Belichick will keep cheating. He will just try to position the cameras better is all. I think it is a no penalty...really. The money is nothing and when you draft 6 or 7 players losing one is no big deal..as they have multiple picks next year. I think taking every single pick from them would have been a better penalty.

I would have rather seen them suspend Belichek for 2-3 games than hand down a fine that Kraft will ultimately pick up. The draft pick is a step in the right direction, but since they own the niners pick which will be better anyway. It seems that they got off easy.

"people are nut cases because they disagree with you on the penalty?"

people are nut cases because they want a 38-14 loss to be a win.

"Obviously you are a Pats fan."

i live in l.a. i hate everyone with a football team.

How can you say it did not affect the outcome of the game?

because nfl security had been warned and took the camera in the 1st quarter.

A Jets player was quoted as saying, before this came out, that it was like the Pats knew what the Jets were going to do on every play.

i guess that's how it feels when you lose 38-14.

that people suggesting the patriots should forfeit the game need a life.

i think you asked me what the punishment should be earlier in the string and i said loss of a pick the first day of the draft. i thought the commisioner would have the best interest of the league in mind and whatever he decided i'd be okay with.

he decided on a 1st round pick and fines. i'm okay with that.

trust me, I have a life and I am sure it is a lot better than yours. You are just a troll that has to get personal with people to try to justify your point since you can't do it well with an argument. You are obviously not smart enough to realize that people are supporting a forfeit for the very simple point that cheating, particularly when you have been warned specifically not to do something, has to have severe consequences. If the Pats were going to crush the Jets, which is probably true, than why did Belichick have to bother doing this?

Belichick has to be taught that you cannot stick your finger right in the commissioner's face by doing something you have been warned not to do. IMO the thing that hurts the most and stops cheaters is a forfeit. People can disagree, but to tell people to get a life because they take an arguable position is just being an a$$. Then again, what should I expect from someone who calls themeself god.

email the commish.

he may find logic in your fan rant and change his mind.

the next time the pats play in the meadowlands , the team bus should leave Bill at the NJ turnpike and make him go through the parking lot to get to the stadium.... nothin else

Not even in the same ballpark.

The one question I have that no one seems to be asking is that if Mangini was aware that his signals were being stolen, why didn't he simply change them from game to game? Wouldn't the other team having faulty information actually be an advantage for the Jets?

Mangini obviously would think of this which leads me to believe that he just wanted for Belichik to get caught, not that he thought that the Pats would actually gain a signifigant advantage from them

[quote=Cannon Shell]Not even in the same ballpark.

The one question I have that no one seems to be asking is that if Mangini was aware that his signals were being stolen, why didn't he simply change them from game to game? Wouldn't the other team having faulty information actually be an advantage for the Jets?

Mangini obviously would think of this which leads me to believe that he just wanted for Belichik to get caught, not that he thought that the Pats would actually gain a signifigant advantage from them[/QUOTE]

Chuck, I'm sorry to say this is an extremely valid point, and while it does not absolve Belichek of cheating, makes me feel a whole lot worse about the woeful performance of the Jets defense last week.

[quote=golfer]At least you pawned off Herm and got something in return which seems to be one of the great front office deals in a long time.

Herman Edwards is a wonderful human being, a quality motivational speaker, and a below average football coach. By the way, You Play to Win the Game, but sometimes you coach not to lose.

First off, idiot, I am NOT a Jets fan. I don't even like the city of New York. But what's wrong is wrong and if you can't see that a forfeit is the only logical answer, then you are a dope.

maybe you're right and i'm wrong.

lets wait and see what the commisioner decides.

THis is a very good summary.
This is why Belichick is really not putting up any sort of arguement.
The Pats are not making a huge deal of it either.

I think a forfeit would have sent the best message.
However, the Jets dont really deserve a win.
So give them a lose also, because they did.

The punishment that was doled out will hurt though.
Especially so if McFadden of Arkansas turns out to
be the player that could have been.

maybe mangini thought he could win regardless. maybe he got embarrassed to find that wasn't the case. after all, he and the pats met three times last year, would be somewhat safe to say that it may happen again this year.
zabe on fox sports had a compelling argument as to why it was a big deal, as well as why mangini owes his loyalty to his new employers, and not his old coach.

my big question tho, is what does this do to tom brady? something not really getting much mention, how good is a QB who knows, doesn't just think, but KNOWS what the defense is going to do? is he tainted now? i would think the scandal would have to have an affect on him, his reputation, his legacy.
i always thought he was a good one. now i'm not so sure. how much was he helped? perhaps bonds can loan him one of those asterisks...

Jeez.
They dont lose the highest placed 1st rounder, via the 49ers most likely.
OK that sux. They might still be in line for McFadden. If the 49ers end up with the worst record, and the Pats get McFadden, thats not good.

Yeah.

The people who think any of this impacted this game are totally insane.

This game featured a 108 yard kickoff return for a TD by NE - a 51 yard bomb NE TD to a reciever who was being TRIPLE covered on the play.

The signal stealing might have helped them in a game later on in the season, not this one.

New England always looks like a vastly improved team when they play teams for a second or third time in the same season - the Colts and Steelers know that as well as anyone.

However, I don't think stealing signals are the real reason for that.

maybe they'd have won this game regardless...but how many games have they won due to cheating? how tainted is their record now? how much better would it make a good team such as the pats--and if they were that good, why did he feel the need to go over the top on this, and risk so much for this game?