Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   My Prediction for Santa Anita (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=19265)

pgardn 01-15-2008 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
not necessarily.
they caution you about feeding hay from the ground, especially if you have particularly sandy soil, as a horse can injest a fair amount of sand over time and develop sand colic.
i also read about a horse who was a cribber-they had used belts as fencing material, and the horse damn near died. they removed an almost soccer-ball sized ball of rubber from his gut-it didn't pass thru, but kept getting larger the more he nibbled.

Watch when a horse eats.
They grab with the big rubbery lips
and they pull. Sometimes just grass tears off.
But some of the time some of the grass with roots
also comes up. All kinds of crud hang on the roots.

Horses take in all sorts of crud.
And they colic more often when supplemented
with the very high calorie stuff, too much grain and
sweet crap.

pgardn 01-15-2008 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I'm pretty sure I know the answer to this, but do you bet on a regular basis?

Last bet. BC Turf.
No actually last bet I lost to C. Simon.

But spring nears. And my ears prick.
Why? Do I need to be more addicted
because I wait for warm weather and more
tracks I am familiar with and a betting public that
bets more for fun.

Bad move? Holding off in the winter?

pgardn 01-15-2008 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I don't care if you don't bet ever again. I just found it humorous that someone who admittingly bets not so often was commenting on how gamblers need to adjust their thinking.

I really take you about as seriously as you take me.

I will take note that not betting in the winter, is not betting often.
I must be a year around gambler to understand wagering.
Arlington Jim basically said the same thing about betting
surfaces.
Guess he does
not wager in the Winter either.

Thanks for your stellar insight as always.
Even though neither of us care.
Yours
Peegarden.

Danzig 01-15-2008 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mumtaz
Horses cannot breath through their mouths, so I doubt much is getting in through the mouth and then swallowed during or just after a race, as the epiglottis is closed down over the esophagus so the horse can breath. So ingestion isn't anything I'd worry about, be it synthetic, turf or dirt.

Nostrils are a concern, obviously. Vets routinely find alot of dirt in the trachea and larger bronchi after races, but particles of any composition (dirt, smog, AWT, dust, whatever) have to be very, very tiny (there is a particular micron size) to get further down the airways than the "supply tubes".

From the little available that I have read vets are seeing less mucus post-race days on the synthetics vs dirt (mucus is the body bringing irritants up and out of the larger airways), and less stuff in the larger airways. Maybe Chuck can comment on what his track vets have seen.

Obviously any dry, powdery surface (think dust) is a greater threat for stuff getting deeper into the lungs than a damper, heavier, larger particle (which gets caught upon inhalation in the sinuses and upper airways as it should be).

Sand isn't going to go very far generally, it's a big particle as far as the airways are concerned.

I, too, would be more worried about the dried manure, organic matter, fungal spores, etc in dirt than in a synthetic, if inhaled deeply.

I removed an intact set of pantyhose from a Labrador's stomach and intestine once :rolleyes:

yeah, no doubt the lungs would be a larger concern when actually racing-my part about ingestion was in regard to pg talking about swallowing dirt.
hopefully they won't find any health issues down the road due to the track--of course all that smog in cali hasn't hurt them, so maybe they're pretty resilient!!

The Bid 01-15-2008 06:42 PM

Oh they will find something in time. These morons didnt have the sense to test any of this **** prior to installation. We just decided to wing it, good idea. Idiots

pgardn 01-15-2008 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
yeah, no doubt the lungs would be a larger concern when actually racing-my part about ingestion was in regard to pg talking about swallowing dirt.
hopefully they won't find any health issues down the road due to the track--of course all that smog in cali hasn't hurt them, so maybe they're pretty resilient!!

Since you mentioned cribbing Z.
I figured out a really neat thing
that works down here in the barn
my wife has her horse.

If you do own a horse, or ever own one
I got something that really works well
that would probably work all year in warmer
weather areas. On Rubber, wood, whatever.

2Hot4TV 01-15-2008 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
yeah, no doubt the lungs would be a larger concern when actually racing-my part about ingestion was in regard to pg talking about swallowing dirt.
hopefully they won't find any health issues down the road due to the track--of course all that smog in cali hasn't hurt them, so maybe they're pretty resilient!!

Air Quality Index

Dallas Texas 30AQI

New York, N.Y. 45AQI

L.A. California 31AQI

Little Rock, Arkansas 'Well I can tell you it's real clear today so I guess the # would be 15, yes today is the 15th.

The air in L.A. is better than you think.

pgardn 01-15-2008 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I have no desire to waste any more time with you. Let's be honest, you probably rarely bet. It's fine, but when it comes to gambling maybe it's best to stay out of the discussion. Like I said, it's comical that you had the audacity to tell people that pump a lot of money into pools that maybe they'll have to "show a little ingenuity." I will say that your expertise on basically every subject in the world is amazing. What's it like to know everything?

Please convince my wife.
I got a friggin track in my hometown
It is really a great simulcasting facility
and I get race replays all the time.
Any time you want to come and watch
races with me... (I realize only on your deathbed
would you ever stoop so low)

So we will be honest. I think I bet too much.

And as far as interest in a lot of things, I am.
I mean if you really dont believe I dont know
what I am talking about all you got to do is
ask questions and reveal how much I dont know.

So I happen to mention cribbing. My wife was getting
pissed at her horse chewing and breathing in excess
air on the stall on the time. So just ask... I wont chime
in if its not something I know nothing about.

I have never chimed in on the Buffy movies. Never on
the Sopranos. Never on hockey. Ask a lot of questions
about golf from kev because I find it impossible to play.
Horses. I read a heck of a lot from this site and others
and I got a damn track and know some jocks who are
no longer present and a trainer that has moved on. I know
vets and my wife owns a damn horse. So yes I am in to a lot
of stuff that happen to include horses. (Which I have a terrible
memory for with names)

But I often throw out statements in order to get reactions (often too provocative and I apologize)
to gauge if I can learn something. So since this thread was
about the track at Santa Anita. I ask you: What is in the
kickback that is so harsh at Santa Anita. I think I know what it
is. What do you think?

pgardn 01-15-2008 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I think you are taking a trip down to crazy town again.

I think I have no idea what is causing the kickback issues at Santa Anita. I think I really don't care other than I used to like betting Santa Anita and now I am reduced to betting only turf races. I think what is going on at Santa Anita right now is a disgrace. I think if people were a bit more honest (I do not mean you) about their agendas that these discussions would go a lot smoother. That's what I think.

I think its probably a little bit of the limestone that lies over the base. That means its in really bad shape if its little rocks like Rupert said. And I think The Bid is probably right that they moved too soon without proper testing.

And it is sad because I like watching the race replays from that track. And I liked betting the track with the full fields last summer/Fall. It was fun laying a bet a and coming back home and watching on the computer. Did not fair so well there though. Practice.

Riot 01-16-2008 01:05 AM

Quote:

i say:
if anyone here bothered to read this long-ass article they would see horses are coming back from scopes with rubber in their lungs and/or throats...who is this poster who says he's a vet?...that was just a ridiculous thing to say...i know, from my own experience, that even just food particles can get caught in a human's lungs (and cause major problems) so to say kickback can't get in a horses lungs cause they breathe thru their noses while running is beyond stupidity and his license should be pulled asap...can u say entrapped
Then it's a good thing that's not what I said.

Perhaps, before you make any more painfully ironic comments about "beyond stupidity", you should re-read that post, very s-l-o-w-l-y.

Danzig 01-16-2008 07:09 AM

i got quite a kick out of that post last nite, mr vet (!!!), and thought you would as well....

you mail your license in yet???:D

Honu 01-16-2008 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pgardn
I think its probably a little bit of the limestone that lies over the base. That means its in really bad shape if its little rocks like Rupert said. And I think The Bid is probably right that they moved too soon without proper testing.

And it is sad because I like watching the race replays from that track. And I liked betting the track with the full fields last summer/Fall. It was fun laying a bet a and coming back home and watching on the computer. Did not fair so well there though. Practice.

There is no longer a limestone base , it was taken out when the drainage system was installed , some of the rocks came with the sand , which is coarser than what had first been installed.
The little rocks that are coming up I do believe are coming from the macadam base that was scruffed up when they took the track up and pressure washed it.
I was out there yesterday with about 40 other people picking thru the track for rocks , I only found about 10 , 2 were good sized and sharp and the rest were from the macadam so they were fairly small, nonetheless still would hurt like a bugger to get hit with them.
The sand is most likely what is causing the sting , its pretty coarse and I imagine it feels about like winterized tracks do back east.

Riot 01-16-2008 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by merasmag
i was referring to what u said as a whole, but it did start this way:

"Horses cannot breath through their mouths, so I doubt much is getting in through the mouth and then swallowed during or just after a race, as the epiglottis is closed down over the esophagus so the horse can breath."

when i get home from work, i'll look for more on the subject too

Yes, that was in reference to horses swallowing the material, getting it into their stomach and intestines (see Zig's post on sand colic concerns).

What worries me is what Honu said about this morning (confirming what Bid said here days before - yes Bid, you were RIGHT <g>) - and what is described in a Blood-Horse article dated today: if they are finding pieces of asphalt, that means it's coming from the macadam top of the base - and if the base is breaking up (not level) - that's a big concern if horses can get down through the cushion.

Now, the deep synthetic cushion isn't supposed to allow that to ever happen (like dirt when it gets muddy - it's suspected by some that George Washington may have gone down through the cushion and hit the base at Monmouth, causing his injury).

We'll see.

I wonder if Cushion Track, Inc. has written a check to SA yet, to cover all this, the lost racing days, the Pro-Ride consult, the UC engineering lab consult, etc? No matter how well the other Cushion installation is working in CA (and it appears to have no problems), I don't see how the company is going to overcome the PR from this disaster of an installation, and more importantly, their failure to be able to fix it.

Danzig 01-17-2008 08:36 AM

just read an update on bloodhorse.

santa anita will close for a few days to install the binding agent, but they aren't sure yet when. they don't know yet how long it will take to produce enough of the binding material for the track. but once that's settled, they will close for about ten days to install.
i hope it works, and that weather is favorable until then.

pgardn 01-17-2008 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honu
There is no longer a limestone base , it was taken out when the drainage system was installed , some of the rocks came with the sand , which is coarser than what had first been installed.
The little rocks that are coming up I do believe are coming from the macadam base that was scruffed up when they took the track up and pressure washed it.
I was out there yesterday with about 40 other people picking thru the track for rocks , I only found about 10 , 2 were good sized and sharp and the rest were from the macadam so they were fairly small, nonetheless still would hurt like a bugger to get hit with them.
The sand is most likely what is causing the sting , its pretty coarse and I imagine it feels about like winterized tracks do back east.

Thats not good.

Horse getting a sharp rock in
the face, jockeys getting pelted.

The rocks came with the sand?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.