Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Rachel to Monmouth on July 24... (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36931)

parsixfarms 07-01-2010 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo (Post 664172)
Isn't that 70% more that 250k race would pay? Don't you think MP went to Jess and requested Rachel run at MP and don't you think that they told him we will do what we need to to make you and your horse special. We will change the date distance and purse and maybe we will buy the hats off NYRA? lol

That's the point.. she is a free agent owned by a man who can do as he wishes even if it doest make sense to the stakes nazi "Rollo"..

Your stance that NYRA should request Rachel off grounds is funny..Instead of throwing out the red carpet you suggest they pitch the biggest star(draw) on the east coast.. "It's Blame day here at SPA. come and see this strapping son of Arch" lol

Hey maybe Jess just wanted to give MP his prize to show he supported for forward thinking vs. maiden claiming NY bred turf racing at 5.5f's..

I know I know once the VLT's are in the world will be free from disease..

You're right, Jess Jackson can run is horse anywhere he wants, but what don't you get about the fact that NYRA's rolled out the red carpet for Jackson for three years running? As you note, he doesn't need the money, so why should they be expected to bump the purse for her? As for telling Asmussen to leave her at Monmouth, if Rachel's not going to compete at the meet, what good comes from having her stabled at the Oklahoma?

Anyone who's listened to Jackson over the past three years would immediately know that he has a pretty shaky understanding of the sport or its history and its traditions, so I doubt this has anything to do with supporting Monmouth's "million a day" meet.

Cannon Shell 07-01-2010 11:00 PM

[quote=freddymo;664180]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 664175)

when 9 cents is significant in your humble life 90k will be significant to Jess.. 90k get the f out of here Chuck the guy is playing up the 18th hole.. What does he have an estate issue? What's 90k to him a trip to Giolden Corral for you a Tuesday?

You see you just arent rich enough to understand really rich people.
1. Money is how they keep score, period.
2. I'm sure there is some plan mapped out in jacksons head that gets her over some moneywon record and she needs to start earning more than what he is winning in these secondary races.
3. The thought that someone like Jackson is concerned with his hired help getting a few thousand dollars is laughable especially when that hired help has made ALOT of money off of his horses already.

freddymo 07-01-2010 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 664187)
I find it hard to believe that what Monmouth is doing isnt a huge negative in the short and long term. Trading your integrity (which is what they absolutely have done by pandering) just makes it easier for the next flavor of the month to demand the same or more favorable terms. This game is soft enough at the top levels already and moving stakes and changing the distance to fit the schedule of a horse is another step in the wrong direction. I have no problem with them raising the purse of a race to attract horses, that is good business. But the pandering is a joke. It is like Le Bron telling the NBA he will sign with the Knicks if they agree to give them all home games and waive the salary cap for him so he can make more money.

Doing things like this makes it certain that owners will continue to duck and dive and look for handouts as opposed to actually running in races that are considered important. Hooray Racing!

Welcome to 90's were have you been? tear.. You ever try to sell to walmart or Target? You ever try to establish yourself in a market?

Horse racing and integrity your kidding right.. How many fn cheats are exposed a year? The friggin trainer of the super draw(Rachel) has been busted 394 times for drugs. Horses getting taken down by stewards without explaination. Jockeys attack each other during races. Trainers send horses to slaughter and owners that own 150k a session stallions starve there stock and go to Jail. Please you are worried about making a time and date for people to be entertained and smile.. Good lookin out

Cannon Shell 07-01-2010 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo (Post 664194)
Welcome to 90's were have you been? tear.. You ever try to sell to walmart or Target? You ever try to establish yourself in a market?

Horse racing and integrity your kidding right.. How many fn cheats are exposed a year? The friggin trainer of the super draw(Rachel) has been busted 394 times for drugs. Horses getting taken down by stewards without explaination. Jockeys attack each other during races. Trainers send horses to slaughter and owners that own 150k a session stallions starve there stock and go to Jail. Please you are worried about making a time and date for people to be entertained and smile.. Good lookin out

Those are seperate issues.

The reason that the Triple Crown works is because people desire to win those races. It seems as though that series and the BC to a lesser degree are the only important races left. Virtually every trainer of horses in the TC series would love to see the races spaced a little differently and almost none of them have horses suited to go as far as the races are written. Yet they continue to show up for them. When was the last time a TC race had a 5 horse field? It works because people have no choice but to run under the conditions given. That doesnt mean that every classic race is a classic but you can feel pretty secure knowing that winning one means something.

But this idea that horses dont have to run against top competition to be horse of the year, that the historically signifigant races are passed over for made for one horse events, that handicaps are made a mockery of because of the desire to prop up a popular horses record, that an owner can dictate the date and distance of a race that others are paying to run in as well, is well disturbing. It is one thing if baseball players are taking steroids. it is another if the league is handing them out.

The sport is crumbling and RA running in the Delaware Hdcp or Ruffian isnt going to change that. But the pandering to RA continues down the path that makes important races less important, makes competition between top horses rarer and lines the pockets of those who need it the least. Sounds like a winner.

freddymo 07-01-2010 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parsixfarms (Post 664190)
You're right, Jess Jackson can run is horse anywhere he wants, but what don't you get about the fact that NYRA's rolled out the red carpet for Jackson for three years running? As you note, he doesn't need the money, so why should they be expected to bump the purse for her? As for telling Asmussen to leave her at Monmouth, if Rachel's not going to compete at the meet, what good comes from having her stabled at the Oklahoma?
Anyone who's listened to Jackson over the past three years would immediately know that he has a pretty shaky understanding of the sport or its history and its traditions, so I doubt this has anything to do with supporting Monmouth's "million a day" meet.

Maybe they play there cards right they could get 1 race from Rachel.. They need her she dont need them. At this point it is all about the ridiculous BC Classic which is really the issue that needs to be addressed.
Horses are prepped not campaigned.. But its here to stay so make the best of it and ultilze stardom when you have it.. How many stars have truly transcended racing...Blame?

parsixfarms 07-01-2010 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo (Post 664200)
Maybe they play there cards right they could get 1 race from Rachel.. They need her she dont need them. At this point it is all about the ridiculous BC Classic which is really the issue that needs to be addressed.

I think you grossly overstate her "drawing" power. At best, she probably brought about 8,000 extra people to the track when she won the Mother Goose and the Woodward in 2009.

freddymo 07-01-2010 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 664199)
Those are seperate issues.

The reason that the Triple Crown works is because people desire to win those races. It seems as though that series and the BC to a lesser degree are the only important races left. Virtually every trainer of horses in the TC series would love to see the races spaced a little differently and almost none of them have horses suited to go as far as the races are written. Yet they continue to show up for them. When was the last time a TC race had a 5 horse field? It works because people have no choice but to run under the conditions given. That doesnt mean that every classic race is a classic but you can feel pretty secure knowing that winning one means something.

But this idea that horses dont have to run against top competition to be horse of the year, that the historically signifigant races are passed over for made for one horse events, that handicaps are made a mockery of because of the desire to prop up a popular horses record, that an owner can dictate the date and distance of a race that others are paying to run in as well, is well disturbing. It is one thing if baseball players are taking steroids. it is another if the league is handing them out.

The sport is crumbling and RA running in the Delaware Hdcp or Ruffian isnt going to change that. But the pandering to RA continues down the path that makes important races less important, makes competition between top horses rarer and lines the pockets of those who need it the least. Sounds like a winner.

HoY this is about marketing..its about people coming to the track something which currently only happens at Delmar and SPA. People dont go to the track, horses arent stars and people have gambling options including other options at the track which keep them away from racing..

Yep that Historic Mother Goose last year was a real humdinger.

freddymo 07-01-2010 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parsixfarms (Post 664204)
I think you grossly overstate her "drawing" power. At best, she probably brought about 8,000 extra people to the track when she won the Mother Goose and the Woodward in 2009.

Ok no biggie for NYRA.. 8k more for the Mother Goose is 160% more then typical no biggie huh? Your right lets get Hedge Fund fired up again

Patrick333 07-02-2010 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215 (Post 663949)
Rachel has run in two ungraded stakes during the last sixteen months, which did include five consecutive Grade Is in 2009. You kind of make it sound like she's repeatedly running in ungraded races.

Neither of these two deserve any notoriety in terms of seeking out strong competition in 2010.

NT

The point I was trying to make (and not very well I guess) is that the anti Zenyatta crowd would be having a field day with her connections if she was running in an ungraded race.

I have as much respect for both of these great horses as anybody. I love watching them both run.

NTamm1215 07-02-2010 07:30 AM

I did like this quote from the DRF story, "Mike Dempsey, the racing secretary at Monmouth Park, said, "There are no appearance fees for anyone involved..."

Well, thank God they didn't have to give the old coot money just for showing up. Nearly tripling the purse, moving the date, and lengthening it was just enough I guess.

http://www.drf.com/news/article/114353.html

NT

Sightseek 07-02-2010 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski (Post 664125)
He's an uber douche, no argument there, but in the case of Curlin-Big Brown that wasn't really ever feasible. Big Brown only ran once in a race that Curlin was even eligible for (the Monmouth Stakes on turf), and I think it's understandable that Curlin went in the JCGC instead given his already proven average ability on turf.

As for the Rachel-Zenyatta matchup, we all know it should have happened at Oaklawn. That it didn't was frustrating on a lot of levels.

This year's campaign was protective to this point... which I get (somewhat)... but the Lady's Secret choice is a joke. She obviously is back to where she should be.

At that time he was saying Curlin was running in the Grade 1 races with a lot of history behind them and that Big Brown should have to meet him at a race of that magnitude.

Guess things have changed in his mind.

Sightseek 07-02-2010 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 664187)
I find it hard to believe that what Monmouth is doing isnt a huge negative in the short and long term. Trading your integrity (which is what they absolutely have done by pandering) just makes it easier for the next flavor of the month to demand the same or more favorable terms. This game is soft enough at the top levels already and moving stakes and changing the distance to fit the schedule of a horse is another step in the wrong direction. I have no problem with them raising the purse of a race to attract horses, that is good business. But the pandering is a joke. It is like Le Bron telling the NBA he will sign with the Knicks if they agree to give them all home games and waive the salary cap for him so he can make more money.

Doing things like this makes it certain that owners will continue to duck and dive and look for handouts as opposed to actually running in races that are considered important. Hooray Racing!

:tro:

The Indomitable DrugS 07-02-2010 09:18 AM

Freddy is just cracking me up in this thread.

Even when he's hopelessly wrong about things ... he's still an all-time great poster.

NTamm1215 07-02-2010 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 664279)
Freddy is just cracking me up in this thread.

Even when he's hopelessly wrong about things ... he's still an all-time great poster.

He just hi-jacked my call with Steve too. He's like a runaway freight train. That is unless there's another Freddy from NJ with the same views? I'll bet no.

NT

Antitrust32 07-02-2010 09:48 AM

What I dont understand is why everyone feels that just cause Rachel is running July 24th at MTH, why does that mean she wont be running at Saratoga??

She'll have plenty of opportunities to run at saratoga towards the latter stages of that meet.

Didnt she run in the Haskell AND the Woodward last year?

Maybe she wins this race and goes for back to back Woodwards?

Why is everyone convinced you wont see her at Toga??

RolloTomasi 07-02-2010 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 664292)
Why is everyone convinced you wont see her at Toga??

I doubt they'll want to run her 10f and I doubt they'll want to run her against males off a race that is likely to have as weak a field as this year's Fleur De Lis or Apple Blossom.

Monmouth might try hard to get her back, too, with the Molly Pitcher run I believe the same day as the Personal Ensign.

freddymo 07-02-2010 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi (Post 664318)
I doubt they'll want to run her 10f and I doubt they'll want to run her against males off a race that is likely to have as weak a field as this year's Fleur De Lis or Apple Blossom.

Monmouth might try hard to get her back, too, with the Molly Pitcher run I believe the same day as the Personal Ensign.

I hear its a two race deal. Sometime in the next month they will ship Rachel to the shore and have her paraded to Molly Pitcher's well at the site of the Battle of Monmouth. Should be great stuff!

Antitrust32 07-02-2010 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi (Post 664318)
I doubt they'll want to run her 10f and I doubt they'll want to run her against males off a race that is likely to have as weak a field as this year's Fleur De Lis or Apple Blossom.

Monmouth might try hard to get her back, too, with the Molly Pitcher run I believe the same day as the Personal Ensign.

I've heard that the goal is the Lady's Secret, Woodward and Breeders Cup.

Woodward was 9f last year.. did they change it?

RolloTomasi 07-02-2010 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 664350)
I've heard that the goal is the Lady's Secret, Woodward and Breeders Cup.

Woodward was 9f last year.. did they change it?

Not that I know of.

If she ran in the Woodward after this that would be more in line with Jess Jackson's prior style of campaigning, so hopefully you end up being correct.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.