Originally Posted by Scav

You better of voted in Virginia....Richmond getting major pub on CNN right now about the lines.

And don't try and change the subject, I am going to make a point once Timmy catergorizes weed as the same as blow, pharms, acid, herion, and alcohol...

Originally Posted by GPK

A drug, is a drug, is a drug.

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

So drinking a cup of coffee is the same as smoking crack?

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

I'm sorry, you must not have read the first three words of this thread. But thanks for the typical rambling imbalanced freak response that I foolishly thought I might not get. Some of your lamest work.

As for the people who actually attempted to answer my question (basically Lori and Morty), I appreciate the input.

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

You really are too much. Since I know you didn't open the link and since apparently besides being an expert on "dope" you are on alcohol and how it impairs someone, I took a little excerpt from the site.


The Legal Limit
In all 50 states, the legal limit for drunk driving is a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) level of .08. A 120-pound woman can reach a .08 BAC level after only two drinks and a 180-pound man can be at .08 after only four drinks.
A "drink" is either one shot of liquor, a five-ounce glass of wine or one beer, all of which contain the same amount of alcohol.

At a .08 BAC level, drivers are so impaired that they are 11 times more likely to have a single-vehicle crash than drivers with no alcohol in their system. But 25 years of research has shown that some impairment begins for both males and females even after one drink.


.02 BAC Level
At the .02 blood alcohol concentration level, experiments have demostrated that people exhibit some loss of judgment, begin to relax and feel good. But tests have also shown that drivers at the .02 level experience a decline in visual functions, affecting their ability to track a moving object, and experience a decline in the ability to perform two tasks at the same time.
These changes may be very subtle and barely noticable to the person who has had only one drink, but in an emergency situation while behind the wheel of a vehicle, they could cause the driver to react (or not react) as they would without having had a drink.


Dimmy, quit while you're behind. This wasn't one of your better showings today.

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

You are a complete waste of time to me! Whatever your state allows .08 or .06 is the criiteria for putting others at risk. So....continue to babble on....

Originally Posted by GPK

Since when is caffine a drug?

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Read the first sentence I bolded.

Originally Posted by Mortimer

What I can do is vouch for these studies..at least for me. I need only sniff booze and I'm seeing HUGE tits on Thebby.

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

since when is it not a drug????

http://kidshealth.org/teen/drug_alco.../caffeine.html


(I'm hoping you are joking)

Originally Posted by GPK

I hope you're the one joking. God knows the hospitals and mourges are filled with people killed from someone driving under the unfluence of a Venti Vanilla Latte. The prisons have to be flowing over with people that kill, steal, etc...just so they can get that fix of Pepsi.

Use some common sense babe...

Originally Posted by GPK

I hope you're the one joking. God knows the hospitals and mourges are filled with people killed from someone driving under the unfluence of a Venti Vanilla Latte. The prisons have to be flowing over with people that kill, steal, etc...just so they can get that fix of Pepsi.

Use some common sense babe...

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Honestly Dimmy, you probably are fine to drive after one drink. But it's mighty hypocritical of you to worry about others driving around "stoned" when you have a beer or whatever and then drive home. That's my point. I don't expect you to get it, but it goes back to the accountability stuff.

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

either you don't understand the word or you're using it incorrectly! If I care that someone doesn't get injured or killed, hypocrisy has nothing to do with it!

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

You are the one that grouped pot with the hard drugs babe. a drug is a drug is a drug.

To steal a sentence from you, I'm sure the prisons have to be flowing over with people that kill, steal, etc... just so they can get that fix of pot.

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

there ya go Scav.... now you can make your point!

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I asked you the other day and I have to ask again. Do you ever take a step back and actually look what you post sometimes? Let's backtrack.

YOU were concerned that I would be harming others by smoking weed. YOU said I would be harming my children or other drivers if I went to the store. Then YOU proceded to tell us that you go out, have a beer and then drive home.

I presented you with information that says even one drink can cause some impairment in people, thus you are a hypocrite. You preach about someone "on dope" driving to the store and possibly putting others at risk, but anytime you get behind the wheel after a drink YOU are doing the same thing.

here's the definition of a hypocrite


1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings

I rest my case.

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

I guess we very much differ on this opinion GPK. I think for drugs I'd list them like this (from least harmful to most harmful):

Caffiene

Tobacco, Pot

Alchohol

shrooms

coke, x, lsd, pharm

Crack, meth, herion

Could prolly group those last two lines together.

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

Timmi, what are your thoughts on Pornography and Gambling?

Especially gambling.. cause that is known to cause harm to others.

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

I guess we very much differ on this opinion GPK. I think for drugs I'd list them like this (from least harmful to most harmful):

Caffiene

Tobacco, Pot

Alchohol

shrooms

coke, x, lsd, pharm

Crack, meth, herion

Could prolly group those last two lines together.

Originally Posted by Mike

Come on, Anti-trust. Shrooms are definitely the least harmful!

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Accountability Dimmy, accountability.

How much does it bother you that I make an ass out of you everytime we go back and forth? You'd think an intellectual like yourself would be able to outsmart a stoner like myself.

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

Just guessing but considering coke is a stimulant with no hallucinogenic properties it is actually probably safer to drive on than alcohol or pot. I'm guessing the majority of people on coke though are also drinking so in that respect it certainly becomes more dangerous than just alcohol or pot would be but that goes for mixing any drugs.

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

Yeah, Len Bias thought so too!

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

Just guessing but considering coke is a stimulant with no hallucinogenic properties it is actually probably safer to drive on than alcohol or pot. I'm guessing the majority of people on coke though are also drinking so in that respect it certainly becomes more dangerous than just alcohol or pot would be but that goes for mixing any drugs.

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

Are you Leslie Stahl or Katie Couric? just wondering