Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Lukas living in the past? I dream of Cat Thief, and Spain (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13251)

MisterB 05-17-2007 06:59 AM

Lukas living in the past? I dream of Cat Thief, and Spain
 
It sure seems fitting for D. Wayne to come in here with the old days on his mind. I ripped tickets the days he stuck it to me back then. The Cat showed up with a $41.00 win, then he busted my balls with Spains $113.00 winning effort. I am sure he must still have that pic hanging on his wall some place.

Now he comes to the plate with a fast horse, that falls apart after 7 panels. Being a flame thrower, he must be pulling the trigger like Jones did back in the Derby. Does he really think he can cash here? I guess so. What is Guidry's orders this fine Saturday? Seems pretty easy to me, gun the basterd, and see how far he can run Mark. Sure looks like he will be standing in line for some crab cakes after it's all over, but I ripped both time before.

O hell, good luck Old man, I'll have 2 bucks on your horse anyway, I need a souvenir.

timmgirvan 05-17-2007 07:07 AM

I remember when Lukas shipped Pancho Villa to NY for a Stakes race....went of at 29-1 and smoked 'em:D

Cajungator26 05-17-2007 08:28 AM

As stupid as this is, I'm putting $2 across on him because he's coming out of the 6 hole and because there's a line in Fergie's song, Glamorous, about 'flying first class.' :o

Just a strange vibe.

Coach Pants 05-17-2007 08:33 AM

This thread is grizzled.

I'll have no part of losing nostalgia. This "horse" has no shot.

Cajungator26 05-17-2007 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
This thread is grizzled.

I'll have no part of losing nostalgia. This "horse" has no shot.

I don't think so either, but I'll be damned if I don't have something on him just in case Lukas pulls a 'fast one.'

Coach Pants 05-17-2007 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
I don't think so either, but I'll be damned if I don't have something on him just in case Lukas pulls a 'fast one.'

I think 3 40's of O.E. would be a better $6 investment. :D

Cajungator26 05-17-2007 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
I think 3 40's of O.E. would be a better $6 investment. :D

You're probably right! :D

blackthroatedwind 05-17-2007 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
I remember when Lukas shipped Pancho Villa to NY for a Stakes race....went of at 29-1 and smoked 'em:D


He paid around $35....not $60.

blackthroatedwind 05-17-2007 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
As stupid as this is, I'm putting $2 across on him because he's coming out of the 6 hole and because there's a line in Fergie's song, Glamorous, about 'flying first class.' :o

Just a strange vibe.


I am sorry I saw this.

Shouldn't there be a special room for this kind of stuff?

Cajungator26 05-17-2007 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
I am sorry I saw this.

Shouldn't there be a special room for this kind of stuff?

Well, tell me there's another reason this horse might hit the board? I surely don't see it.

blackthroatedwind 05-17-2007 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
Well, tell me there's another reason this horse might hit the board? I surely don't see it.

Fairy dust?

King Glorious 05-17-2007 09:59 AM

I know about Going Wild. I know about some other seeming longshots that Lukas has brought to these races. I also know about Charismatic, Commendable, Thunder Gulch, Spain, and Cat Thief. If anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt in this kind of situation, it's him. Plus, I do believe that the horse has some actual talent. Strange as it seems, I think he wins the Arkansas Derby if Curlin wasn't in there. I think that if Curlin wasn't there and the rider didn't have to make his move when he did to keep up with Curlin, he could have waited just a bit longer and the result could have been a lot different. I don't expect FFC to win the Preakness but it wouldn't be a total shock to me either. I give him about a 50% chance to hit the tri.

blackthroatedwind 05-17-2007 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
I give him about a 50% chance to hit the tri.


Because I like you, I will give you 6:5.

The usual internet $40K I assume?

philcski 05-17-2007 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
I know about Going Wild. I know about some other seeming longshots that Lukas has brought to these races. I also know about Charismatic, Commendable, Thunder Gulch, Spain, and Cat Thief. If anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt in this kind of situation, it's him. Plus, I do believe that the horse has some actual talent. Strange as it seems, I think he wins the Arkansas Derby if Curlin wasn't in there. I think that if Curlin wasn't there and the rider didn't have to make his move when he did to keep up with Curlin, he could have waited just a bit longer and the result could have been a lot different. I don't expect FFC to win the Preakness but it wouldn't be a total shock to me either. I give him about a 50% chance to hit the tri.

Thunder Gulch? All he won prior to the Derby was the Remsen, Fountain of Youth, Florida Derby, and was 2nd in the Hollywood Futurity and Cowdin.

FFC is no Thunder Gulch.

King Glorious 05-17-2007 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Because I like you, I will give you 6:5.

The usual internet $40K I assume?

Let's make it a cool million. Why play for chump change? I have it as:

1. Curlin
2. Circular Quay
3. Hard Spun
4. Street Sense
5. Flying First Class

ArlJim78 05-17-2007 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
I know about Going Wild. I know about some other seeming longshots that Lukas has brought to these races. I also know about Charismatic, Commendable, Thunder Gulch, Spain, and Cat Thief. If anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt in this kind of situation, it's him. Plus, I do believe that the horse has some actual talent. Strange as it seems, I think he wins the Arkansas Derby if Curlin wasn't in there. I think that if Curlin wasn't there and the rider didn't have to make his move when he did to keep up with Curlin, he could have waited just a bit longer and the result could have been a lot different. I don't expect FFC to win the Preakness but it wouldn't be a total shock to me either. I give him about a 50% chance to hit the tri.

Yes it is strange to think that with Curlin not in the Ark Derby, that FCC would have beaten the 4 other horses that finished in front of him that day.

chances of him being in the tri? 25:1 if you ask me.
I think he has no shot to win, I think he is a sprinter and will not get this distance.

slotdirt 05-17-2007 10:21 AM

I think it's kind of funny that King Glorious says in one post that Flying First Class has a 50 percent shot of getting in the tri, then in the next post ranks him fifth among the Preakness contenders. I'm no mathmetician, but I don't think that adds up very well.

Pedigree Ann 05-17-2007 10:21 AM

Remember the reason I thought Stormello wouldn't last a classic distance? Mainly because of his female family, that has been geared toward producing hot 2yos and sprinter/milers? Well, Flying First Class is from the same family, the Solidity bunch from Old English Rancho. His sire, Perfect Mandate, is from the same sort of family and has been siring that sort of horse. A one-turn mile like the Derby Trial is exactly the sort of race that FFC that would be best suited by.

Chelokee also has something to prove on pedigree; his sire has had many a good horse who couldn't run past 8.5f (Chilukki, Kafwain) without looking for a taxi, and Silver Ghost isn't exactly a fount of stamina, either. Only the dam's dam's side can give you hope, and mum was best as a turf miler.

King Glorious 05-17-2007 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
Yes it is strange to think that with Curlin not in the Ark Derby, that FCC would have beaten the 4 other horses that finished in front of him that day.

chances of him being in the tri? 25:1 if you ask me.
I think he has no shot to win, I think he is a sprinter and will not get this distance.

Sort of like I think that Winning Colors would have won the Preakness if Forty Niner wasn't in there. Sometimes, the presence of one horse can alter your strategy enough to where u totally compromise your chances to win the race. Perhaps a better example would be that Forty Niner could have maybe won the race if Winning Colors wasn't in there.

When I watched the Arkansas Derby, I got a sense that the rider of FFC was riding as if Curlin was the horse to beat. Curlin made his move and so FFC had to move in order to keep within striking distance. I felt the move was a little early for him and as a result, he flattened out in the lane and was passed by some horses and finished fourth. Maybe if Curlin was not in the race, the rider of FFC could have waited a bit longer before making his move and the result could have been different. I'm not saying that's the way it would have gone but that's the feeling I had watching the race.

The Indomitable DrugS 05-17-2007 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt
I think it's kind of funny that King Glorious says in one post that Flying First Class has a 50 percent shot of getting in the tri, then in the next post ranks him fifth among the Preakness contenders. I'm no mathmetician, but I don't think that adds up very well.

It doesn't.

ArlJim78 05-17-2007 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Sort of like I think that Winning Colors would have won the Preakness if Forty Niner wasn't in there. Sometimes, the presence of one horse can alter your strategy enough to where u totally compromise your chances to win the race. Perhaps a better example would be that Forty Niner could have maybe won the race if Winning Colors wasn't in there.

When I watched the Arkansas Derby, I got a sense that the rider of FFC was riding as if Curlin was the horse to beat. Curlin made his move and so FFC had to move in order to keep within striking distance. I felt the move was a little early for him and as a result, he flattened out in the lane and was passed by some horses and finished fourth. Maybe if Curlin was not in the race, the rider of FFC could have waited a bit longer before making his move and the result could have been different. I'm not saying that's the way it would have gone but that's the feeling I had watching the race.

Okay, but Curlin IS in this race, and Curlin was no match in the KY Derby for the top two. It was Storminmay and Deadly Dealer who finished 2nd and 3rd in the Ark Derby, ahead of FCC. Check out the derby charts to see what happened to Storm In May when he tried to go a distance that is not good for him.
FCC has got no solution to get him on the board in the Preakness. At the end of the race he will be hopelessly out of it.

King Glorious 05-17-2007 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt
I think it's kind of funny that King Glorious says in one post that Flying First Class has a 50 percent shot of getting in the tri, then in the next post ranks him fifth among the Preakness contenders. I'm no mathmetician, but I don't think that adds up very well.

How about this then. Let's see if this will help a little. In one scenario, I see it as:

1. Curlin
2. Circular Quay
3. Hard Spun
4. Street Sense
5. FFC

In another, I see it as:

1. Street Sense......he's as good as advertised
2. Hard Spun......puts away the cheap speed and hangs on for second
3. FFC.....charges up like in the Ark Derby but hangs again...still gets third
4. Curlin.......the Derby/Preakness combo was just too much in a short period
5. Circular Quay....closing sprinter that really doesn't want more than 9f

So let's see here. That's two scenarios. FFC is in the tri in one and not in the other. Give me a second to break out my calculator. Let's see now. One out of two. I'm not a math major either so I could be wrong here but 1/2 keeps coming out to 50%. I could do a few more scenarios and come up with more combinations. I come up with FFC in the top three in about half of them. Or maybe 40-45%. Would that be better for u?

King Glorious 05-17-2007 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
Okay, but Curlin IS in this race, and Curlin was no match in the KY Derby for the top two. It was Storminmay and Deadly Dealer who finished 2nd and 3rd in the Ark Derby, ahead of FCC. Check out the derby charts to see what happened to Storm In May when he tried to go a distance that is not good for him.
FCC has got no solution to get him on the board in the Preakness. At the end of the race he will be hopelessly out of it.

And if Curlin runs his race again here, I don't think FFC can beat him. But there is a chance he doesn't run his race. I feel very strongly that this is the wrong place to be running hm. I feel about him like I did about Lion Heart coming back in the Preakness. Not worth it. I do think he can win and he's my pick to win but long term, I don't think it's worth it.

The thing is that even though Storm in May and Deadly Dealer were ahead of him in Arkansas doesn't mean I think they are better horses. Many factors can play into why a race order of finish comes in the way that it does without it meaning that the order determines the actual rank of the horses. Again, I personally thought that FFC was the second best horse in the race in Arkansas. What Storm in May did in the Derby has nothing to do with the Preakness and FFC. At least not that I see.

ArlJim78 05-17-2007 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
And if Curlin runs his race again here, I don't think FFC can beat him. But there is a chance he doesn't run his race. I feel very strongly that this is the wrong place to be running hm. I feel about him like I did about Lion Heart coming back in the Preakness. Not worth it. I do think he can win and he's my pick to win but long term, I don't think it's worth it.

The thing is that even though Storm in May and Deadly Dealer were ahead of him in Arkansas doesn't mean I think they are better horses. Many factors can play into why a race order of finish comes in the way that it does without it meaning that the order determines the actual rank of the horses. Again, I personally thought that FFC was the second best horse in the race in Arkansas. What Storm in May did in the Derby has nothing to do with the Preakness and FFC. At least not that I see.

FCC has run two routes this year, both times he finished up the track against Curlin and relatively weak fields. In his two routes he has faced 18 horses and managed to beat a grand total of 4 horses. That you are able to run multiple scenarios and find him hitting the tri fifty percent of the time in this race is simply amazing to me. To me he is the most unlikely horse in the field to be in the tri.

MisterB 05-17-2007 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
FCC has run two routes this year, both times he finished up the track against Curlin and relatively weak fields. In his two routes he has faced 18 horses and managed to beat a grand total of 4 horses. That you are able to run multiple scenarios and find him hitting the tri fifty percent of the time in this race is simply amazing to me. To me he is the most unlikely horse in the field to be in the tri.

It seems 20-1 also thinks so
:)

ArlJim78 05-17-2007 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
And if Curlin runs his race again here, I don't think FFC can beat him. But there is a chance he doesn't run his race. I feel very strongly that this is the wrong place to be running hm. I feel about him like I did about Lion Heart coming back in the Preakness. Not worth it. I do think he can win and he's my pick to win but long term, I don't think it's worth it.

The thing is that even though Storm in May and Deadly Dealer were ahead of him in Arkansas doesn't mean I think they are better horses. Many factors can play into why a race order of finish comes in the way that it does without it meaning that the order determines the actual rank of the horses. Again, I personally thought that FFC was the second best horse in the race in Arkansas. What Storm in May did in the Derby has nothing to do with the Preakness and FFC. At least not that I see.

Really? I think it has a lot more to do with it than your references to Winning Colors and Lion Heart. What does that have to do with FCC or Curlin? FCC was beaten a ton by Curlin, TWICE, RECENTLY. Even an off effort or a bounce by Curlin wouldn't put FCC in spitting distance of Curlin at the end. And that leaves the not so small matter of the rest of the field for FCC to deal with.

MisterB 05-17-2007 11:42 AM

If the race stopped at 7-1/2, he may be a contender:)

ArlJim78 05-17-2007 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterB
If the race stopped at 7-1/2, he may be a contender:)

He is going to drop anchor as they go into the far turn and end up galloping past the wire last.

King Glorious 05-17-2007 11:59 AM

Admittedly, I'm a Lukas fan and believe in him so I'll give FFC more of a chance simply because of Lukas. But I honestly feel that I've seen enough improvement in his last two races to feel he's going in the right direction. The Rebel was horrible. I think that a horse going in the right direction, some other horses coming off of their toughest races ever (and doing so in only two weeks), and the master behind the controls.......could equal a much better effort than anyone is anticipating. The question is whether even on his best day, he could be as good as those others? I think that if Curlin, CQ, Hard Spun and SS all run their best, FFC is looking at fifth at best. But if any of them stumble a bit and regress, he could sneak into the picture.

The Indomitable DrugS 05-17-2007 12:03 PM

KG,

If you draw a line through the form of his two lifetime sprint races....you're basically looking at the form of a 200/1 shot.

Being that he's bred to sprint top and bottom....I think his pedigree also confirms him as a sprinter.

You have too much faith in Lukas I think---as, he just wants to dance every dance. This horse would be a lot better off if he'd have just been pointed to sprint races---and trained to be a sprinter.

King Glorious 05-17-2007 12:38 PM

If that were the case, Lukas could have entered him in the Derby. There's no bigger dance than that one.

I don't know anything about pedigree. It's meaningless stuff to me.

One thing that I know about Lukas is that he isn't afraid to take chances in races. He isn't afraid to sacrifice a race either if he thinks it will help him get his horse ready for the bigger test.

I understand that more than likely, I'm wrong and u guys are right. But none of his competitors look to me like Smarty Jones or Ghostzapper or Candy Ride so it wouldn't take much of a jump for FFC to get to their level. It's not like he's got to get to the 115 Beyer level to compete with them. And they have questions to answer too. We'll see on Saturday.

philcski 05-17-2007 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
If that were the case, Lukas could have entered him in the Derby. There's no bigger dance than that one.
I don't know anything about pedigree. It's meaningless stuff to me.

One thing that I know about Lukas is that he isn't afraid to take chances in races. He isn't afraid to sacrifice a race either if he thinks it will help him get his horse ready for the bigger test.

I understand that more than likely, I'm wrong and u guys are right. But none of his competitors look to me like Smarty Jones or Ghostzapper or Candy Ride so it wouldn't take much of a jump for FFC to get to their level. It's not like he's got to get to the 115 Beyer level to compete with them. And they have questions to answer too. We'll see on Saturday.

Didn't have the earnings, or Lukas probably would have.

ArlJim78 05-17-2007 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
If that were the case, Lukas could have entered him in the Derby. There's no bigger dance than that one.

I don't know anything about pedigree. It's meaningless stuff to me.

Like phil pointed out, it's a given that had FCC had enough earnings, Lukas would have run him in the derby.

About your pedigree comment, I am somewhat in the same boat as you. I do know a little about it and pay some attention to the breeding.
But my comments on FCC were not based on breeding, they were based solely on his running lines and pace and speed figures. From that I can see that he is not likely to be competitive at 1 3/16 against anyone, let alone GR1types.

cakes44 05-17-2007 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
...and the master behind the controls...

At one time, maybe. Now he is a below 10% winning trainer with outstanding stock that just throws piles of unfit and outclassed horses into major stakes hoping that everyone else falls apart and his horses run out of their minds on that day.

packerbacker7964 05-17-2007 02:18 PM

I bet you that Xchanger beats him head to head.

timmgirvan 05-17-2007 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
He paid around $35....not $60.

I didn't think you were that old...so it was 17-1?

slotdirt 05-17-2007 02:25 PM

I actually think Xchanger may be the best of the "new" shooters, plus it's not like Ramon is completely unfamiliar with the track. That is, if you can forgive the two absolutely miserable efforts at Oaklawn earlier this spring.

Cajungator26 05-17-2007 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt
I actually think Xchanger may be the best of the "new" shooters, plus it's not like Ramon is completely unfamiliar with the track. That is, if you can forgive the two absolutely miserable efforts at Oaklawn earlier this spring.

Agreed, Slot.

brockguy 05-17-2007 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
As stupid as this is, I'm putting $2 across on him because he's coming out of the 6 hole and because there's a line in Fergie's song, Glamorous, about 'flying first class.' :o

Just a strange vibe.

have to say, i think of this horse every time i hear Fergie's song (which is alot!) can't say i like him in this spot though..


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.