![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But I'm willing to freely admit that my thinking may be a product of the fact that I always liked Jazil from the beginning, rather than a rational, evidence-based conclusion... ...since he kind of wasn't actually that good in the big picture. He was a neat horse who was good for what he was good for, and he was fortunate to have run a couple of decent races and to mostly inherit a Belmont Stakes in which it seemed like he was the only 12-furlong runner in the field anyway. I liked his Derby better. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Though I do disagree with your entire premise in this thread, but I don't have anything to add. |
Quote:
|
I for one cannot wait until this discussion is over. So much time and print wasted about a bunch of bad horses. Frankly, who cares. The all sucked. I just hope to God that 2009 will bring something special.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No need to and I certainly am not a Jazil expert, just the opposite. I only said he wasn't a slouch. I just thought he ran well in a very good derby field and had a fairly decent showing as 3 yr old including winning the grueling Belmont. |
Quote:
this makes me embarrassed that i have ever come close to agreeing with you on anything. at any rate, i think hoy is curlins, but certainly i can't fault anyone for voting for brown. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hasili's Cacique and Personal Ensign's Our Emblem were perhaps also more well known for being famous sons rather than what they did on the racetrack. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.