I disagree mort. Back then they had duckett and also the tight end crumpler.

With that much speed (vick and moss) and that much size, its not like you could cheat on anybody. A defense would have to line up at least nickel almost every down to deal with the outside speed. Want to roll coverage to moss? Okay, but that means one less guy to come after Vick. Want to cheat on Vick and leave Moss single covered deep? And beyond that, are you really going to cover Crumpler over the middle with a backer? And if you go dime, duckett would run right down your throat.

WRONG as per usual.

Vick was one of THE worst qb's in the NFL during his time.Maybe the worst.

Moss would have made no difference...in fact Vick may well have been worse.

Look at his ratings.......if you didn't look at him and know already.

Mobile quarterbacks suck.

randy moss recently had the idea to sell his urine as a canned beverage.....we know this beverage as red bull.

If Moss gets a free release - Tom Brady is the best QB he's ever had.

Both of them read defenses the same way - and many times when Moss broke off the route he was supposed to run - Brady would get him the ball quickly and with accuracy and almost never would miss him.

If Moss gets jammed well at the line and has a safety rolling to him - Brady is not a good qb for him.

The latter scenerio happened in the playoffs last year - and the former scenerio happened a lot in the first 9 or 10 games when the Pats were scoring 40 a game and torching everyone.

If you jam Moss well at the line - and have a safety over the top - Jeff Geroge is the only qb he's had who would stick with him, and still make big plays time and again.

......sure, but randy moss is more certain than death or taxes.

Except for mobile eagles qb's!! :{>: Randall

steve young, elway and tarkington were not too shabby;)

What is wrong?

Just because Ohio State got plunger raped by USC doesn't mean you have to pretend to know as much as I do about football.

And the extent that I follow pro football is to watch as many Ravens and Moss games as a I can.

The extent that I follow college football is to read scout reports on new recruits and watch maybe 4 games a year.

I'm going to say it this way:


Moss needed the Pats a LOT more than they needed him.

After all ...they had won 2 very recent NFL titles without him...they've yet to win one with him.

Also...you just made the ALL NIMROD team by purporting to sniff that you know more about football than I do without having any idea about how much I do know about football.


It's also known as Costanza Complex.



I KNOW why Ohio State got bull dozed; I knew it would happen before it happened.


Here's something else for you....USC is not a great team....real good ,but not great.


Don't put too much on them for the big dance this year.

Randy Moss is all there is to football. It's borderline unwatchable without him.

If you know him - you know football. You don't know him.

It's Sun Tzu-esque.

OK ...knowledge contest over.

That was a real dumb statement.


A receiver is about the last thing you look for when putting a team together.The Raiders don't know that ,either.

Moss missed the championship run of the Pats & now he'll likely never get one...kinda like when Mussina went to the Yankees.

15-0 with 15 blowout wins the first of his two years for the Herd.

15-1 and a NFL record for points scored his 1st year with the Vikes

16-0 and a NFL record for points scored his 1st year with the Pats.

And you want to make it about the Raiders? He shined individually in each of his first 4 games with the Raiders and quit on them because their O-line couldn't hold blocks for more than 0.2 seconds. That and he wasn't healthy

Might as well as get your team a high draft pick if they thoroughly suck that bad.

He will win one this year with Matt Cassel.

I wouldn't count on it.

Why?

I got 15/1 on them in an exchange market last week - they should cash it now for me.

Wow.

My thoughts exactly.