. Palin. Maybe on her next trip visiting Track (stupid ****ing name) she can listen to a book on the Bush Doctrine. Maybe someone can even give her one of those world maps where you can color in the countries.

Danzig 09-13-2008 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
I think we need to ad "deaf" to dumb and blind in your case.

"charlie" asked "cuda" if she would go into pakistan to chase after terrorists. She said she would. McCain said that we cant.

Do you want the quotes or the video?

i hear you with the maverick thing...but foreign policy is important. Its one thing to go against party line (although McCain has voted with Bush 90% of the time...and those are McCAINS own words) but this would be a new one if two people on THE SAME TICKET cant agree on foreign policy as pertains to national security.

Then again, its hard to even have an idea of what foreign policy is when you have only been overseas ONCE in your entire life like Mrs. Palin. Maybe on her next trip visiting Track (stupid ****ing name) she can listen to a book on the Bush Doctrine. Maybe someone can even give her one of those world maps where you can color in the countries.

the washington post says don't blame palin for any confusion, they count seven bush doctrines. i wonder if bush can even describe the bush doctrine?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...ail/components

ArlJim78 09-13-2008 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
I think we need to ad "deaf" to dumb and blind in your case.

"charlie" asked "cuda" if she would go into pakistan to chase after terrorists. She said she would. McCain said that we cant.

Do you want the quotes or the video?

there is no quote from Palin saying she would go into Pakistan chasing terrorists. she had the sense to not be pinned down and define what action the US should or should not take. i think she said all options should be on the table.

on the contrary, it was none other than commander Obama himself who made the irresponsible statement last year the US should invade Pakistan.

ateamstupid 09-13-2008 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
there is no quote from Palin saying she would go into Pakistan chasing terrorists. she had the sense to not be pinned down and define what action the US should or should not take. i think she said all options should be on the table.

on the contrary, it was none other than commander Obama himself who made the irresponsible statement last year the US should invade Pakistan.

Yeah, except that's not what he said.

And we should be concentrating on Pakistan, instead of this ridiculous crusade against nobody in Iraq.

Coach Pants 09-13-2008 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
Yeah, except that's not what he said.

And we should be concentrating on Pakistan, instead of this ridiculous crusade against nobody in Iraq.

So you have no problems with the possibility of mass casualties in Pakistan? You do realize they have nukes?

ArlJim78 09-13-2008 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
Yeah, except that's not what he said.

And we should be concentrating on Pakistan, instead of this ridiculous crusade against nobody in Iraq.

here is the quote.

"When I am president, we will wage the war that has to be won," he told an audience at the Woodrow Wilson Center in the District. He added, "The first step must be to get off the wrong battlefield in Iraq and take the fight to the terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan."

pretty clear to me.

dalakhani 09-13-2008 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
here is the quote.

"When I am president, we will wage the war that has to be won," he told an audience at the Woodrow Wilson Center in the District. He added, "The first step must be to get off the wrong battlefield in Iraq and take the fight to the terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan."

pretty clear to me.

you are an idiot. He meant that the terrorist are BASED in pakistan and afganistan and other quotes support that.

Danzig 09-13-2008 05:18 PM

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3434573&page=1

Rileyoriley 09-13-2008 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig


Why bother Deb? You're just going to be told how "wrong" you are.:rolleyes:


On a side note, is that your son's ship?

dalakhani 09-13-2008 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rileyoriley
Why bother Deb? You're just going to be told how "wrong" you are.:rolleyes:


On a side note, is that your son's ship?

How can anyone be "wrong" when there is no opinion stated? All there is a link that shows that Obama would chase terrorists into Pakistan.

:rolleyes:

Rileyoriley 09-13-2008 05:40 PM

Of course, you are correct Michelle Obama.:rolleyes:

ateamstupid 09-13-2008 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
So you have no problems with the possibility of mass casualties in Pakistan? You do realize they have nukes?

My point was that he never said we should 'invade' Pakistan, and that acting on al-Qaeda in Pakistan, militarily or otherwise, is what should've been done to begin with instead of this historically embarrassing, horrendous, catastrophic debacle in Iraq.

dalakhani 09-13-2008 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rileyoriley
Of course, you are correct Michelle Obama.:rolleyes:

Whatever you say Lassie.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.