![]() |
goodnight Mera.
thanks for staying up so I have someone to tallk to on here. Ive got to make some time and get on here during the day more often when more ppl are on. Repent |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Interesting, by asking for the most "talented" 3-y-o, you're suggesting that they don't always have had to applied that talent. I prefer to rate horses by ability rather than talent. A minor semantical point, I know, but important nonetheless.
Hawk Wing or Point Given in my opinion. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
i guess out of those i just listed, i'd go with northern dancer. dual classic winner, and a worldwide influence on the breed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
well, if you are just talking accomplishment during the running of their 3YO year, then, no- there probably are not 10 better US dirt horses than Secretariat. when you say "better", I think accomplishment. I have no idea. I cant even say with complete confidence who is "better" btwn 2 horses from the same crop like Bernardini and Discreet Cat, so I have no freaking clue who is better btwn Secretariat and a horse that ran 30 years earlier like Citation or Coaltown. Repent |
Quote:
and i just read further on where repent 'fessed up again. hell, 'pent, i had smarty all along and never made a dime on him! you gotta play to win. no biggie...also had sunday silence, didn't bet him either. of course i was too young to play genuine risk. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
George Washington has just stated a very good case to be on this list.
|
also regarding secretariat....it's always difficult to debate this horse and what he did, and did not do. he accomplished quite a lot, his tc races were breathtaking performances. BUT the best horse ever doesn't lose 5 of 21. almost 1/4 of his races were losses. ignoring those would be like ignoring perfect drifts losses on turf when he was a potential hoy candidate--remember that argument by his trainer??
i think you could make the argument that there were ten horses who were better at three than secretariat. of course you could make an argument on just about anything.... so, if you truly thought about it--what ten would there be? eclipse colin man o war--don't forget, this guy was placed ahead of sec on the top 100 by bloodhorse. seattle slew--unbeated thru the tc, something sec was not. count fleet citation spectacular bid affirmed--after all, he had to keep beating alydar war admiral--perfect 8 for 8, including a win in the belmont with one fourth of his hoof ripped off at the start. his preakness was ONE WEEK after the derby (in which he had the second fastest time in that race)-preakness time was two ticks off the track record, and the track was 'good' not fast. and in the belmont, he broke the belmont track record (set by man o war) and equaled the american record for that distance. now, am i saying i really believe those ten were better??? lol maybe they are, maybe they aren't. my point is you could make that argument. it's all in the eye of the beholder. secretariat gets most of his laurels due to three races. important races obviously....BUT overall at three? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
He confirmed himself Europe's Champion Miler with a truly majestic performance. I will post my full thoughts on the race in the International Forum shortly! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
after the race they interviewed AO and he said the the BC mile is the most likely next stop for him. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.