![]() |
Day that Shall Live in Infamy
Please take a moment of your day to remember our fallen hero's who gave their lives for our freedom 66 years ago today. December 7th, 1941 is one of the defining moments of world history and the men and women who fought and perished at Pearl Harbor will never be forgotten.
http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/e...r/pearlhbr.htm |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Couldn't agree more. The history is amazing and it is definitely a place that everyone needs to visit and see. My wife and I were taken back by it and I will definitely never forget what happened there and what I saw. Besides after you go there head out to the north shore of oahu... |
The sad part is that this is the first place that I have seen any mention of it. Nothing on TV, radio or in the newspapers. But there is plenty of coverage of the Grammy nominations that came out yesterday. This country is so F'd up sometimes!
|
Quote:
|
God Bless the fallen heroes and the few still living.
I sat in Barnes and Noble on Sunday morning, picked up this book and read it for a couple hours. If you are a history buff and love this kind of stuff, I highly recommend it. I put it on my Christmas list. http://search.barnesandnoble.com/boo...07262837&itm=1 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.sptimes.com/2007/12/07/ti...t/Times_1A.pdf |
My wife's father flew 20+ missions in the Pacific as a ball turret gunner. He was the guy who sat in a steel cage attached to the bottom of the plane and fired a machine gun. For added protection, he made his own "body armor" using tin cans and a rivet gun.
We went with him in 2005 to a WW2 Veterans event. Amazing to meet these people and hear their stories. God bless them all. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
One thing that they spoke of, was that the nurses could do nothing to help all the fallen due to the mass numbers so they ran about administering morphine to every fallen person labeling them with an M in lipstick so as not to overmedicate. |
Even though the majority are probably gone by now, I would still like to say thank you for all you did....and this is the only place so far today I have heard this. Thank you for starting this thread...
|
It was mentioned on the radio station I listen to, and if ever there was a station more likely to be obsessed with the Grammys, it would be this one(Z100). But they brought it up. One of the DJs on the show is in his 70s and talked about sitting next to the radio with his parents, listening to FDR's famous speech.
In fact, here's a link to the "a date which will live in infamy" speech, including an audio link so you can hear it (plus some other audio links from that event): http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5166/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
How many of those people who died, do you think, were directly, or even indirectly, involved in the attacks on a US military base in 1941? Those people we burned to death were civilians. Here's a description of what many of them looked like: <<They had no hair because their hair was burned, and at a glance you couldn't tell whether you were looking at them from the front or in back.... If there had been only one or two such people ... perhaps I would not have had such a strong impression. But wherever I walked I met these people.... Many of them died along the road.... They didn't look like people of this world.>> And: <<The river became not a stream of flowing water but rather a stream of drifting dead bodies. No matter how much I might exaggerate the stories of the burned people who died shrieking and of how the city of Hiroshima was burned to the ground, the facts would still be clearly more terrible.>> I'm not defending Japan in WW2, God knows. In fact, I even understand why Truman made the decision to drop the bombs. But to say the Japanese didn't pay what was due? Jesus Christ. How bloodthirsty can a person get? Here's a good link to Truman's decision to drop the bomb and the aftermath: http://www.isreview.org/issues/13/Hi...Nagasaki.shtml Sorry Scuds- I don't mean to sound harsh, but come on, really? |
My Grandma visited the memorial in the early 70's, the oil from the USS Arizona still rises to the surface even today.
|
for those that get it, military channel is running some shows now but 6pm they start their evening coverage. history channel also doing some shows tonight.
i have 1 uncle that was an army air corp engineer on a PBY subhunter in the atlantic. another that was in an artillery crew, that went from normandy to the outskirts of berlin. they have not told any stories until recently. Tidefans.com has a thread today under the football section, even has some guys in iraq now posting in the thread. THANK YOU! to our servicemen and women past and present! |
Quote:
|
Question:
I was told by a high school history teacher that on Dec 6, 1941, the entire US Pacific fleet was assembled in one place for only the first and ever time. Coincidentally, negotiations with Japanese diplomats in Washington DC had "broken down". The carriers left port (Pearl Harbor) that day, and the following morning, we know what happened, though warnings from spotters we ignored. So...Did FDR set it up to get the USA into WWII? Like, "here's your shot, Japan, have at it." ps: My father was an officer that served in the South Pacific as an engineer (building landing fields). Two purple hearts, malaria, jungle rot, and nightmares for many many years after. He was one of the greatest generation. I miss him every day. He also shared this question, and said the only thing that spared the US from defeat in the Pacific was the Panama Canal. |
Ok...you want to hear something that is really hard for me to believe? On another forum I go to, I opened a thread asking for a moment of thoughtful reflection for those at Pearl Harbor that day. A little girl, aged 10 she claims, replies to my thread..."Happy Pearl Harbor Day".
Do the schools not teach that it is not a holiday that we wish to be remembered as "happy"? I live in OK now, and wondered if I opened a thread to remember the Trail of Tears, would another child wish me happy trail of tears day without realizing it is a solemn topic? It is sad that children today [most of them] do not realize the history behind the holidays and events in their lives. Maybe the schools need to get back to basics..... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
i have a tremendously hard time believing that fdr would sacrifice so much to get us into the war, a war which many already wanted us in. also, keep in mind that we were no superpower. yes, we had some ships lost, but the fleet then in no way compares to now. actually most ships were salvaged and put back into action fairly quickly; the attack wasn't quite as devestating as initially thought. of course the loss of life was significant. and we hadn't had an attack on our own soil since the civil war. but for anyone to suggest that the commander in chief, for whatever reason, would sacrifice his own troops to get us in battle is ludicrous in the least. |
Quote:
And where's your proof that every single person burned to death by those bombs supported the war? Did the babies? Did the four-year-olds? How about the five-year-olds? To say we killed absolutely no innocents is not only ridiculous, it smacks of the same irrational nationalism that you accuse other nations of. Are you saying those babies and small children deserved to burn up in an atomic blast? Is that what you're saying? Yes or no, please. We fought back after being attacked and we fought Japan until they surrendered. Once they did, we stopped attacking and helped them rebuild. Because that's what you do in war, if you're fighting it honorably. Anything else is just revenge. Continuing to punish a nation after it surrenders is the behavior of thugs. Thank goodness the leaders of our nation during WWII didn't think like you- today Japan is an ally, due in no small part to us helping it rebuild. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
i was told by someone who thought college kids too challanging "the entire US Pacific fleet was assembled in one place for only the first and ever time." leaving the west coast undefended. "Coincidentally, negotiations with Japanese diplomats in Washington DC had "broken down"." which is why we wouldn't want any ships on the west coast. "The carriers left port (Pearl Harbor) that day" after someone finally figured out san diego was vulnerable to the mexican coast guard. "ps: My father was an officer that served in the South Pacific as an engineer (building landing fields). Two purple hearts, malaria, jungle rot, and nightmares for many many years after." i'm throwing his corpse in the pot in case anyone challanges this delusion. go ahead. i dare you. |
Quote:
once we've destroyed turkey and japan will you finally calm down? |
I leave for Hawaii in 7 days for the Rainbow Basketball Classic...Pearl Harbor is my 1st stop to visit when I get some time off! I've always wanted to make the visit to the Arizona.
|
Quote:
In no way do I wish to discuss the US entering WWI. Let's stay with WWII. Many have questioned the circumstances of Dec 7, 1941. Of interest to me is that the carriers and their escorts (swift ships) left port and left-over junk from WWI remained at anchor in Pearl Harbor. It is also interesting that in the Phillipines, McArthur kept his planes grounded where they were subsequently destroyed by Japanese bombers. FDR faced opposition to US involvement in the war in Europe. As Germany and Japan were allies (Axis), the attack by Japan created public outrage, and the declaration of war provided the entry to US participation in Europe. In my opinion, there is absolutely nothing "ludicrous" in questioning the decisions of American leaders. In fact, doing so is called "free speech". DTS |
i read your reply dts, and feel no need to bang my head against this wall. have at it.
|
Quote:
One of my friends here at Derby Trail provided me with this link: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/pe...315/pearl.html I'm not asking you to "bang your head against this wall", however, in my humble view, it is much better to be informed than to remain in ignorance. DTS |
http://www.slate.com/id/94663
having an opposing view in no way indicates ignorance, dts. i am very well read on ww 2, as well as the rest of american history. i have to say that when i read the line in the article above regarding oswald, i thought of you. i also find it interesting (and this is the wall and my head part i was talking about) is that you are so set on our govt, by and for our people, being so evil and corrupt. no doubt your bias influences what articles you believe, or don't. i tend to make up my mind on a case by case basis, without allowing any preconceived notions to influence what i think about any certain matters. |
Quote:
In no way did I intend to insult you as being ignorant for having an opposing view. If you took it that way, my apology. If you believe that the government we currently have is "by the people and for the people", then we remain in total disagreement. Our current regime is indeed corrupt and quite evil. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
OOOOOOOOOO |
Quote:
who said i didn't enjoy this? "All you ever do is return somebody's fast serve" or slow fat curveball "but you can't serve" i know. it's too difficult to throw those heavy blood soaked opinions around. "Your opinion is don't have a strong opinion" that's called "open minded" the rest of that post is more of your usual yadda yadda yadda only less funny. |
Quote:
I can understand your anger but it's your militancy that i find a bit scary. Do you have any idea of what the estimates were like, the total numbers of victims? Can you comprehend the number 200,000? TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND children, women, men, daughters, sons, parents, loved ones? Do you understand that that number doesn't include the misery of those who died later, who suffered from radiation burns, cancer, etc? That that number is merely an estimate (which goes as high as 210,000)? http://www.tamilnation.org/images/hu...hiroshima1.gif http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/RM1.US.HIROSHIMA2.JPG I'm not saying you're a bad person here... just reminding you that innocent people on both sides suffered horrific and unimaginable deaths. I'm curious as to your comment on the population of Turkey and also want to know if you address women in general as "lady" or if that was some kind of term of endearment for GR. It seems a little demeaning to me... like some bad dialogue from a 50's film. She's literate, educated and states her points well. I just find the term a bit crude. |
Shut your mouth and go into the kitchen and make me a sammich, woman. :eek:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.