Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Charles Hatton Reading Room (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   CRIST: Sets the NY facts straight (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12010)

Kasept 04-15-2007 08:19 AM

CRIST: Sets the NY facts straight
 
The importance of Steve Crist's column in today's paper is too important to be restricted to DRF subscribers. Anyone who has formed any opinion on the NY situation based on the lies and misrepresentations of the slot money salivators try to gain the franchise needs to know the facts.. Here they are presented by someone who speaks independently and with authority and first hand comprehension of the situation.


New York bidders twist reality
By STEVEN CRIST


http://www.drf.com/news/article/84006.html

MisterB 04-15-2007 08:45 AM

The Saratoga Ratcino has many Blue hairs, not many young people around. they profit from the monthly retirement checks, or the dead husbands life insurance and life savings. I told my wife, if she ever goes to the ratcino when I die, I'll haunt her till she dies.

Not one person their is a horse player.

Sightseek 04-15-2007 09:00 AM

It really is too bad this article didn't end up in the Times Union where more people would be reading it.


Things are looking sad for the future of NY Racing. :(

fpsoxfan 04-15-2007 09:00 AM

Thanks for that post
 
These outside groups do not care about the racing fan. They are only interested in the almighty dollar. The bottom line is, other groups were not interested in bidding against NYRA until slots became involved. They want to talk about corruption..take a good look at Silver and Bruno. What is Bailey saying??? Is he drinking again?? Stick to riding horses Jerry. Your commentating sucks too. The dipshit tried to say Street Sense got his nose down at the wire yesterday. What was he looking at?? When do the race fans get to weigh in on this NYRA thing? I go to Saratoga 5-10 or more times a summer. NYRA has its quirks, but they've done a fine job.

Hickory Hill Hoff 04-15-2007 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterB
The Saratoga Ratcino has many Blue hairs, not many young people around. they profit from the monthly retirement checks, or the dead husbands life insurance and life savings. I told my wife, if she ever goes to the ratcino when I die, I'll haunt her till she dies.

Not one person their is a horse player.

We went to Finger Lakes right after the "ratcino" opened there. I got a buddy who just loves Turning Stone... after he lost the first race at the Lakes, he headed down to the VLT room...45 mins later he comes back upstairs and says he's broke. Well, I told there's 6 more races at the Lakes to go...should have saved your money for here than blowing it on those machines! :rolleyes:
It was a long day for him...:(

TheSpyder 04-15-2007 09:09 AM

Good read Steve,

It makes you wonder what the state of racing will be in 20 years. The slots are a short term money generating out that has nothing to do with racing.

As I write this I'm reminded (don't know why) of a promotion by a grocery store in Cleveland circa 1960's. When you shopped there you got a racing ticket and there was a show every week of 6 horse races, I'm sure it was taped and can't remember where it was from.

Anyway, depending how many you won there were prizes. It was a great way to get poeple looking at races and now that I think about it may have been the seed that make me sprout as a life lone capper.

Spyder

Grits 04-15-2007 09:10 AM

The Times Union may have been alright for Upstate, rather limits the reach I think.

The piece would serve better in the Wall Street Journal, the NYTimes, the NYPost, and every other major racing publication and newspaper in the country where racing has a stake.

Hickory Hill Hoff 04-15-2007 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fpsoxfan
These outside groups do not care about the racing fan. They are only interested in the almighty dollar. The bottom line is, other groups were not interested in bidding against NYRA until slots became involved. They want to talk about corruption..take a good look at Silver and Bruno. What is Bailey saying??? Is he drinking again?? Stick to riding horses Jerry. Your commentating sucks too. The dipshit tried to say Street Sense got his nose down at the wire yesterday. What was he looking at?? When do the race fans get to weigh in on this NYRA thing? I go to Saratoga 5-10 or more times a summer. NYRA has its quirks, but they've done a fine job.

I just love those "other" so-called horse racing lovers from "other" so-called sites that ALWAYS knock the racing that NYRA puts forth. Does anybody really think that these slot people really care about the thoroughbred aspect at the track? DON'T FIX WHATS NOT BROKE! NYRA has had problems...BUT they have been corrected! I'M a racing fan...as long as the product is good, I'll play...if not I'll look elsewhere. Can never figure out why people just love to stick money into a machine.

Sightseek 04-15-2007 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grits
The Times Union may have been alright for Upstate, rather limits the reach I think.

The piece would serve better in the Wall Street Journal, the NYTimes, the NYPost, and every other major racing publication and newspaper in the country where racing has a stake.

I just listed the paper that was next to me, but having it in all would be nice.

Hickory Hill Hoff 04-15-2007 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpyder
Good read Steve,

It makes you wonder what the state of racing will be in 20 years. The slots are a short term money generating out that has nothing to do with racing.

As I write this I'm reminded (don't know why) of a promotion by a grocery store in Cleveland circa 1960's. When you shopped there you got a racing ticket and there was a show every week of 6 horse races, I'm sure it was taped and can't remember where it was from.

Anyway, depending how many you won there were prizes. It was a great way to get poeple looking at races and now that I think about it may have been the seed that make me sprout as a life lone capper.

Spyder

Back in the 70's the Grand Union chain in the northeast ran a simliar promotion. The races were from Hialeah I believe, my Dad won $50 from the game and somewhere I still have the "play at home" game that they made from the show.

Grits 04-15-2007 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hickory Hill Hoff
I just love those "other" so-called horse racing lovers from "other" so-called sites that ALWAYS knock the racing that NYRA puts forth. Does anybody really think that these slot people really care about the thoroughbred aspect at the track? DON'T FIX WHATS NOT BROKE! NYRA has had problems...BUT they have been corrected! I'M a racing fan...as long as the product is good, I'll play...if not I'll look elsewhere. Can never figure out why people just love to stick money into a machine.

It doesn't take brains, therefore no thinking, to stick money into a machine. Just the ability to watch for 3 cherries, or 3 whatever across.

fpsoxfan 04-15-2007 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hickory Hill Hoff
Back in the 70's the Grand Union chain in the northeast ran a simliar promotion. The races were from Hialeah I believe, my Dad won $50 from the game and somewhere I still have the "play at home" game that they made from the show.

That's funny Hoffy...I remember that too. They used to play the races on a Saturday night. You could tell the races they used were old because you'd see these ladies in 60's style mini skirts.
I may play today. I'm not sure. I'm very frustrated with Keeneland. Tough to get a good read .

golfer 04-15-2007 09:26 AM

I vaguely remember that as well. In fact, that's was probably what led me to being the degenerate horse player I am today!!! Sonofableep:mad: Damn you Grand Union!!

fpsoxfan 04-15-2007 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfer
I vaguely remember that as well. In fact, that's was probably what led me to being the degenerate horse player I am today!!! Sonofableep:mad: Damn you Grand Union!!

lol

Holland Hacker 04-15-2007 09:32 AM

Steve, Andy & Other New York Residents.

Does it make sense for you to write you legislators? I think it might help them make a better informed decision if they receive correspondence from the people who put them in Albany that also go to the track. I know everyone is busy but it doesn't have to be anything long. Perhaps even a short e-mail that points out some of the shortcomings or faults in some of the proposals as we see them.

I plan on sending an e-mail to some of the key legislators, including the Gov's office but I do not live in NY so it may fall on deaf ears. The only thing I can threaten is to stop going to the NY tracks and stop investing in NY Breds.

Even if someone could draft a form letter that people could send to their legislators and the govenor that could have an impact.

Just a thought.

Danzig 04-15-2007 09:41 AM

thanks for posting that steve. but there is still a possibility of nyra retaining control, correct?

i remember reading a few years ago about the whole slots deal....when the first few tracks got them, of course their bottom line got huge. but like that article said, once everyone gets them, the playing field is level again, and it still comes down to who does their job the best.

i don't understand why horse racing doesn't market itself like the casinos. it's as tho too many in racing don't want that side of it let out--but why?? people like to gamble, let them know how much more fun it is to make an educated guess, win some money, rather then sitting and mind-numbingly feeding a coin slot.
i went to a casino once, and i hated it. i have never touched the instant racing machines at oaklawn.

Hickory Hill Hoff 04-15-2007 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfer
I vaguely remember that as well. In fact, that's was probably what led me to being the degenerate horse player I am today!!! Sonofableep:mad: Damn you Grand Union!!

That chain is not around anymore...they went "belly up"!

golfer 04-15-2007 09:51 AM

I know it, Hickory, they were the local supermarket in my neighborhood until the late 90's, I guess. But they got what they deserved!!!:)

AeWingnut 04-15-2007 09:53 AM

Do slots add to the money for purses ? Which in turn gets better horses or more money for bad horses.

I agree slots don't add anything to racing and their ideas of promotion sound weak. I was listening to the Herd on ESPN and he was talking about how stuff like women's basketball was popular in the industry but it doesn't have an audience. Maybe we are just so into racing we can't see what everyone else sees. I am really into and can't see what the problem is.

I can imagine that it is because (we believe) it takes a certain amount of thought to have success at horseracing. as opposed to slots that takes no skill at all. When I ask people that play slots, what strategy they use I usually get "I knew it was going to hit" ???????

as for big lies.. two words

Global Warming

it may be fact but it's only a means to an end for the watermelons

blackthroatedwind 04-15-2007 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hickory Hill Hoff
Back in the 70's the Grand Union chain in the northeast ran a simliar promotion. The races were from Hialeah I believe, my Dad won $50 from the game and somewhere I still have the "play at home" game that they made from the show.


I remember those well and always watched. I believe they were from Tropical Park.

blackthroatedwind 04-15-2007 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
thanks for posting that steve. but there is still a possibility of nyra retaining control, correct?

i remember reading a few years ago about the whole slots deal....when the first few tracks got them, of course their bottom line got huge. but like that article said, once everyone gets them, the playing field is level again, and it still comes down to who does their job the best.

i don't understand why horse racing doesn't market itself like the casinos. it's as tho too many in racing don't want that side of it let out--but why?? people like to gamble, let them know how much more fun it is to make an educated guess, win some money, rather then sitting and mind-numbingly feeding a coin slot.
i went to a casino once, and i hated it. i have never touched the instant racing machines at oaklawn.


NYRA has more than a " chance " to remain in control of the franchise. They are a substantial favorite, in fact, to do so. However, I agree with everyone here that says this article should be in all the above mentioned papers, and it is my sincere hope that NYRA takes out full page ads, reprinting this article, in at least some of these publications.

There is, I think unfortunately, a gap between public perception about this franchise battle and its realities. In some ways I fault NYRA for this, though in other ways I can understand their thinking, as it seems obvious that they have chosen not to roll around in the dirt with the other bidders who are intentionally skewing the facts. What I would like to see them do is a better job of presenting their case to the public without getting into a battle with the other bidders.

Hickory Hill Hoff 04-15-2007 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
I remember those well and always watched. I believe they were from Tropical Park.

Your right, I knew it was in Florida somehere...the guy who hosted it did auto commericals in my area.
I can remember the "old ladies" in my town would have a "fit" if the cashier didn't give them their playing ticket! :rolleyes:

Hickory Hill Hoff 04-15-2007 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
NYRA has more than a " chance " to remain in control of the franchise. They are a substantial favorite, in fact, to do so. However, I agree with everyone here that says this article should be in all the above mentioned papers, and it is my sincere hope that NYRA takes out full page ads, reprinting this article, in at least some of these publications.

There is, I think unfortunately, a gap between public perception about this franchise battle and its realities. In some ways I fault NYRA for this, though in other ways I can understand their thinking, as it seems obvious that they have chosen not to roll around in the dirt with the other bidders who are intentionally skewing the facts. What I would like to see them do is a better job of presenting their case to the public without getting into a battle with the other bidders.

I totally agree, it seems they are their own worst emeny...a lot of people out there just believe everything they hear from the pols and NYRA bashers out there.

SniperSB23 04-15-2007 10:43 AM

I think if Steve or Andy or someone sent a well written piece into Tim Wilkin at the Times Union that it would likely make the paper. It may not have wide circulation but it does have wide circulation in Albany which is where these decisions are being made. The story would also be available on their website for mass circulation.

Linny 04-15-2007 10:50 AM

While I agree that the 3 other entities may be looking to grab VLT money, don't forget that NYRA has taken loan after loan, bailouts and even bankruptsy all while waiting for the VLT MONEY. No matter what happens, the VLT money will be heavily regulated and subject to NYS Lottery regulation.

I do agree that VLT's don't create racing fans, but I agree also with horsemen who claim the no effort is made to do so by "racino operators. Offering sumptuous facilities for slot players while racing fans watch from squalor, offering free admission to slotters while race fans are charged to death with admissions, expensive food and beverage and high cost information does nothing to promote racing. Geez, the NY horsemen are begging to have the in house signal piped into gaming rooms and VLT operations oppose the idea!

Sightseek 04-15-2007 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
NYRA has more than a " chance " to remain in control of the franchise. They are a substantial favorite, in fact, to do so. However, I agree with everyone here that says this article should be in all the above mentioned papers, and it is my sincere hope that NYRA takes out full page ads, reprinting this article, in at least some of these publications.

There is, I think unfortunately, a gap between public perception about this franchise battle and its realities. In some ways I fault NYRA for this, though in other ways I can understand their thinking, as it seems obvious that they have chosen not to roll around in the dirt with the other bidders who are intentionally skewing the facts. What I would like to see them do is a better job of presenting their case to the public without getting into a battle with the other bidders.

NPR did a somewhat lengthy segment on the bidders the other day during the drive home from work..of course it too, labeled the NYRA as the corrupt plaque franchise that has been controlling NY Racing for years. I think you may be correct in that they need to form a stronger explaination for their position, the media is focusing on the negative like the bankruptcy and using terms that do not flatter their name.

Hickory Hill Hoff 04-15-2007 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek
NPR did a somewhat lengthy segment on the bidders the other day during the drive home from work..of course it too, labeled the NYRA as the corrupt plaque franchise that has been controlling NY Racing for years. I think you may be correct in that they need to form a stronger explaination for their position, the media is focusing on the negative like the bankruptcy and using terms that do not flatter their name.

It doesn't surprise me that NPR would label NYRA that way, after all their "champions" for the "little" guy :rolleyes:
and not the wealthly, greedy "right wingers" in this country.

blackthroatedwind 04-15-2007 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny

I do agree that VLT's don't create racing fans, but I agree also with horsemen who claim the no effort is made to do so by "racino operators. Offering sumptuous facilities for slot players while racing fans watch from squalor, offering free admission to slotters while race fans are charged to death with admissions, expensive food and beverage and high cost information does nothing to promote racing. Geez, the NY horsemen are begging to have the in house signal piped into gaming rooms and VLT operations oppose the idea!

The goal of " racinos " is to not let their patrons even know there is racing going on, of this there is no doubt, and it is seemingly true everywhere but probably nowhere worse than NY State. I am not saying you said this, but be absolutely clear that this is in NO way NYRA's fault, and strictly the fault of the STATE and, specifically, the NY State Lottery. This is another example of State regulation acting in a manner contrary to both racing's best interests as well as NYRA's.

Some of the blame for situations like this lay in the hands of your employer, an OTB in the State of NY, that has a proven track record of working in opposition to both the racing fan in NY State and NYRA. It is OTB that forced the recent increase in takeout, as NYRA was forced to allow this in order to implement their rebate program, and this was the compromise they had to make with NY State legislature due to interference from the NY State OTBs. This is the same OTB structure that not only allowed the Pick-6 scandal to occur but also encouraged the payment of the participants. But, of course, it is NYRA that is " scandal plagued ".

Danzig 04-15-2007 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
NYRA has more than a " chance " to remain in control of the franchise. They are a substantial favorite, in fact, to do so. However, I agree with everyone here that says this article should be in all the above mentioned papers, and it is my sincere hope that NYRA takes out full page ads, reprinting this article, in at least some of these publications.

There is, I think unfortunately, a gap between public perception about this franchise battle and its realities. In some ways I fault NYRA for this, though in other ways I can understand their thinking, as it seems obvious that they have chosen not to roll around in the dirt with the other bidders who are intentionally skewing the facts. What I would like to see them do is a better job of presenting their case to the public without getting into a battle with the other bidders.

good to know.
they weren't the ones chosen by the panel set up by the previous gov, correct? so, with spitzer throwing it back into the process, did their chances improve by much?
is this a case of going with what you know, rather than what you don't? and wasn't the group that swindal was a part of, along with the steinbrenners, the one who got the nod first time out?

blackthroatedwind 04-15-2007 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
good to know.
they weren't the ones chosen by the panel set up by the previous gov, correct? so, with spitzer throwing it back into the process, did their chances improve by much?
is this a case of going with what you know, rather than what you don't? and wasn't the group that swindal was a part of, along with the steinbrenners, the one who got the nod first time out?

The panel makes recommendations....they don't choose the franchise holder. The first panel selected a group that has now pretty much dropped out of the bidding. Pretty sad to think their recommendation didn't even make the second go-round.

Payson Dave 04-15-2007 11:20 AM

It seems to me that the delay in getting the slots up and running at Aqu has been an intentional attempt to undermine NYRA....I think it is fair to explore which politians benefit from the undermining of NYRA and how do they benefit...ie some connection to Excelsior or Empire???

blackthroatedwind 04-15-2007 11:32 AM

I can't help but harken back to a recent appearance of mine on ATRAB, right after the first panel recommended Excelsior, where I was interupted ( frequently and at length ) by Excelsior shill Gary Contessa. He went on and on about how great it was going to be to have NY racing run by the Steinbrenner family and the New York Yankees.

Boy was Gary right! They were so committed to NY racing that they dropped out just a few months later. Wow would we have been lucky to have had people so determined to run NY racing that they couldn't even make it to the second cut of the bidding process.

Where is the accountability for these people and their followers? Who do they have to answer to for cheering on the Steinbrenner group who abandoned NY racing at the drop of a hat ( or should I say pants )? Of course now they are getting behind Steve Wynn. What will be their response when Wynn drops out in the coming week(s)? How can Excelsior even be considered a viable bidder when they change leadership like Gary Stevens changes occupations?

blackthroatedwind 04-15-2007 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Payson Dave
It seems to me that the delay in getting the slots up and running at Aqu has been an intentional attempt to undermine NYRA....I think it is fair to explore which politians benefit from the undermining of NYRA and how do they benefit...ie some connection to Excelsior or Empire???


No doubt. If NYRA had the slots running two years ago, as they legally should have, they would have been so financially strong that replacing them would have been extremely tough. But, of course, Empire actually claimed last summer at Saratoga that NYRA had intentionally withheld the slots ( to keep money from the horsemen I suppose ). Here's another group, Empire, that is either not smart enough to understand the situation or willing to say ANYTHING to attempt to make NYRA look bad. Either way they hardly seem like a group that should be in a position to run racing in NY.

easy goer 04-15-2007 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grits
The Times Union may have been alright for Upstate, rather limits the reach I think.

The piece would serve better in the Wall Street Journal, the NYTimes, the NYPost, and every other major racing publication and newspaper in the country where racing has a stake.

Do they even cover racing anymore? Washington Post no longer carries the stuff from Laurel Park.

The more I think about it, the more I think slots will be the death of the industry.

They want to promote jockeys ala the NBA? this is the kind of stuff Executive Assistants at PR firms come up with over lunch. "Hey what about the NBA? Yeah I see a connection here."

They ought to take that jockey cam and put it on them in the jock's room when they play poker. "Oh look DOminguez made his flush. THere's no way Jara can get away from this hand." :)

milliam 04-15-2007 12:29 PM

How many years do we get before VLT operators say horse racing is hurting our bottom line ?

SniperSB23 04-15-2007 12:35 PM

There is absolutely no way to promote the jockeys as long as there is no way for the common fan to tell which jockey is which each race without looking at their form. As long as the jockeys are wearing the owners silks they are not promotable. Unless they come up with a way to differentiate the jockeys by a quick glance while keeping the owners happy there is little to no chance of promoting the jockeys. Imagine if Larry Bird or Magic Johnson wore a helmet and goggles and came out in a different color jersey with a different number every game. Even they would have been difficult to promote in that situation.

saucon17 04-15-2007 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
There is absolutely no way to promote the jockeys as long as there is no way for the common fan to tell which jockey is which each race without looking at their form. As long as the jockeys are wearing the owners silks they are not promotable. Unless they come up with a way to differentiate the jockeys by a quick glance while keeping the owners happy there is little to no chance of promoting the jockeys. Imagine if Larry Bird or Magic Johnson wore a helmet and goggles and came out in a different color jersey with a different number every game. Even they would have been difficult to promote in that situation.

The only way they can promote jockeys is to switch to thier own
racing silks like the do with harness drivers who have their own set of
driving silks. At least in harness you know who is driving the horse by
just looking at colors of the driver than looking at a program to find out

SniperSB23 04-15-2007 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saucon17
The only way they can promote jockeys is to switch to thier own
racing silks like the do with harness drivers who have their own set of
driving silks. At least in harness you know who is driving the horse by
just looking at colors of the driver than looking at a program to find out

Which is something the owners would never support.

SniperSB23 04-15-2007 12:45 PM

Also, imagine how much more difficult Magic Johnson and Larry Bird would have been to promote if their owners continually forced them to dress up in pink costumes.

theiman 04-15-2007 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept
I should NOT be doing this, but the importance of Steve Crist's column in today's paper is too important to be restricted to DRF subscribers. Anyone who has formed any opinion on the NY situation based on the lies and misrepresentations of the slot money salivators try to gain the franchise needs to know the facts.. Here they are presented by someone who speaks independently and with authority and first hand comprehension of the situation.


New York bidders twist reality
By STEVEN CRIST


NEW YORK - The four-ring circus in Albany, N.Y., last week that passed for public hearings on the New York racing franchise was above all else an illustration of how fiction becomes accepted as truth when repeated often enough.

The three private-equity groups seeking to replace the not-for-profit New York Racing Association - Capital Play Ltd., Empire Racing Associates and Excelsior Racing - are motivated primarily by the prospect of operating lucrative slot-machine parlors at Aqueduct and perhaps Belmont Park. To get that opportunity to shower themselves and their investors in public money, though, these bidders have to pretend that their real interest is in racing, and that they have quick and easy solutions that will make the sport wildly popular and profitable.

Their arguments boil down to three massive falsehoods:

Big Lie No. 3: Slot machines on the premises will attract and convert the masses into racing fans.

Perhaps between now and its Memorial Day deadline for naming a new franchisee, the panel could try to locate a single racino operator in the country who has found Wynn's scenario to work. They won't find one. Slots provide a welcome subsidy to racing but they do not create racing fans, ando in the long run the sport and its customers become increasingly marginalized and squeezed off the casino floor.

I am only addressing Mr. Crists comments regarding his "Big Lie" #3. Specifically, his comment

the panel could try to locate a single racino operator in the country who has found Wynn's scenario to work. They won't find one

Mr. Crist apparently has not done his due dillegence in this matter. There is one track that has worked on cross promoting slots and racing. The first years results showed substantial gains. In fact they be the "only" track that has tried something to cross promote racing and slots.
Below is the article and link. I have bolded significant numbers

Posted: Friday, December 01, 2006

Remington Park concludes live meet with double-digit increases


Remington Park concluded its 68-day live Thoroughbred meet on November 28 with double-digit mutuel handle increases spurred in part by the track's casino, which opened just over a year ago.

The Oklahoma City track reported an all-sources handle of $68,736,967, a 47.5% increase compared to 2005. The average daily mutuel handle of $1,010,838 increased 43.1%.

Total simulcasting export handle was $53,260,506, a 71% increase compared to last year. Remington's on-track live handle increased 17.7% to $5,337,990.

Wagering at the track's Oklahoma off-track betting parlors also increased 17.7% to $822,283.

"We've had a great season," said Scott Wells, Remington's vice president and general manager. "It's been extremely gratifying to see the public's response to the racino concept and to the improved quality of racing we've been able to offer."

The meet also featured a record $12,153,670 in purses. Daily purses averaged a record $178,730, which topped the previous mark of $106,842 set in 1996.

The track ran 625 races that drew an average of 9.6 starters per race, a slight increase over last season's 9.2 average.

"Thanks to our horsemen, we've been able to set a record in terms of field size, which has paid off not only in live on-track handle but also in simulcast export handle," Wells said. "Bettors across the country have recognized the improvement of our racing product in terms of both quality and quantity of horses."

Live racing at Remington drew 324,088 fans, a 209.4% increase over a year ago.

http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/nat...increases.aspx

Now I also sent an e-mail to the GM, Scott Wells to ask him about his concept and why he has succeeded where others have yet to show results. Here is his response.

Dear Ira,

Thank you for your kind words regarding the recently concluded Remington Park meet. As far as an explanation goes, you were right on target. We do try to incentivize our slots players to play the races by sending them betting vouchers in our direct marketing mailouts. The values of the vouchers are in relation to the Guest's level of slots play. Perhaps the most important aspect to our achievement of crossover is the design of the racino itself. Nearly all racinos are designed like Las Vegas casinos in that there are no distractions from those focused on the electronic games. I insisted that we have an area of the casino (next to the video poker machines) which overlooks the finish line and the winner's circle. The Lookout, as it is called, is a very comfortable simulcast area on which the curtain is kept close when there is no live racing. But when the horses are coming onto the track for the first race (we race almost exclusively at night), the curtain is raised and the simulcast players AND the slots players see the excitement of live horse racing.
Regarding our big increase in simulcast export, the vastly improved quality of our racing product has been largely responsible for that. Bettors across the country now see many more familiar names (Storm Cat, Deputy Minister, Seeking the Gold---Nelson Bunker Hunt, The Vinery, Will Farish, Pin Oak, etc.) than they have in years past. And of course that is all a result of the increase in purses. As you know, 9.6 starters per race is a great number and is attractive to nationwide players accustomed to short fields and short prices.
We have been successful in getting into the California market with our Thoroughbred signal only occasionally. That's something I'm working on but the people who control the importation of signals there are very limited in what they can do and nearly always opt for more races from better-known tracks, despite the short fields.
Again, thanks for your comments. They certainly brightened my day even if they never reach my bosses at MEC.

Best of Racing Luck,

Scott Wells

Vice President & General Manager



Now I am not saying that this concept will work everywhere that slots are put in. Nor am I saying that that Wynns group is right for the job. However, I dont think there has been a racino added to a track that has even tried to cross promote. What a shame that there "might" be something that can work to attract new fans, its right in front of them and managments cant see it.

On a side note, I noticed an article this week that Magna gave out large bonuses to some executives, even retired executives, I didnt see Mr. Wells name on the list. What a shame.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.