Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   9/30: JCGC; Vos; Beldame; JHTC (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17040)

GPK 09-27-2007 02:30 PM

Joe Hirsch Turf Classic
 
Why the move to Sunday this year? Hasn't it been on Saturday's in the past? Or maybe my memory is sh*t..

Sightseek 09-27-2007 02:32 PM

They heard your head would explode seeing Eng Chan and Typhoon on the same day.

I'm not crazy about the bigger races being moved to Sunday.

GPK 09-27-2007 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
Why the move to Sunday this year? Hasn't it been on Saturday's in the past? Or maybe my memory is sh*t..


Im not losing it...it was on a Saturday last year...

Linny 09-27-2007 02:33 PM

TV coverage.

GPK 09-27-2007 02:34 PM

This sucks....the first NFL game I have ever been to in my life is this coming Sunday.

F me running...:(

viscount26 09-27-2007 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
This sucks....the first NFL game I have ever been to in my life is this coming Sunday.

F me running...:(

Jeez Kev. I've been to more games than you
:D

SentToStud 09-27-2007 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
This sucks....the first NFL game I have ever been to in my life is this coming Sunday.

F me running...:(

The Smith Mtn Lake Trout?

Linny 09-27-2007 02:45 PM

The field for this "Classic" really sucks. EC is not as good as he once was and out of 14 invitees, only 2 entered. They re-opened the race and got little of note.

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2007 02:53 PM

I agree.....as of now ( and can't see things changing ) it looks like a horrifically bad race. Plus, there appears to be no pace whatsoever. English Channel isn't much but his competition, save Shamidan who looks like a victim of pace, may well be even worse.

Sightseek 09-27-2007 02:54 PM

It really stinks that the untelivised races will probably have much better and fuller fields than the Sunday line-up. Both the Beldame & JCGC are looking short too, no?

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2007 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek
It really stinks that the untelivised races will probably have much better and fuller fields than the Sunday line-up. Both the Beldame & JCGC are looking short too, no?


At least the Beldame is a good betting race with Ginger Punch the likely favorite. She's pretty hopeless in there.

All the dodging of big races, with an eye on the evil BC, has ruined high end racing. But that's old news.

Sightseek 09-27-2007 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
At least the Beldame is a good betting race with Ginger Punch the likely favorite. She's pretty hopeless in there.

All the dodging of big races, with an eye on the evil BC, has ruined high end racing. But that's old news.

King Glorious would like to know how you can say this without the PP's.

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2007 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek
King Glorious would like to know how you can say this without the PP's.


That's good.

SentToStud 09-27-2007 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
At least the Beldame is a good betting race with Ginger Punch the likely favorite. She's pretty hopeless in there.

All the dodging of big races, with an eye on the evil BC, has ruined high end racing. But that's old news.

Has it ever. I remember when the summer was for older horses to run in handicaps to see who could carry weight and even run on turf and the fall series brought the 3 yos together with the olders to see who was best at any age. When I think about what's happened to the fall Belmont meet it truly saddens me.

boswd 09-27-2007 03:10 PM

yeah Super Saturday is now Super Sunday to yeah compete agains the NFL. Super smart.

I wonder if the Win and your in had to do with it,

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2007 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SentToStud
Has it ever. I remember when the summer was for older horses to run in handicaps to see who could carry weight and even run on turf and the fall series brought the 3 yos together with the olders to see who was best at any age. When I think about what's happened to the fall Belmont meet it truly saddens me.


I couldn't agree more.

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2007 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boswd
yeah Super Saturday is now Super Sunday to yeah compete agains the NFL. Super smart.

I wonder if the Win and your in had to do with it,

ESPN shows College Football on Saturday. The only way those races could be televised was to move them to Sunday. I agree it's unfortunate but I guess it's better to have them televised nationally.

GPK 09-27-2007 03:21 PM

All the hating on EC.

Id love to own a horse that "isn't much" and has earned the $$ he has.

Hes not a Euro quality turf horse by anymeans...but his record here in America speaks for itself.

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2007 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
All the hating on EC.

Id love to own a horse that "isn't much" and has earned the $$ he has.

Hes not a Euro quality turf horse by anymeans...but his record here in America speaks for itself.

It's not " hating "....it's reality. His last race was decidely mediocre and none of his efforts this year have been particularly good. For him to be odds-on, given his 2007 form, in a supposed big race like this is a complete condemnation of the race.

You're a fan of his, that's great, and obviously we all wished we owned him, but the truth speaks for itself.

The Indomitable DrugS 09-27-2007 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
Id love to own a horse that "isn't much" and has earned the $$ he has.

My man, you just went with my all-time least favorite defense for a horse, the 'I'd love to own one like him' card.

I think I've had that one thrown at me everytime I've gone on one of my crusades against wildly overrated horses.

brianwspencer 09-27-2007 03:32 PM

He's just not what he used to be.

And what he used to be was good enough to score wins against competition that was more often than not less than stellar for the class level.

He's a fine racehorse and has certainly given good accounts of himself for most of his career, but I'm hard pressed off the top of my head to think of a time when he ran into a top-level racehorse without wilting.

Danzig 09-27-2007 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
My man, you just went with my all-time least favorite defense for a horse, the 'I'd love to own one like him' card.

I think I've had that one thrown at me everytime I've gone on one of my crusades against wildly overrated horses.

always the go-to when anyone mentioned perfect drift in anything other than a favorable way.

GPK 09-27-2007 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
It's not " hating "....it's reality. His last race was decidely mediocre and none of his efforts this year have been particularly good. For him to be odds-on, given his 2007 form, in a supposed big race like this is a complete condemnation of the race.

You're a fan of his, that's great, and obviously we all wished we owned him, but the truth speaks for itself.


That last race is a complete tossout. How do you all of a sudden try to rate a horse 9-10 lengths off the lead, in a Grade 1 race, when his success from stalking just off the pacesitter speaks for itself. I still disagree with the posted fractions of that race as well. No way, IMO, they went that fast for the first 6 panels.

brianwspencer 09-27-2007 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
always the go-to when anyone mentioned perfect drift in anything other than a favorable way.

also known as getting gritsed.

GPK 09-27-2007 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
My man, you just went with my all-time least favorite defense for a horse, the 'I'd love to own one like him' card.

I think I've had that one thrown at me everytime I've gone on one of my crusades against wildly overrated horses.


Im reaching Drugs, I know...throw me a bone here, will ya?

King Glorious 09-27-2007 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek
King Glorious would like to know how you can say this without the PP's.

That made me laugh. It's only ridiculous if I form a definitive opinion before the draw but it's ok if the Master does it.

Scav 09-27-2007 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
Im reaching Drugs, I know...throw me a bone here, will ya?

You have been REACHING since this horse was 2

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2007 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
That made me laugh. It's only ridiculous if I form a definitive opinion before the draw but it's ok if the Master does it.


At least you understand who's opinions are more qualified around here. That's a start.

GPK 09-27-2007 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
At least you understand who's opinions are more qualified around here. That's a start.


I laughed

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2007 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
That last race is a complete tossout. How do you all of a sudden try to rate a horse 9-10 lengths off the lead, in a Grade 1 race, when his success from stalking just off the pacesitter speaks for itself. I still disagree with the posted fractions of that race as well. No way, IMO, they went that fast for the first 6 panels.


Huh? He got a perfect trip and got swallowed up.

What are you saying....unless he gets the most perfect trips possible he's barely competitive?

GPK 09-27-2007 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav
You have been REACHING since this horse was 2


Come back when you know sh*t about horse racing....

GPK 09-27-2007 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Huh? He got a perfect trip and got swallowed up.

What are you saying....unless he gets the most perfect trips possible he's barely competitive?


Taking a horse out of his preferred, and highly succesful, running style qualifies as a perfect trip?

King Glorious 09-27-2007 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
At least you understand who's opinions are more qualified around here. That's a start.

I've always known that it was your world and we are just trying to live in it. But don't u at least find it a bit hypocritical on your part to pick at me for doing it and then u come right back and do the same thing?

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2007 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
I've always known that it was your world and we are just trying to live in it. But don't u at least find it a bit hypocritical on your part to pick at me for doing it and then u come right back and do the same thing?


Only if you take it out of context.

You acted as though you handicapped the race and couldn't make a case for a mid-priced horse. I am suggesting that I am looking forward to betting against an odds-on favorite who has dressed up form. Two very different scenerios.

The Indomitable DrugS 09-27-2007 03:44 PM

I think English Channel's last race will look much better on sheet-figures than it will look any other way.

He gave the winner six pounds at 12 furlongs - which I believe is like 2.9 lengths in weight on the sheets. And the winner, got a great ground saving ride from Calvin Borel, while EC was a little bit wide as I recall.

I'm positive EC came away with the better figure - even though he was beaten by 3 lengths...which is a large margin of victory in a turf race.

I don't think EC is as good as he once was either - but he was beat by a dream-trip winner as I remember, and weight shifts like that can mean a little something in turf marathons. Look at how 3yo's tend to dominate olders in the Arc.

Even if you excuse the loss in the Sword Dancer - his win in the UN came with a dream trip, and his Manhatten effort was blah.

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2007 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
Taking a horse out of his preferred, and highly succesful, running style qualifies as a perfect trip?

Stalking slow paces is hardly a better trip than being slightly farther back against impossibly fast paces. All the pace did in the Sword Dancer was give the deeper closers a fairer chance than they usually have against English Channel. It didn't hurt him....it just helped another. He still ran his usual mediocre race.

King Glorious 09-27-2007 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Only if you take it out of context.

You acted as though you handicapped the race and couldn't make a case for a mid-priced horse. I am suggesting that I am looking forward to betting against an odds-on favorite who has dressed up form. Two very different scenerios.

How did I act as if anything? The odds of the horses in the races played no factor in what I said. And u trying to make it seem like u were talking only about betting against her is very weak. U were very clear in your analysis, saying she was hopeless here. The scenarios are the same. U know Ginger Punch and u know what's likely to be in the race against her and u don't like her chances. Same with me and Fabulous Strike in the Vosburgh.

GPK 09-27-2007 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Stalking slow paces is hardly a better trip than being slightly farther back against impossibly fast paces. All the pace did in the Sword Dancer was give the deeper closers a fairer chance than they usually have against English Channel. It didn't hurt him....it just helped another. He still ran his usual mediocre race.


again...I have a hard time believing the posted fractions in the Sword Dancer are correct.

pdrift1 09-27-2007 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
All the hating on EC.

Id love to own a horse that "isn't much" and has earned the $$ he has.

Hes not a Euro quality turf horse by anymeans...but his record here in America speaks for itself.

hey its not hating . just like you told me with drift-it is what is. just not the same horse he was a year or 2 ago.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.